A Fuzzy Set Model of Search and Consideration with an Application to an Online Market

References

• Abramson Charles, Andrews Rick L., Currim Imran S., Morgan Jones. Parameter bias from unobserved effects in the multinomial logit model of consumer choice. J. Marketing Res. (2000) XXXVII(November):410–426Crossref, Google Scholar
• Alba Joseph W., John Lynch, Janiszewski Chris, Richard Lutz, Sawyer Alan, Stacy Wood. Interactive home shopping: Consumers, retailer, and manufacturer incentives to participate in electronic marketplaces. J. Marketing (1997) 61(July):38–53Crossref, Google Scholar
• Alba Joseph W., Wesley Hutchinson J. Dimensions of consumer expertise. J. Consumer Res. (1987) 13(March):411–454Crossref, Google Scholar
• Andrews Rick L., Srinivasan T. C. Studying consideration effects in empirical choice models using scanner panel data. J. Marketing Res. (1995) 32(February):30–41Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bettman James R.An Information Processing Theory of Consumer Choice (1979) (Addison–Wesley, Reading, MA) Google Scholar
• Bronnenberg Bart J., Vanhonacker Wilfried R. Limited choice sets, local price response, and implied measures of price competition. J. Marketing Res. (1996) 33(May):163–173Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bucklin Randolph E., Sunil Gupta. Brand choice, purchase incidence, and segmentation: An integrated modeling approach. J. Marketing Res. (1992) XXIX(May):201–215Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bucklin Randolph E., Lattin James M. A two–stage model of purchase incidence and brand choice. Marketing Sci. (1991) 10:24–39Link, Google Scholar
• Chiang Jeongwen, Siddhartha Chib, Narasimhan Chakravarthi. Markov chain Monte Carlo and models of consideration set and parameter heterogeneity. J. Econometrics (1999) 89(March/April):223–248Google Scholar
• Degeratu Alexandru, Rangaswamy Arvind, Jianan Wu. Consumer choice behavior in online and regular stores: The effects of brand name, price, and other search attributes. Internat. J. Res. Marketing (2000) 17(1):55–78Crossref, Google Scholar
• Desarbo Wayne S., Carpenter Gregory, Indrajit Sinha. A stochastic multidimensional unfolding approach for representing phased decision outcomes. Psychometrika (1996) 61(3):485–508Crossref, Google Scholar
• Desarbo Wayne S., Jianan Wu. The joint spatial representation of multiple variable batteries collected in marketing research. J. Marketing Res. (2001) 38(2):244–253Crossref, Google Scholar
• Finn Adam, Louviere Jordan. Shopping–center patronage models: Fashioning a consideration set segmentation solution. J. Bus. Res. (1990) 21:259–275Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fortheringham A. Stewart. Consumer store choice and choice set definition. Marketing Sci. (1988) 7(3):299–310Link, Google Scholar
• Gensch Dennis H. A two–stage disaggregate attribute choice model. Marketing Sci. (1987) 6(3):223–239Link, Google Scholar
• Guadagni Peter M., Little John D. C. A logit model of brand choice calibrated on scanner data. Marketing Sci. (1983) 2:203–238Link, Google Scholar
• Gupta S., Chintagunta P. K. On using demographic variables to determine membership in logit mixture models. J. Marketing Res. (1994) 31:128–136Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haubl Gerald, Trifts Valerie. Consumer decision making in online shopping environments: The effects of interactive decision aids. Marketing Sci. (2000) 19(1):4–21Link, Google Scholar
• Hauser John R. Testing the accuracy usefulness and significance of probabilistic choice models: An information theoretic approach. Oper. Res. (1978) 26(3):406–421Link, Google Scholar
• Hauser John R., Wernerfelt Birger. An evaluation cost model of consideration sets. J. Consumer Res. (1990) 16(March):393–408Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hauser John R., Urban Glen L., Weinberg Bruce D. How consumers allocate their time when searching for information. J. Marketing Res. (1993) 30(November):452–466Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kamakura Wagner A., Russell Gary J. A probabilistic choice model for market segmentation and elasticity structure. J. Marketing Res. (1989) 26(November):379–390Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kardes Frank R., Kalyanaram Gurumurthy, Chandrashekaran Murali, Dornoff Ronald J. Brand retrieval, consideration set composition, consumer choice, and the pioneering advantage. J. Consumer Res. (1993) 20(June):62–75Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee E. S., Li R. L. Comparison of fuzzy numbers on the probability measure of fuzzy events. Computer Math. Appl. (1988) 15:887–896Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lowen R.Fuzzy Set Theory: Basic Concepts Techniques and Bibliography (1997) (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands) Google Scholar
• Luce R.D.Individual Choice Behavior: A Theoretical Analysis (1959) (Wiley, New York) Google Scholar
• Lynch John G., Marmorstein Howard, Weigold Micheal F. Choice from sets including remembered brands: Use of recalled attributes and prior overall evaluations. J. Consumer Res. (1988) 15(September):169–184Crossref, Google Scholar
• McFadden Daniel, Zarembka P. Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. Frontiers in Econometrics (1974) (Academic Press, New York) 105–142Google Scholar
• Nedungadi Prakash. Recall and consumer consideration sets: Influencing choice without altering brand evaluations. J. Consumer Res. (1990) 17(December):263–276Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roberts John H., Lattin James M. Development and testing of a model of consideration set composition. J. Marketing Res. (1991) 28(November):429–440Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roberts John H., Lattin James M. Consideration: Review of research and prospects for future insights. J. Marketing Res. (1997) 34(August):406–410Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roberts John H., Urban Glen. Modeling multiattribute utility, risk, and belief dynamics for new consumer durable brand choice. Management Sci. (1988) 34(February):167–185Link, Google Scholar
• Rust T. Roland, Jeffrey Inman J., Jianmin Jia, Zahorik Anthony. What you don’t know about customer perceived quality: The role of customer expectation distributions. Marketing Sci. (1999) 18(1):77–92Link, Google Scholar
• Shocker Allan D., Ben-Akiva Moshe, Boccara Bruno, Prakash Nedungadi. Consideration set influences on consumer decision–making and choice: Issues, models, and suggestions. Marketing Lett. (1991) 2(3):181–197Crossref, Google Scholar
• Siddarth S., Bucklin Randolph E., Donald Morrison. Making the cut: Modeling and analyzing choice set restriction in scanner panel data. J. Marketing Res. (1995) 32(August):255–266Crossref, Google Scholar
• Swait Joffrey, Ben-Akiva Moshe. Incorporating random constraints in discrete models of choice set generation. Transportation Res. B (1987) 21B(2):91–102Crossref, Google Scholar
• Swait Joffrey, Louviere Jordan. The role of the scale parameter in the estimation and comparison of multinomial logit model. J. Marketing Res. (1993) 30(August):305–314Crossref, Google Scholar
• Swait Joffrey, Stacey Craig. The role of consumer brand assessment and assessment confidence in models of longitudinal choice behavior. 1996 INFORMS Marketing Sci. Conf. (1996) March 1996University of Florida, Gainesville, FLGoogle Scholar
• Tversky Amos. Elimination-by-aspects: A theory of choice. Psych. Rev. (1972) 79(July):281–299Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wedel Michel, Kamakura Wagner A.Market Segmentation: Conceptual and Methodological Foundations (1998) (ISQM, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands) Google Scholar
• Wu Jianan. A fuzzy set model of consideration set formation: Theory methodology, and calibration using data from an online supermarket. (1998) . Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PAGoogle Scholar