Negotiations and Exclusivity Contracts for Advertising

References

• Anderson S., Coate S. Market provision of public goods: The case of broadcasting. (2002) . Working paper, University of VirginiaGoogle Scholar
• Baye M., Morgan J. A simple model of advertising and subscription fees. Econom. Lett. (2000) 69:345–351Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baye M., Morgan J. Information gatekeepers on the internet and the competitiveness of homogeneous product markets. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2001) 91(3):454–474Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dukes A. J. The advertising market in a product oligopoly. (2002) . Working paper GSIA, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PAGoogle Scholar
• Dutta S., Bergen M., John G. The governance of exclusive territories when dealers can bootleg. Marketing Sci. (1994) 13(1):83–99Link, Google Scholar
• Fruchter G. The many player advertising game. Management Sci. (1999) 45(11):1609–1611Link, Google Scholar
• Fruchter G., Kalish S. Closed–loop advertising strategies in a duopoly. Management Sci. (1997) 43(1):54–63Link, Google Scholar
• Gabszewicz J., Laussel D., Sonnac N. TV–broadcasting competition and advertising. (2001) . Working paper, COREGoogle Scholar
• Gal–Or E. Mergers and exclusionary practices in health care markets. J. Econom. Management Strategy (1999) 8(3):315–350Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gal–Or E., Dukes A. Minimum differentiation in commercial media markets. J. of Econom. Management Strategy (2003) . ForthcomingGoogle Scholar
• Grossman G., Shapiro C. Informative advertising with differentiated products. Rev. Econom. Stud. (1984) 51(1):63–81Crossref, Google Scholar
• Häckner J., Nyberg S. Price competition, advertising and media market concentration. (2000) . Working paper, Department of Economics, Stockholm University, Stockholm, SwedenGoogle Scholar
• Iyer G., Villas–Boas M. A bargaining theory of distribution channels. J. Marketing Res. (2003) . ForthcomingCrossref, Google Scholar
• Lal R., Villas–Boas J. M. Exclusive dealing and price promotions. J. Bus. (1996) 69:159–172Crossref, Google Scholar
• Naik P., Mantrala M., Sawyer A. Planning media schedules in the presence of dynamic advertising quality. Marketing Sci. (1998) 17(3):214–235Link, Google Scholar
• Nilssen T., Sørgard L. The TV advertising: Advertising and programming. (2001) . Working paper, University of Oslo, Oslo, NorwayGoogle Scholar
• OØBrien P., Shaffer G. Nonlinear supply contracts, exclusive dealing, and equilibrium foreclosure. J. Econom. and Management Strategy (1997) 6(4):755–785Crossref, Google Scholar
• Purohit D. Dual distribution channels: The competition between rental agencies and dealers. Marketing Sci. (1997) 16:228–245Link, Google Scholar
• Shaffer G. Bargaining in distribution channels with multi–product retailers. (2001) . Working paper W. E. Simon School of Business, University of Rochester, Rochester, NYGoogle Scholar
• Shaffer G., Zettelmeyer F. When good news about your rival is good for you: The effect of third–party information on the division of channel profits. Marketing Sci. (2002) 21(3):273–293Link, Google Scholar
• Siddarth S., Chattopadhyay A. To zap or not to zap: A study of the determinants of channel switching during commercials. Marketing Sci. (1998) 17(2):124–138Link, Google Scholar
• Siklos Richard D. They have it all now. Business Week (1999) September 20Google Scholar
• Silk A., Berndt E. Scale and scope effects on advertising agency costs. Marketing Sci. (1993) 12(1):53–72Link, Google Scholar
• Srivastava J., Chakravarti D., Rapoport A. Price and margin negotiations in marketing channels: An experimental study of sequential bargaining under one–sided uncertainty and opportunity cost of delay. Marketing Sci. (2000) 19(2):163–184Link, Google Scholar
• Villas–Boas J. M. Sleeping with the enemy: Should competitors share the same advertising agency? Marketing Sci. (1994) 13:190–202Link, Google Scholar
• von der Fehr N–H., Stevik K. Persuasive advertising and product differentiation. Southern J. Econom. (1998) 65(1):113–126Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vranica Suzanne. “After heated court battle, Pepsi Co. allows FCB to work on ads for Coca–Cola brands.”. Wall Street Journal (2001) November 23Google Scholar