Modeling Consumer Demand for Variety

References

• Ainslie Andrew, Peter Rossi. Similarities in choice behavior across product categories. Marketing Sci. (1998) 17:91–106Link, Google Scholar
• Allenby Greg M., Peter Rossi. Marketing models of heterogeneity. J. Econom. (1999) 89:57–78Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arora Neeraj, Allenby Greg M., Ginter James L. A hierarchical Bayes model of primary and secondary demand. Marketing Sci. (1998) 17:29–44Link, Google Scholar
• Berry Steven, James Levinsohn, Ariel Pakes. Automobile prices in market equilibrium. Econometrica (1995) 63(4):841–890Crossref, Google Scholar
• Besanko D., Gupta S., Jain D. Logit demand estimation under competitive pricing behavior. Management Sci. (1998) 44:1533–1547Link, Google Scholar
• Bradlow E., Rao V. A hierarchical Bayes model for assortment choice. J. Marketing Res. (2000) 37:259–268Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chiang Jeongwon. A simultaneous approach to whether to buy, what to buy, and how much to buy. Marketing Sci. (1991) 4(Fall):297–314Link, Google Scholar
• Chib Sid, Edward Greenberg. Understanding the Metropolis-Hastings algorithm. Amer. Statistician (1995) 49(4):327–335Google Scholar
• Chintagunta Pradeep K. Investigating purchase incidence, brand choice and purchase quantity decisions of households. Marketing Sci. (1993) 12:194–208Link, Google Scholar
• Deaton A., Muelbauer J.Economics and Consumer Behavior (1980) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dube J. P.Multiple discreteness and the demand for carbonated soft drinks (1999) (Northwestern University, Evanston, IL) . Working paperGoogle Scholar
• Erdem T. Dynamic analysis of market structure based on panel data. Marketing Sci. (1996) 15(4 (Fall)):203–238Google Scholar
• Hajivassiliou V., McFadden D., Ruud P. Simulation of multivariate normal rectangle probabilities and their derivatives. J. Econometrics (1996) 72:85–134Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hanneman Michael. The discrete/continuous model of consumer demand. Econometrica (1984) 52:541–561Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hendel I. Estimating multiple-discrete choice models: An application to computerization returns. Rev. of Econom. Stud. (1999) 66:423–446Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahn B. E., Kalwani M., Morrison D. Measuring varietyseeking and reinforcement behaviors using panel data. J. Marketing Res. (1986) 23(May):89–100Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keane M. A computationally practical simulation estimator for panel data. Econometrica (1994) 62:95–116Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lattin James M., Leigh McAlister. Using a variety-seeking model to identify substitute and complementary relationships among competing products. J. Marketing Res. (1985) 22(August):330–339Crossref, Google Scholar
• Manchanda P., Ansari A., Gupta S. The “shopping basket”: A model for multicategory purchase incidence decisions. Marketing Sci. (1999) 18:95–114Link, Google Scholar
• McAlister Leigh. A dynamic attribute satiation model of variety-seeking behavior. J. Consumer Res. (1982) 9(September):141–151Crossref, Google Scholar
• McAlister Leigh, Edgar Pessemier. Variety seeking behavior: An interdisciplinary review. J. Consumer Res. (1982) 9(December):311–322Crossref, Google Scholar
• Metropolis N., Rosenbluth A. W., Rosenbluth M. N., Teller A. H., Teller E. Equations of state calculations by fast computing machines. J. Chemical Phys. (1953) 21:1087–1092Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nevo Aviv. Measuring market power in the ready-to-eat cereal industry. Econometrica (2001) 69:307–342Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rossi Peter, Robert McCulloch, Greg Allenby. On the value of household information in target marketing. Marketing Sci. (1996) 15:321–340Link, Google Scholar
• Wales T. J., Woodland A. D. Estimation of consumer demand systems with binding non-negative constraints. J. Econometrics (1983) 21:437–468Crossref, Google Scholar
• Walsh J. W. Flexibility in consumer purchasing for uncertain future tastes. Marketing Sci. (1995) 14:148–165Link, Google Scholar