Enriching Scanner Panel Models with Choice Experiments

References

• Abramson Charles, Andrews Rick L., Currim Imran S., Jones Morgan. Parameter bias from unobserved effects in the multinomial logit model of consumer choice. J. Marketing Res. (2000) 37(November):410–426Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ainslie Andrew, Rossi Peter E. Similarities in choice behavior across product categories. Marketing Sci. (1998) 17(2):91–106Link, Google Scholar
• Allenby Greg M. Hypothesis testing with scanner data: The advantage of Bayesian methods. J. Marketing Res. (1990) 27(November):379–389Crossref, Google Scholar
• Andrews Rick L., Currim Imran S. Identifying segments with identical choice behaviors across product categories: An intercategory logit mixture model. Internat. J. Res. Marketing (2002) 19(March):65–79Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ben-Akiva Moshe, Lerman Steve. Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Predict Travel Demand (1985) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Blamey R. K., Bennett J. W., Morrison M. D., Louviere J. J., Bennett J. W., Blamey R. K. A choice experiment of green product choice. Environmental Choice Modelling (2001) (Edward Elgar, Northampton, MA) 115–132Google Scholar
• Blamey R. K., Bennett J. W., Louviere J. J., Morrison M. D., Bennett J. W., Blamey R. K. Yea-saying and validation of a choice model of green product choice. Environmental Choice Modelling (2001) (Edward Elgar, Northampton, MA) 178–201Google Scholar
• Brownstone David, Bunch David, Kenneth Train. Joint mixed logit models of stated and revealed preferences for alternativefuel vehicles. Transportation Res. Part B (2000) 34:315–338Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bucklin Randolph E., Gupta Sunil. Brand choice, purchase incidence, and segmentation: An integrated approach. J. Marketing Res. (1992) 29(May):201–215Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bucklin Randolph E., Gupta Sunil. Commercial use of UPC scanner data: Industry and academic perspectives. Marketing Sci (1999) 18(3):247–273Link, Google Scholar
• Bucklin Randolph E., Gupta Sunil, Siddarth S. Determining segmentation in sales response across consumer purchase behaviors. J. Marketing Res. (1998) 34(May):189–197Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burke Raymond R., Harlam Bari A., Kahn Barbara E., Lodish Leonard M. Comparing dynamic consumer choice in real and computer-simulated environments. J. Consumer Res. (1992) 19(June):71–82Crossref, Google Scholar
• Deighton J., Henderson C., Neslin Scott. The effects of advertising on brand switching and repeat purchasing. J. Marketing Res. (1994) 31(February):28–43Crossref, Google Scholar
• Erdem Tülin, Keane Michael P. Decision-making under uncertainty: Capturing dynamic brand choice processes in turbulent consumer goods markets. Marketing Sci (1996) 15(1):1–20Link, Google Scholar
• Erdem Tülin, Keane Michael P., Sun Baohong. Missing price and coupon availability in scanner panels: Correcting for the self-selection bias in choice model parameters. J. Econometrics (1999) 89(1):177–196Google Scholar
• Fader Peter, Hardie Bruce. Modeling consumer choice among UPCs. J. Marketing Res. (1996) 33(November):442–452Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gönül Füsun, Srinivasan Kannan. Modeling multiple sources of heterogeneity in multinomial logit models: Methodological and managerial issues. Marketing Sci (1993) 12(Summer):213–229Link, Google Scholar
• Green Paul, Srinivasan V. Conjoint analysis in consumer research: Issues and outlook. J. Consumer Res. (1978) 1:61–68Crossref, Google Scholar
• Green Paul, Srinivasan V. Conjoint analysis in marketing research: New developments and directions. J. Marketing (1990) 54(4):3–19Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guadagni P., Little John. A logit model of brand choice calibrated on scanner data. Marketing Sci. (1983) 2(3):203–238Link, Google Scholar
• Gupta Sachin, Chintagunta Pradeep K. On using demographic variables to determine segment membership in logit mixture models. J. Marketing Res. (1994) 31(February):128–136Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gupta Sachin, Chintagunta Pradeep K., Kaul Anil, Wittink Dick R. Do household scanner data provide representative inferences from brand choices: A comparison with store data. J. Marketing Res. (1996) 33(November):383–398Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gupta Sunil. Impact of sales promotions on when, what, and how much to buy. J. Marketing Res. (1988) 25(November):342–355Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hensher David, Louviere Jordan, Swait Joffre. Combining sources of preference data. J. Econometrics (1999) 89(1–2):197–221Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keane Michael P. Current issues in discrete choice modeling. Marketing Lett. (1997) 8(3):307–322Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim Byong-Do, Rossi Peter E. Purchase frequency, sample selection, and price sensitivity: The heavy user bias. Marketing Lett (1994) 5(1):57–67Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lazari Andreas G., Anderso Donald A. Designs of discrete choice set experiments for estimating both attribute and availability cross effects. J. Marketing Res. (1994) 31(August):375–383Crossref, Google Scholar
• Louviere Jordan, Hensher David, Swait Joffre. Stated Choice Methods: Analysis and Applications in Marketing, Transportation and Environmental Valuation (2000) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Louviere Jordan, Woodworth George. Design and analysis of simulated consumer choice or allocation experiments: An approach based on aggregate data. J. Marketing Res. (1983) 20(November):350–367Crossref, Google Scholar
• McFadden Daniel, Train Kenneth. Mixed MNL models for discrete response. J. Appl. Econometrics (2000) 15(5):447–470Crossref, Google Scholar
• Morikawa Takayuki. Incorporating Stated Preference Data in Travel Demand Analysis (1989) . Ph.D. dissertation. Department of Civil Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
• Morwitz Vicki, Schmittlein David. Using segmentation to improve sales forecasts based on purchase intent: Which intenders actually buy. J. Marketing Res. (1992) 29(November):391–405Crossref, Google Scholar
• Morwitz Vicki, Steckel Joel, Gupta Alok. When do purchase intentions predict sales. (1999) . Working paper. Stern School of Business, New York University, New YorkGoogle Scholar
• Ohler Tobias, Lec Aihong, Louviere Jordan, Swait Joffre. Attribute range effects in binary response tasks. Marketing Lett (2000) 11(3):249–260Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rossi Peter E., Allenby Greg M. A Bayesian approach to estimating household parameters. J. Marketing Res. (1993) 30(May):171–182Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sándor Zsolt, Wedel Michel. Profile construction in experimental choice designs for mixed logit models. Marketing Sci (2002) 21(4):455–475Link, Google Scholar
• Swait Joffre. A non-compensatory choice model incorporating attribute cutoffs. Transportation Res. Part B (2001) 35:903–928Crossref, Google Scholar
• Swait Joffre, Adamowicz Wiktor. Choice complexity and decision strategy selection. J. Consumer Res. (2001a) 28(June):135–148Crossref, Google Scholar
• Swait Joffre, Adamowicz Wiktor. Choice environment, market complexity, and consumer behavior: A theoretical and empirical approach for incorporating decision complexity into models of consumer choice. Organ. Behavior Human Decision Processes (2001b) 86(2):141–167Crossref, Google Scholar
• Swait Joffre, Bernardino Adriana. Distinguishing taste variation from error structure in discrete choice data. Transportation Res. Part B (2000) 34(1):1–15Crossref, Google Scholar
• Swait Joffre, Louviere Jordan. The role of the scale parameter in the estimation and use of multinomial logit models. J. Marketing Res. (1993) 30(August):305–314Crossref, Google Scholar
• Swait Joffre, Louviere Jordan, Williams Michael. A sequential approach to exploiting the combined strengths of SP and RP data: Application to freight shipper choice. Transportation (1994) 21(2):135–152Crossref, Google Scholar
• Toubia Olivier, Simester Duncan I., Hauser John R., Dahan Ely. Fast polyhedral adaptive conjoint estimation. Marketing Sci (2003) 22(3):273–303Link, Google Scholar
• Winer Russell S. Experimentation in the 21st century: The importance of external validity. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. (1999) 27(3):349–358Crossref, Google Scholar