Modeling the Clickstream: Implications for Web-Based Advertising Efforts

References

  • Allenby Greg M., Rossi Peter E. Marketing models of consumer heterogeneity. J. Econom. (1999) 89:57–78CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ariely Dan. Controlling the information flow: Effects on consumers' decision making and preferences. J. Consumer Res. (2000) 27(2):233–248CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Batra Ravi, Ray Michael L. Situational effects of advertising repetition: The moderating influence of motivation, ability and opportunity to respond. J. Consumer Res. (1986) 12:432–445CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ben-Akiva Moshe, Lerman Steven R.Discrete Choice Analysis (1985) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Benway J. P. Banner blindness: The irony of attention grabbing on the World Wide Web. Proc. Human Factors and Ergonomics Soc. 42nd Annual Meeting (1998) 1:463–467CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Berlyne. Novelty, complexity, and hedonic value. Perception Psychophysics (1970) 8:279–286CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bettman James. An Information Processing Theory of Consumer Choice (1979) (Addison Wesley, Reading, MA) Google Scholar
  • Bicknell Craig. Net ad rates continue to fall. Wired News (1999) January 25). http://www.wired.com/news/business/story/17520.htmlGoogle Scholar
  • Breslow N. E., Clayton D. G. Approximate inference in generalized linear mixed models. J. Amer. Statist. Association (1993) 88:9–25Google Scholar
  • Briggs Rex, Hollis Nigel. Advertising on the Web: Is there response before click-through? J. Advertising Res. (1997) 37(2):33–45Google Scholar
  • Browne W. J., Draper D. A comparison of Bayesian and likelihood methods for fitting multilevel models. Bayesian and Likelihood Methods in Multilevel Modeling (2003) . ForthcomingGoogle Scholar
  • Bryk A. S., Raudenbush S. W., Congdon R. T.Hierarchical Linear and Nonlinear Modelling with the HLM12L and HLM13L Programs (1996) (Scientific Software International, Inc., Chicago, IL) Google Scholar
  • Buchanan Bruce, Morrison Donald G. A stochastic model of list falloff with implications for repeat mailings. J. Direct Marketing (1985) 2(3):7–14CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Calder Bobby J., Sternthal Brian. Television commercial wearout: An information processing view. J. Marketing Res. (1980) 17(May):173–186CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chatterjee Patrali. Modeling consumer network navigation at World Wide Web sites—Implications for advertising. (1998) . Doctoral dissertation Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TNGoogle Scholar
  • Chen Yuxin, Iyer Ganesh. Consumer addressability and customized pricing. Marketing Sci. (2002) 21(2):197–208LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chintagunta Pradeep K., Jain Dipak C., Vilcassim Naufel J. Investigating heterogeneity in brand preferences in logit models for panel data. J. Marketing Res. (1991) 28(November):417–428CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Frequency and Banner BurnoutDoubleClick (1996) . http://www.doubleclick.net/nf/general/frequset.htmGoogle Scholar
  • Dreze Xavier, Hussherr Francois. Internet advertising: is anybody watching. J. Interactive Marketing (2003) 17(4). ForthcomingCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • eMarketerEssential e-Business Numbers for Marketers, Q3. (2002) October(New York)Google Scholar
  • eMarketerThe eAdvertising Report. (2001) April(New York)Google Scholar
  • Gatignon H., Reibstein D. Pooling logit models. J. Marketing Res. (1986) 23(August):281–285CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Goldstein Harvey. Multilevel Statistical Models (1995) 2nd(Edward Arnold, London) Google Scholar
  • Greenwald Anthony G., Leavitt Clark. Audience involvement in advertising: Four levels. J. Consumer Res. (1984) 11(June):581–592CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hanson Ward. Internet Marketing (2000) (South-Western Publishing, Cincinnati, OH) Google Scholar
  • Hoffman Donna L., Novak Thomas P., Peralta Marcos A. Building consumer trust in online environments: The case for information privacy. Comm. ACM (1999) 42(4):80–85CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hoffman Donna L., Novak Thomas P. Acquiring customers on the Web. Harvard Bus. Rev. (2000) May-June):179–188Google Scholar
  • Hoffman Donna L., Novak Thomas P. Marketing in hypermedia computer-mediated environments: Conceptual foundations. J. Marketing (1996) 60(July):50–68CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lynch John G., Ariely Dan. Wine online: Search costs affect competition on price, quality and distribution. Marketing Sci (2000) 19(1):83–103LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Huberman Bernado A., Pirolli Peter L. T., Pitkow James E., Lukose Rajan M. Strong regularities in World Wide Web surfing. Science (1998) 280(5360):95–97CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Janiszewski Chris. Preattentive mere exposure effects. J. Consumer Res. (1993) 20(December):376–392CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jones J. Morgan, Landwehr Jane T. Removing heterogeneity bias from logit model estimation. Marketing Sci. (1988) 7(1):41–59LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Jupiter Research Jupiter Research Internet Advertising Model, 7/03 (US only). (2003) Google Scholar
  • King Gary, Zeng Langche. Logistic regression in rare events data. Political Anal. (2000) 92:1–27Google Scholar
  • MacInnis Deborah J., Moorman Christine, Jaworski Bernard J. Enhancing and measuring consumers' motivation, opportunity, and ability to process brand information from ads. J. Marketing (1991) 55(October):32–53CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mitchell Andrew A., Harris R. Cognitive processes initiated by exposure to advertising. Information Processing Research in Advertising. (1983) (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ) 13–42Google Scholar
  • Morrison Donald G. On the interpretation of discriminant analysis. J. Marketing Res. (1969) 6(May):156–163CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Novak T. P., Hoffman D. L., Yung Y. F. Measuring the customer experience in online environments: A structural modeling approach. Marketing Sci. (2000) 19(1):22–44LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Pechmann Cornelia, Stewart David W., Leigh James H., Martin R. Advertising repetition: A critical review of wearin and wearout. Current Issues and Research in Advertising 1988. (1989) (Claude University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI) 285–329Google Scholar
  • Peterman Michelle L., Roehm Harper A., Haugtvedt Curtis P. An exploratory attribution analysis of attitudes toward the World Wide Web as a product information source. Adv. Consumer Res. (1999) 26:75–79Google Scholar
  • Pieters Rik, Rosbergen Edward, Wedel Michel. Visual attention to repeated print advertising: A test of scanpath theory. J. Marketing Res. (1999) 36(December):305–314Google Scholar
  • Revelt D., Train K. Mixed logit with repeated choices: Households choices of appliance efficiency level. Rev. Econom. Statist. (1998) 80(4):647–657CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rodriguez G., Goldman N. An assessment of estimation procedures for multilevel models with binary responses. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. (1995) A(158):73–89CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rosbergen Edward, Pieters Rik, Wedel Michel . Visual attention to advertising: A segment-level analysis. J. Consumer Res. (1997) 24(December):305–314CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schroeder Will. Testing Web sites with eye-tracking. User Interface Engineering—Eye for Design (1998) 5(5):3–4Google Scholar
  • Sen Shahana, Padmanabhan Balaji, Tuzhilin Alexander, White Norman H., Stein Roger. The identification and satisfaction of consumer analysis-driven information needs of marketers on the WWW. Eur. J. Marketing (1998) 32(7-8):688–702CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sohn Dongyoung, Leckenby John D. Locus of control and interactive advertising. (2001) . Paper presented at the 2001 Annual Conference of the American Academy of Advertising, Salt Lake City, Utah, March. http://www.ciadvertising.org/studies/reports/info_process/locus.htmGoogle Scholar
  • Tedeschi Bob. DoubleClick puts off plan for wider use of personal data. New York Times on the Web (2000) . March 2, Business Desk. www.nytimes.com/Google Scholar
  • Train K. E. Recreation demand models with taste variation over people. Land Econom. (1998) 74(2):230–239CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.