Editorial: Marketing Science, Models, Monopoly Models, and Why We Need Them

References

  • Anderson Eugene W., Sullivan Mary W. The antecedents and consequences of customer satisfaction for firms. Marketing Science (1993) 12(Spring):125–143LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Armstrong J. S., Brodie R. J., G. Parsons A. Hypotheses in Marketing Science: Literature review and publication audit. Marketing Lett. (2001) 12(Spring):171–187CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bartels Robert. Can marketing be a science? J. Marketing (1951) 15(Winter):319–328CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bartels Robert. The History of Marketing Thought (1976) ed. 2(Grid Inc., Columbus, OH) Google Scholar
  • Bass Frank. New product growth for model consumer durables. Management Sci. (1969a) 15(5):215–227LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bass Frank. Simultaneous equation regression study of advertising and sales of cigarettes. J. Marketing Res. (1969b) 6(3):291–300CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bass Frank, Parsons L. J. Simultaneous-equation regression analysis of sales and advertising. Appl. Econom. (1969) 1(2):103–124CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bester Helmut, Ritzberger Klaus. Strategic pricing, signaling, and costly information acquisition. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. (2001) 19(9):1347CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Binmore K., Rubinstein A., Wolinsky A. The Nash bargaining solution in economic modeling. Rand J. Econom. (1986) 17(2):176–188CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brickley James A., Dark Frederick H. The choice of organizational form-The case of franchising. J. Financial Econom. (1987) 18(2):401–420CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bulow Jeremy I., Huang Ming, Klemperer Paul D. Toeholds and takeovers. J. Political Econom. (1999) 107(3):427–454CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cason Timothy N., Sharma Tridib. Durable goods, Coasian dynamics, and uncertainty: Theory and experiments. J. Political Econom. (2001) 109(6):1311–1355CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Choi Jay Pil, Stefanadis Christodoulos. Tying, investment, and the dynamic leverage theory. Rand J. Econom. (2001) 32(1):52–71CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cox W. E. Product life cycles as marketing models. J. Bus. (1967) 40(4):375–384CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dekimpe M. G., Hanssens D. M. The persistence of marketing effects on sales. Marketing Sci. (1995) 14(Winter):1–21LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Einhorn H. J., Kleinmuntz D. N., Kleinmuntz B. Linear-regression and process-tracing models of judgment. Psych. Rev. (1979) 86(5):465–485CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Erdem Tulin, Keane Michael P. Decision-making under uncertainty: Capturing dynamic brand choice processes in turbulent consumer goods markets. Marketing Sci. (1996) 15(1):1–20LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Frank R. E., Massy W. F., Morrison D. G. Bias in multiple discriminant analysis. J. Marketing Res. (1965) 2(August):250–258CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lawrence Friedman. Game-theory models in the allocation of advertising expenditures. Oper. Res. (1958) 6(5):699–709LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gilbert Richard J., Klemperer Paul. An equilibrium theory of rationing. Rand J. Econom. (2000) 31(1):1–21CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gonul Fusun, Srinivasan Kannan. Modeling multiple sources of heterogeneity in multinomial logit-models—Methodological and managerial issues. Marketing Sci. (1993) 12(Summer):213–229, 1993LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Green Jerry R., Stokey Nancy L. A comparison of tournaments and contracts. J. Political Econom. (1983) 91(3):349–364CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Green P. E., Rao V. R. Rating scales and information recovery—How many scales and response categories to use. J. Marketing (1970) 34(3):33–39CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Griffin Abbie, Hauser John R. The voice of the customer. Marketing Sci. (1993) 12(Winter):1–27LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hauser John R., Russell R. The coming revolution in marketing theory. Marketing in an Electronic Age (1985) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA) 344–363Google Scholar
  • Holmstrom B. Moral hazard and observability. Bell J. Econom. (1979) 10(1):74–91CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kadiyali Vrinda, Chintagunta Pradeep, Vilcassim Naufel. Manufacturer-retailer channel interactions and implications for channel power: An empirical investigation of pricing in a local market. Marketing Sci. (2000) 19(2):127–148LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kahneman Daniel, Tversky Amos. Prospect theory—;Analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica (1979) 47(2):263–291CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kalyanaram Gurumurthy, Robinson William T., Urban Glen L. Order of market entry—Established empirical generalizations, emerging empirical generalizations, and future research. Marketing Sci. (1995) 14(3, Part 2):G212–G221LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Klemperer Paul. Auction theory: A guide to the literature. J. Econom. Surveys. (1999) 13(3):227–286CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kuehn Alfred A. Consumer brand choice as a learning process. J. Advertising Res. (1962) 2(4):10–17Google Scholar
  • Leeflang Peter S. H., Wittink Dick R., Wedel Michel, Naert Philippe A.Building Models for Marketing Decisions (2000) (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MA) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lilien Gary L. Model relativism: A situational approach to model building. Interfaces (1975) 5(3):11–18LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Little John D. C. Models and managers—Concept of a decision calculus. Management Sci. (1970) 16(8):B466–B485LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Little John, Murty Katta G., Sweeney Dura W., Karel Caroline. An algorithm for the traveling salesman problem. Oper. Res. (1963) 11(6):972–989LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Little John, Lodish Leonard M. A media planning calculus. Operations Research. Oper. Res. (1969) 17(1):1–36LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Mahajan Vijay, Eitan Muller, Frank Bass. Diffusion of new products: Empirical generalizations and managerial uses. Marketing Sci. (1995) 14(3, Part 2):G79–80LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Messinger Paul R., Chakravarthi Narasimhan. Has power shifted in the grocery channel? Marketing Sci. (1995) 14(Spring):189–223LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Milgrom Paul, John Roberts. Predation, reputation, and entry deterrence. J. Econom. Theory (1982) 27(2):280–312CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Milgrom Paul R., Weber Robert J. A theory of auctions and competitive bidding. Econometrica (1982) 50(5):1089–1122CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Moorthy Sridhar K. Using game theory to model competition. J. Marketing Res. (1985) 22(3):262–282CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Morrison Donald G. Interpretation of discriminant analysis. J. Marketing Res. (1969) 6(2):156–163CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Myerson Roger B. Nash equilibrium and the history of economic theory. J. Econom. Literature (1999) 37(3):1067–1083CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nalebuff Barry J., Stiglitz Joseph E. Prizes and incentives—Towards a general theory of compensation and competition. Bell J. Econom. (1983) 14(1):21–43CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ottaviani Marco. The value of public information In monopoly. Econometrica (2001) 69(6):1673–1684CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Padmanabhan Paddy, Ram Rao. Warranty policy and extended service contracts: Theory and an application to automobiles. Marketing Sci. (1993) 12(3):230–247LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Platt J. R. Strong inference: Certain systematic methods of scientific thinking may produce much more rapid progress than others. Science (1964) 146:347–353CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Popper K. R.The Logic of Scientific Discovery (1959) (Harper & Row, New York) Google Scholar
  • Riley John. Silver signals: Twenty-five years of screening and signaling. J. Econom. Literature (2001) 39(2):432–478CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rossi Peter E., McCulloch R. E., Allenby G. M. The value of purchase history data in target marketing. Marketing Science (1996) 15(4):321–340LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Rubin P. H. Theory of firm and structure of franchise contract. J. Law Econom. (1978) 21(1):223–233CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rubinstein A. Perfect equilibrium in a bargaining model. Econometrica (1982) 50(1):97–109CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shaffer Greg, John Zhang Z. Competitive coupon targeting. Marketing Sci. (1995) 14(Fall):395–416LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Sheth Jagdish N., Gardner David M., Garrett Dennis E.Marketing Theory: Evolution and Evaluation (1988) (John Wiley & Sons, New York) Google Scholar
  • Strotz R. H. Myopia and inconsistency in dynamic utility maximization. Rev. Econom. Stud. (1956) 23(62):165–180Google Scholar
  • Telser L. G. Why should manufacturers want fair trade? J. Law Econom. (1960) 3(Oct):86–105CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Telser L. G. Advertising and cigarettes. J. Political Econom. (1962) 70(5):471–499CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Thaler R. H., Shefrin H. M. An economic theory of selfcontrol. J. Political Econom. (1981) 89(2):392–406CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Thorburn W. M. Occam's razor. Mind (1915) 24:287–288CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Urban Glen L. Mathematical modeling approach to product line decisions. J. Marketing Res. (1969) 6(1):40–47CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Vickrey W. Counterspeculation, auctions, and competitive sealed tenders. J. Finance (1961) 16CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Vidale M. L., Wolfe H. B. An operations-research study of sales response to advertising. Oper. Res. (1957) 5(3):370–381LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Whinston M. D. Tying, foreclosure, and exclusion. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1990) 80(4):837–859Google Scholar
  • Winters P. R. Forecasting sales by exponentially weighted moving averages. Management Sci. (1960) 6(3):324–342LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Xie J., Shugan S. Electronic tickets, smart cards, and online prepayments: When and how to advance sell. Marketing Sci. (2001) 20(Summer):219–243LinkGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.