Editorial: Journal Rankings: Save the Outlets for Your Research

References

  • Allenby Greg M., Shively Thomas S., Yang Sha, Garratt Mark J. A choice model for packaged goods: Dealing with discrete quantities and quantity discounts. Marketing Sci. (2003) 23(2Google Scholar
  • Armstrong J. S., Sperry Tad. The ombudsman: Business school prestige—Research versus teaching. Interfaces (1994) 24(2):13–43LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Banerjee B., Bandyopadhyay Subir. Advertising competition under consumer inertia. Marketing Sci. (2003) 22(1):131–144LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Baumgartner H., Pieters Rik. The structural influence of marketing journals: A citation analysis of the disciplines and its subareas over time. J. Marketing (2003) 67(2):123–139CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eliashberg Jehoshua, Shugan Steven M. Film critics: Influencers or predictors. J. Marketing (1997) 61(2):68–78CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chatterjee P., Hoffman Donna L., Novak Thomas P. Modeling the clickstream: Implications for Web-based advertising efforts. Marketing Sci. (2003) 22(4):520–541LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Danaher Peter J., Wilson Isaac W., Davis Robert. A comparison of online and offline consumer brand loyalty. Marketing Sci. (2003) 22(4):461–476LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hovav Anat, Gray Paul. YEAR. Future penetration of academic electronic journals: Four scenarios. Information Systems Frontiers4(2):229–244CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Iyer Ganesh, Pazgal Amit. Internet shopping agents: Virtual co-location and competition. Marketing Sci. (2003) 22(1):85–96LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kahn Barbara E., Frances Luce Mary. Understanding high-stakes consumer decisions: Mammography adherence following false alarm test results. Marketing Sci.22(3):393–410LinkGoogle Scholar
  • MacRoberts Michael H., MacRoberts Barbara R. Problems of citation analysis: A critical review. J. Amer. Soc. Information Sci. (1989) 40(5):342–349CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rao Akshay R., Mahi Humaira. The price of launching a ew product: Empirical evidence on factors affecting the relative magnitude of slotting allowances. Marketing Sci. (2003) 22(2):246–268LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Rossi Peter E., Allenby Greg M. Bayesian statistics and marketing. Marketing Sci. (2003) 22(3):304–328LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Schatz Martin. What's wrong with MBA ranking surveys. Management Res. News (1993) 16(7):15–18CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shugan Steven M. Defining interesting research problems. Marketing Sci. (2003) 22(1):1–15LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Slagell J. The good the bad, and the ugly: Evaluating electronic journals. Comput. Libraries (2001) 21(5):34–38Google Scholar
  • Swait Joffre, Andrews Rick L. Enriching scanner panel models with choice experiments. Marketing Sci. (2003) 22(4):442–460LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Tellis Gerard J., Stremersch Stefan, Yin Eden. The international takeoff of new products: The role of economics, culture and country innovativeness. Marketing Sci. (2003) 22(2):188–208LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Toubia Olivier, Simester Duncan I., Hauser John R., Dahan Ely. Fast polyhedral adaptive conjoint estimation. Marketing Sci. (2003) 22(3):273–303LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Tracy Joseph, Waldfogel Joel. The best business schools: A market-based approach. J. Bus. (1997) 70(1):1–31CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Trieschmann James S., Dennis Alan R., Northcraft Gregory B., Niemi Albert W. Serving multiple constituencies in business schools: M.B.A. program versus research performance. Acad. Management J. (2000) 43(6):1130–1141CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Vastag Gyula, Montabon Frank. Journal characteristics, rankings and social acculturation in operations management. Omega (2002) 30(2):109–126CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zell Deone. The market-driven business school: Has the pendulum swung too far? J. Management Inquiry (2001) 10(4):324–338CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.