The Mission of Marketing Science

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.21.1.1.162

References

  • Anderson Erin, Weitz Barton A. Determinants of continuity in conventional industrial channel dyads. Marketing Sci. (1989) 8(Fall):310–323LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Anderson Eugene W., Sullivan Mary W. The antecedents and consequences of customer satisfaction for firms. Marketing Sci. (1993) 12(2):125–143LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Armstrong J. Scott. Advocacy and objectivity in science. Management Sci. (1979) 25(5):423–428LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Armstrong J. Scott. Barriers to scientific contributions: The author's formula. Behavioral Brain Sci. (1982) 5(June):197–199CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Azbel Mark. Could Columbus have passed peer review? Phys. Today (1993) 46(6):13–15CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bakir Aysen, Vitell Scott J., Rose Gregory M. Publications in major marketing journals: An analysis of scholars and marketing departments. J. Marketing Education (2000) 22(2):99–107CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baumgartner Hans, Pieters Rik. The influence of marketing journals: A citation analysis of the discipline and its sub-areas. (2000) December(Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands) . Center for Economic Research, No.2000-123Google Scholar
  • Blank Rebecca M. The effects of double-blind versus single-blind reviewing: Experimental evidence from the American Economic Review. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1991) 81(5):1041–1067Google Scholar
  • Cole Stephen. Guardians of science: Fairness and reliability of peer review. Minerva (1998) 36(2):179–189CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Crane Diana. The gatekeepers of science: Some factors affecting the selection of articles for scientific journals. Amer. Sociologist (1967) 2(November):195–201Google Scholar
  • Daniel Hans Dieter. Guardians of Science: Fairness and Reliability of Peer Review (1993) (New York, VCH Publishers) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ellison Glenn. The slowdown of the economics publishing process. (2000) . National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc, Paper #7804Google Scholar
  • Gans Joshua S., Shepherd George B. How are the mighty fallen: Rejected classic articles by leading economists. J. Econom. Perspectives (1994) 8(1):165–179CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Garfield Eugene. Journal impact factor: A brief review. Canadian Med. Assoc. J. (1999) 161(8):979–980Google Scholar
  • Gonul Fusun, Srinivasan Kannan. Modeling multiple sources of heterogeneity in multinomial logit models: Methodological and managerial issues. Marketing Sci. (1993) 12(3):213–229LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Griffin Abbie, Hauser John R. The voice of the customer. Marketing Sci. (1993) 12(1):1–27LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Guadagni Peter, Little John D. C. A logit model of brand choice calibrated on scanner data. Marketing Sci. (1983) 2(3):203–238LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hamermesh Daniel S. Facts and myths about refereeing. J. Econom. Perspectives (1994) 8(1):153–163CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Harzing Anne-Wil. Bradford University School of Management: Journal Quality List. (2001) . Unpublished web document http://www.harzing.com.Google Scholar
  • Hardie Bruce, Johnson Eric J., Fader Peter. Reference dependence, loss aversion, and brand choice. Marketing Sci. (1993) 12(4):378–394LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hauser John. Editorial. Marketing Sci. (1989) 8(1Google Scholar
  • Hauser John. Editorial. Marketing Sci. (1994) 13(1Google Scholar
  • Hauser John, Shugan Steven M. Defensive marketing strategy. Marketing Sci. (1983) 2(4):319–360LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hawkins Robert G., Ritter Lawrence S., Walter Ingo. What economists think of their journals. J. Polit. Econom. (1973) 81CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jeuland Abel P., Shugan Steven M. Managing channel profits. Marketing Sci. (1983) 2(3):239–272LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Laband David N., Piette Michael J. Favoritism versus search for good papers: Empirical evidence regarding the behavior of journal editors. J. Polit. Econom. (1994) 102(1):194–203CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Laband David N. Is there value-added from the review process in economics? Preliminary evidence from authors. Quart. J. Econom. (1990) 105(2):341–352CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lynch John G., Alba Joseph W., Hutchinson J. Wesley. Presidential Address: Reviewing. Advances in Consumer Research (1998) XXV(Provo, Utah: Association for Consumer Research)11–16Google Scholar
  • Lynch John G., Ariely Dan. Wine online: Search costs and competition on price, quality, and distribution. Marketing Sci. (2000) 19(1):83–103LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Mahoney Michael J. Publication prejudices: An experimental study of confirmatory bias in the peer review system. Cognitive Therapy Res. (1977) 1(2):161–175CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Merton Robert K. The Matthew effect in science. Science (1968) 159(3810):56–63CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Morrison Donald. Editor's Farewell. Marketing Sci. (1982) 1(4LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Peters Douglas P., Ceci Stephen J. Peer-review practices of psychological journals: The fate of published articles, submitted again. Behav. Brain Sci. (1982) 5(2):187–195CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Polonsky Michael, Jones Gary, Kearsley Megan J. Accessibility: An alternative method of ranking marketing journals. J. Marketing Education (1999) 21(3):181–193CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ratchford Brian. Editorial. Marketing Sci. (2001) 20(1LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Shepherd George B.Rejected: Leading Economists Ponder the Publication Process. (1995) (Thomas Horton & Daughters, Sun Lakes, Arizona) Google Scholar
  • Shugan Steven M., Oliver Richard, Rust Roland. Explanations for service growth. Service Quality. (1994) (Sage Publications)223–240CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Staelin Richard. Editorial. Marketing Sci. (1995) 14(1):U2–U5Google Scholar
  • Staelin Richard. Editorial. Marketing Sci. (1996) 15(1):U4–U6Google Scholar
  • Staelin Richard. Editorial: A discussion of bait and switch. Marketing Sci. (1998a) 17(3):271–272LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Staelin Richard. Last reflections of the editor. Marketing Sci. (1998b) 17(4):297–300LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Staelin Richard. From courtroom to converse: My 30-year journey. Presented at the 15th Paul D. Converse Symposium (2000) (American Marketing Association Publications, Chicago, IL) Google Scholar
  • Starbuck W. Estimates of the 1996 impact ratings. (1996) . Unpublished web documentGoogle Scholar
  • Tellis Gerard J., Chandy Rajesh K., Ackerman David S. In search of diversity: The record of major marketing journals. J. Marketing Res. (1999) 36(1):120–131CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Thaler Richard. Mental accounting and consumer choice. Marketing Sci. (1985) 4(3):199–214LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Trieschmann James S., Dennis Alan R., Northcraft Gregory B., Niemi Albert W. Serving multiple constituencies in the business school: MBA program versus research performance. Acad. Management J. (2000) 43(6):1130–1141CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.