Frontiers: The Demand for Counterfeits: A Descriptive Analysis

References

• Abeler J, Nosenzo D, Raymond C (2019) Preferences for truth-telling. Econometrica 87(4):1115–1153.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Akerlof GA (1980) A theory of social custom, of which unemployment may be one consequence. Quart. J. Econom. 94(4):749–775.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anaqua (2021) Anaqua consumer survey: The state of counterfeit goods. Accessed April 13, 2026, https://www.anaqua.com/resource/anaqua-consumer-survey-the-state-of-counterfeit-goods-blog/.Google Scholar
• Balboni C, Bandiera O, Burgess R, Ghatak M, Heil A (2022) Why do people stay poor? Quart. J. Econom. 137(2):785–844.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bellemare MF, Wichman CJ (2020) Elasticities and the inverse hyperbolic sine transformation. Oxford Bull. Econom. Statist. 82(1):50–61.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bénabou R, Tirole J (2004) Willpower and personal rules. J. Political Econom. 112(4):848–886.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Benabou R, Tirole J (2026) Laws and norms. J. Political Econom. 134(2):731–772..Google Scholar
• Bernheim BD (1994) A theory of conformity. J. Political Econom. 102(5):841–877.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bian X, Moutinho L (2009) An investigation of determinants of counterfeit purchase consideration. J. Bus. Res. 62(3):368–378.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Charles KK, Hurst E, Roussanov N (2009) Conspicuous consumption and race. Quart. J. Econom. 124(2):425–467.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisend M, Schuchert-Güler P (2006) Explaining counterfeit purchases: A review and preview. Acad. Marketing Sci. Rev. 12:1–25.Google Scholar
• European Union Intellectual Property Office (2023a) European citizens and intellectual property: Perception, awareness and behaviour (IP Perception Study 2023). Accessed April 13, 2026, https://www.euipo.europa.eu/en/publications/ip-perception-study-2023.Google Scholar
• European Union Intellectual Property Office (2023b) Choice experiment for the demand for counterfeits workstream: Final report. Technical report, European Union Intellectual Property Office, Alicante, Spain.Google Scholar
• Federal Research Division, Library of Congress (2020) U.S. Intellectual Property and Counterfeit Goods—Landscape Review of Existing/Emerging Research. Technical report, Library of Congress, Washington, DC. Prepared under an interagency agreement with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. https://www.uspto.gov/sites/default/files/documents/USPTO-Counterfeit.pdf.Google Scholar
• Fehr E, Schurtenberger I (2018) Normative foundations of human cooperation. Nature Hum. Behav. 2(7):458–468.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feltovich N, Harbaugh R, To T (2002) Too cool for school? Signalling and countersignalling. RAND J. Econom. 33(4):630–649. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fink C, Maskus KE, Qian Y (2016) The economic effects of counterfeiting and piracy: A review and implications for developing countries. World Bank Res. Observer 31(1):1–28.Google Scholar
• Fisman R, Wei SJ (2009) The smuggling of art, and the art of smuggling: Uncovering the illicit trade in cultural property and antiques. Amer. Econom. J. Appl. Econom. 1(3):82–96.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gneezy U, Kajackaite A, Sobel J (2018) Lying aversion and the size of the lie. Amer. Econom. Rev. 108(2):419–453.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grossman GM, Shapiro C (1988) Foreign counterfeiting of status goods. Quart. J. Econom. 103(1):79–100.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Han YJ, Nunes JC, Drèze X (2010) Signaling status with luxury goods: The role of brand prominence. J. Marketing 74(4):15–30.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nia A, Zaichkowsky JL (2000) Do counterfeits devalue the ownership of luxury brands? J. Product Brand Management 9(7):485–497. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2021a) Global trade in fakes: A worrying threat. Report, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development Publishing, Paris.Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2021b) Misuse of e-commerce for trade in counterfeits. Report, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris.Google Scholar
• Phillips DJ, Zuckerman EW (2001) Middle-status conformity: Theoretical restatement and empirical demonstration in two markets. Amer. J. Sociol. 107(2):379–429.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Qian Y (2008) Impacts of entry by counterfeiters. Quart. J. Econom. 123(4):1577–1609.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Qian Y (2014) Counterfeiters: Foes or friends? How counterfeits affect sales by product quality tier. Management Sci. 60(10):2381–2400.Link, Google Scholar
• Qian Y, Xie H (2014) Which brand purchasers are lost to counterfeiters? An application of new data fusion approaches. Marketing Sci. 33(3):437–448.Link, Google Scholar
• Reiss PC (2011) Structural workshop paper—Descriptive, structural, and experimental empirical methods in marketing research. Marketing Sci. 30(6):950–964.Link, Google Scholar
• Rutter J, Bryce J (2008) The consumption of counterfeit goods: ‘Here be pirates?’ Sociology 42(6):1146–1164.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tom G, Garibaldi B, Zeng Y, Pilcher J (1998) Consumer demand for counterfeit goods. Psych. Marketing 15(5):405–421.Crossref, Google Scholar
• U.S. Census Bureau (2023) American Community Survey (ACS). Accessed April 13, 2026, https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/acs.Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Homeland Security (2020) Combating trafficking in counterfeit and pirated goods. Technical report, Office of Strategy, Policy & Plans, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Justice (n.d.) 1709. Joint Statement—Parts C and D. Definitions—“Trafficking”—“Counterfeit Marks”. Criminal resource manual. Accessed April 13, 2026, https://www.justice.gov/archives/jm/criminal-resource-manual-1709-joint-statement-parts-c-and-d-definitions-trafficking-counterfeit.Google Scholar
• U.S. Government Accountability Office (2010) Observations on efforts to quantify the economic effects of counterfeit and pirated goods. Technical report, U.S. Government Accountability Office, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Wee CH, Ta SJ, Cheok KH (1995) Non-price determinants of intention to purchase counterfeit goods: An exploratory study. Internat. Marketing Rev. 12(6):19–46.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wilcox K, Kim HM, Sen S (2009) Why do consumers buy counterfeit luxury brands? J. Marketing Res. 46(2):247–259.Crossref, Google Scholar