R&D, Marketing, and the Success of Next-Generation Products

References

• Aaker David A., Kevin Lane Keller. Consumer evaluations of brand extensions. J. Marketing (1990) 54(1):27–41Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arthur Brian. Increasing returns and the new world of business. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1996) 74(4):100–109Google Scholar
• Barro J. Robert, Xavier Sala-i-Martin. Economic Growth (1995) (McGraw-Hill, New York) 254–259Google Scholar
• Bresnahan Timothy, Stern Scott, Trajtenberg Manuel. Market segmentation and the sources of rents from innovation: Personal computers in the late 1980's. RAND J. Econom. (1997) 28:S17–S44Crossref, Google Scholar
• Budd C., Harris C., Vickers J. A model of the evolution of duopoly: Does the asymmetry between firms tend to increase or decrease? Rev. Econom. Stud. (1993) 58:323–351Google Scholar
• Burgelman Robert A., Modesto Maidique A., Wheelright Steven C. Intel corporation (D): Microprocessors at the crossroads. Strategic Management of Technology and Innovation (1996) 2nd ed.(Irwin, Chicago, IL) 455–477Google Scholar
• Chandy Rajesh K., Tellis Gerard J. The incumbent's curse? Incumbency, size and radical product innovation. J. Marketing (2000) 64(3):1–17Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chauvin Keith, Mark Hirschey. Advertising, R&D expenditures and the market value of the firm. Financial Management (1993) 22(4):128–140Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dasgupta Partha, Stiglitz J. E., Mathewson G. F. The theory of technological competition. New Developments in the Analysis of Market Structure (1986) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) 519–549Crossref, Google Scholar
• Day George S. The capabilities of market-driven organizations. J. Marketing (1994) 58(October):37–52Crossref, Google Scholar
• Deshpandé Rohit. Sony Playstation2 (A) (2001) (Harvard Business School Case No. 9-502016, Harvard Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Dosi Giovanni. Sources procedures, and microeconomic effects of innovation. J. Econom. Lit. (1988) XXVI(3):1120–1171Google Scholar
• Dutta Shantanu, Narasimhan Om, Surrendra Rajiv. Success in high-technology markets: Is marketing capability critical? Marketing Sci. (1999) 18(4):547–568Link, Google Scholar
• Intel: The coming clash of logicThe Economist (1993) 328(7818(The Economist Group, London, U.K.) 21–23(July 3)Google Scholar
• Ericson Richard, Ariel Pakes. Markov-perfect industry dynamics: A framework for empirical work. Rev. Econom. Stud. (1995) 62(1):53–82Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fudenberg Drew, Jean Tirole. Game Theory (1998) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) 501–540Google Scholar
• Corporation Fujitsu. Quoted in von Braun 1997. The Innovation War (1994) . Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJGoogle Scholar
• Ghemawat Pankaj. Market incumbency and technological inertia. Marketing Sci. (1991) 10(2):161–171Link, Google Scholar
• Gilbert Richard, David Newbery. Preemptive patenting and the persistence of monopoly. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1982) 72(3):514–526Google Scholar
• Grabowski Henry G. The determinants of industrial research and development: A study of the chemical drug, and petroleum industries. J. Political Econom. (1968) 76(2):292–306Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grossman Gene M., Elhanan Helpman. Quality ladders and product cycles. Quart. J. Econom. (1991) 106(May):557–586Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hauser John R. Research development, and engineering metrics. Management Sci. (1998) 44(12, Part 1):1670–1689Link, Google Scholar
• Henderson Rebecca. Underinvestment and incompetence as responses to radical innovation: Evidence from the photolithographic alignment equipment industry. Rand J. Econom. (1993) 24(2):248–270Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henderson Rebecca, Iain Cockburn. Managing innovation in the information age. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1994a) January–February):100–105Google Scholar
• Henderson Rebecca, Iain Cockburn. Measuring competence? Exploring firm effects in pharmaceutical research. Strategic Management J. (1994b) 15:63–84Crossref, Google Scholar
• “Biggest problems” facing technology leadersRes. Tech. Management (2000) 43(September–October):15–16IRI-Industrial Research InstituteGoogle Scholar
• Levin R. C., Klevorick A. K., Nelson R. R., Winter S. G. Appropriating the returns from industrial R&D. Brookings Papers on Econom. Activity (1987) 1987(3):783–820Crossref, Google Scholar
• Malone Michael S.The Microprocessor: A Biography (1995) (Springer-Verlag, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mitchell Will. Whether and when? Probability and timing of incumbents' entry into emerging industrial subfields. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1989) 34(2):208–230Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nelson Richard R. Why do firms differ and how does it matter. Strategic Management J. (1991) 12:61–74Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ofek Elie. R&D marketing and the quest for industry leadership. (2000) . Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Graduate School of Business, Stanford University, Stanford, CAGoogle Scholar
• Park Chan Su, Srinivasan V. A survey based method for measuring and understanding brand equity and its extendibility. J. Marketing Res. (1994) 31(2):271–288Crossref, Google Scholar
• Purohit Devavrat. What should you do when your competitors send in the clones? Marketing Sci. (1994) Fall13:392–411Link, Google Scholar
• Reinganum Jennifer. Innovation and industry evolution. Quart. J. Econom. (1985) 100(1):81–99Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reinganum Jennifer. The timing of innovation: Research development, and diffusion. Handbook of Industrial Organization1(Elsevier Science Publishers, New York) 849–908Google Scholar
• Rogerson William P. The social costs of monopoly and regulation: A game-theoretic analysis. Bell J. Econom. (1982) 13(2):391–401Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schilling Melissa A. Technology adoption dominant design and new product development:. (1997) . A model of technological lock out and empirical test. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, UMI (#9819298), University of Washington, Seattle, WAGoogle Scholar
• Schumpeter Joseph A. Capitalism. Socialism and Democracy3rd ed.(Harper, New York) Google Scholar
• Shapiro Carl, Varian Hal R.Information Rules (1999) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA) 173–225Google Scholar
• Stokey Nancy L., Lucas Robert E.Recursive Methods in Economic Dynamics (1989) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Teece David J. Capturing value from knowledge assets: The new economy, markets for know-how, and intangible assets. California Management Rev. (1998) 40(3):55–78Crossref, Google Scholar
• Teece David, Gary Pisano J., Amy Shuen. Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management J. (1997) 18(7):509–533Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vickers John. The evolution of market structure when there is a sequence of innovations. J. Indust. Econom. (1986) XXXV(September):1–12Crossref, Google Scholar
• Villas-Boas J. Miguel. Dynamic duopolies with non-convex adjustment costs. Econom. Lett. (1992) 39:391–394Crossref, Google Scholar
• Villas-Boas J. Miguel. Predicting advertising pulsing policies in an oligopoly: A model and empirical test. Marketing Sci. (1993) 12(1):88–102Link, Google Scholar
• The best reputations in high techWall Street Journal (1999) November 18(Dow Jones & Company)B1Google Scholar
• Wernerfelt Birger. A resource based view of the firm. Strategic Management J. (1984) 5(2):171–180Crossref, Google Scholar