My Fair AI: Accuracy Parity and Strategic Identity Disclosure in AI Content Recommendation
References
- (2019) Beyond personalization: Research directions in multistakeholder recommendation. Preprint, submitted May 1, https://arxiv.org/abs/1905.01986.Google Scholar
- (2018) A reductions approach to fair classification. Dy J, Krause A, eds. Proc. Internat. Conf. Machine Learn. (PMLR, Cambridge, MA), 60–69.Google Scholar
- (2016) Recommender Systems, vol. 1 (Springer, Cham, Switzerland).Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2021) Media platforms’ content provision strategies and sources of profits. Marketing Sci. 40(3):527–547.Link, Google Scholar
- (2017) Fairness in machine learning. Nips Tutorial 1:2.Google Scholar
- (2021) Protecting the protected group: Circumventing harmful fairness. Proc. AAAI Conf. Artificial Intelligence 35:5176–5184.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2022) The creator economy: Managing ecosystem supply, revenue sharing, and platform design. Management Sci. 68(7):5233–5251.Link, Google Scholar
- (2020) Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, and Deep Learning (Mercury Learning and Information, Duxbury, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2024) How does competition affect exploration vs. exploitation? A tale of two recommendation algorithms. Management Sci. 70(2):1029–1051.Link, Google Scholar
- (2022) A clarification of the nuances in the fairness metrics landscape. Sci. Rep. 12(1):4209.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2023) Bias and debias in recommender system: A survey and future directions. ACM Trans. Inform. Systems 41(3):1–39.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2019) Monetizing online marketplaces. Marketing Sci. 38(6):948–972.Abstract, Google Scholar
- (2023) The measure and mismeasure of fairness. J. Machine Learn. Res. 24(1):14730–14846.Google Scholar
- (2017) Algorithmic decision making and the cost of fairness. Proc. 23rd ACM SIGKDD Internat. Conf. Knowledge Discovery Data Mining (ACM, New York), 797–806.Google Scholar
- (2016) Deep neural networks for youtube recommendations. Sen S, Geyer W, Freyne J, Castells P, eds. Proc. 10th ACM Conf. Recommender Systems (ACM, New York), 191–198.Google Scholar
- (2018) Allowing consumers to bundle themselves: The profitability of family plans. Marketing Sci. 37(6):953–969.Link, Google Scholar
- European Parliament and Council of the European Union (2024) Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 of the European Parliament and of the Council on Artificial Intelligence (AI Act). Accessed February 8, 2025, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1689/oj/eng.Google Scholar
- Fortune (2025) How much is TikTok worth—And who’s serious about buying it? Retrieved March 18, https://fortune.com/2025/01/16/how-much-tiktok-worth-who-serious-about-buying/.Google Scholar
- (2020a) AI and algorithmic bias: Source, detection, mitigation and implications. Detection, Mitigation and Implications (July 26, 2020).Google Scholar
- (2020b) Artificial intelligence and algorithmic bias: Source, detection, mitigation, and implications. Pushing the Boundaries: Frontiers in Impactful OR/OM Research (INFORMS, Cantonsville, MD), 39–63.Google Scholar
- (2022) “Un”fair machine learning algorithms. Management Sci. 68(6):4173–4195.Link, Google Scholar
- (2021) Predicting consumers’ choices in the age of the internet, AI, and almost perfect tracking: Some things change, the key challenges do not. Consumer Psych. Rev. 4(1):135–152.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2021) Questioning racial and gender bias in AI-based recommendations: Do espoused national cultural values matter? Inform. Systems Frontiers 1–17.Google Scholar
- (2019) An empirical analysis of data deletion and opt-out choices on 150 websites. Proc. 15th Sympos. Usable Privacy Security, Santa Clara, CA, 387–406.Google Scholar
- (2016) Equality of opportunity in supervised learning. Proc. 30th Internat. Conf. Neural Inform. Processing Systems (Curran Associates Inc., Red Hook, NY), 3323–3331.Google Scholar
- (2022) How TikTok’s algorithm made it a success: ‘it pushes the boundaries’. Retrieved May 17, https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2022/oct/23/tiktok-rise-algorithm-popularity.Google Scholar
- (2021) Compensating online content producers: A theoretical analysis. Management Sci. 67(11):7075–7090.Link, Google Scholar
- (2023) Tailoring recommendation algorithms to ideal preferences makes users better off. Sci. Rep. 13(1):9325.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2022) Hated that video? Youtube’s algorithm might push you another just like it. Retrieved March 13, https://www.technologyreview.com/2022/09/20/1059709/youtube-algorithm-recommendations/.Google Scholar
- (2019) Algorithmic bias? An empirical study of apparent gender-based discrimination in the display of stem career ads. Management Sci. 65(7):2966–2981.Link, Google Scholar
- (2025) Fair collaborative learning (FairCL): A method to improve fairness amid personalization. INFORMS J. Data Sci. 4(1):67–84.Link, Google Scholar
- (2024) Platform manipulation in online retail marketplace with sponsored advertising. Marketing Sci. 43(2):317–345.Link, Google Scholar
- (2022) Instagram will survey us users about race to assess if it is ‘fair and equitable’. Retrieved March 13, https://techcrunch.com/2022/07/28/instagram-race-survey/.Google Scholar
- (2019) Characterizing bias in classifiers using generative models. Wallach H, Larochelle H, Beygelzimer A, d’Alché-Buc F, Fox E, Garnett R, eds. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 32 (Curran Associates, Inc., Red Hook, NY).Google Scholar
- (2023) Digital hermits. NBER Working Paper No. 30920, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
- (2020) Recommender systems and their ethical challenges. AI Soc. 35(4):957–967.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2022) Revisiting popularity and demographic biases in recommender evaluation and effectiveness. Hagen M, Verberne S, Macdonald C, Seifert C, Balog K, Nørvåg K, Setty V, eds. Proc. Eur. Conf. Inform. Retrieval (Springer, Cham, Switzerland), 641–654.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2022) Data deserts and black boxes: The impact of socio-economic status on consumer profiling. Technical report, MIT, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
- (2018) Algorithms of oppression. Algorithms of Oppression (New York University Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2016) Weapons of Math Destruction: How Big Data Increases Inequality and Threatens Democracy (Broadway Books, New York).Google Scholar
- (2018) Pinterest wants to diversify your search results. Retrieved May 30, https://www.wired.com/story/pinterest-skin-tone-search/.Google Scholar
- (2024) Tiktok could soon be sold. Here’s how much it’s worth and who could buy it. Retrieved March 18, https://www.cbsnews.com/news/how-much-is-tiktok-worth-2024/.Google Scholar
- (2022) How much is privacy worth around the world and across platforms? J. Econom. Management Strategy 31(4):841–861.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2021) Consumers and artificial intelligence: An experiential perspective. J. Marketing 85(1):131–151.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2024) Digital content creation: An analysis of the impact of recommendation systems. Management Sci. 70(12):8668–8684.Link, Google Scholar
- (2023) Disentangling and operationalizing AI fairness at Linkedin. Proc. ACM Conf. Fairness Accountability Transparency (ACM, New York), 1213–1228.Google Scholar
- (2024) Advertising and content creation on digital content platforms. Marketing Sci. 43(4):734–750.Link, Google Scholar
- (2020) Ageism in the era of digital platforms. Convergence 26(5–6):1074–1087.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2019) Captivating algorithms: Recommender systems as traps. J. Material Culture 24(4):421–436.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2021) How Tiktok reads your mind. Retrieved September 23, https://www.nytimes.com/2021/12/05/business/media/tiktok-algorithm.html.Google Scholar
- (2013) Ad revenue and content commercialization: Evidence from blogs. Management Sci. 59(10):2314–2331.Link, Google Scholar
- UNESCO (2021) Recommendation on the ethics of artificial intelligence. Accessed May 22, 2025, https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000381137.locale=en.Google Scholar
- (2018) Fairness definitions explained. Proc. Internat. Workshop Software Fairness (ACM, New York), 1–7.Google Scholar
- (2022) Algorithmic transparency with strategic users. Management Sci. 69(4):2297–2317.Google Scholar
- World Economic Forum (2021) A holistic guide to approaching AI fairness in education in organizations. Accessed May 22, 2025, https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_A_Holistic_Guide_to_Approaching_AI_Fairness_Education_in_Organizations_2021.pdf.Google Scholar
- (2026) Is fair advertising good for platforms? Marketing Sci. 45(1):34–44.Link, Google Scholar
- (2017) Fairness constraints: Mechanisms for fair classification. Proc. Artificial Intelligence Statist. (PMLR, New York), 962–970.Google Scholar
- (2024) Analyzing user engagement with Tiktok’s short format video recommendations using data donations. Proc. CHI Conf. Human Factors Comput. Systems (ACM, New York), 1–16.Google Scholar
- (2021) Can an AI algorithm mitigate racial economic inequality? An analysis in the context of airbnb. Marketing Sci. 40(5):813–820.Google Scholar
- (2023) Competing for recommendations: The strategic impact of personalized product recommendations in online marketplaces. Marketing Sci. 42(2):360–376.Link, Google Scholar

