Technology (Non)Emergence: How System Interdependencies Among Activities by Heterogeneous Actors Shaped Alternative Solar Technology Trajectories

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2022.17185

References

  • Abernathy WJ, Utterback JM (1978) Patterns of industry innovation. Tech. Rev. 80(7):41–47.Google Scholar
  • Adner R, Kapoor R (2010) Value creation in innovation ecosystems: How the structure of technological interdependence affects firm performance in new technology generations. Strategic Management J. 31(3):306–333.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Agarwal R, Bayus BL (2002) The market evolution and sales takeoff of product innovations. Management Sci. 48(8):1024–1041.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Agarwal R, Bayus BL, Tripsas M (2014) Abandoning innovation in emerging industries. Customer Needs Solutions 1:91–104.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Agarwal R, Guerra M, Moeen M, Aversa P (2025) Creating new industries: The generative role of heterogenous actors. Acad. Management Ann. 19(2):476–521.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Agarwal R, Helfat CE (2009) Strategic renewal of organizations. Organ. Sci. 20(2):281–293.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Agarwal R, Kim S, Moeen M (2021) Leveraging private enterprise: Incubation of new industries to address the public sector’s mission-oriented grand challenges. Strategy Sci. 6(4):385–411.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Agarwal R, Tripsas M (2008) Technology and industry evolution. Shane S, ed. The Handbook of Technology and Innovation Management (Wiley, Hoboken, NJ), 1–55.Google Scholar
  • Aldrich HE, Fiol CM (1994) Fools rush in? The institutional context of industry creation. Acad. Management Rev. 19(4):645–670.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Anderson P, Tushman ML (1990) Technological discontinuities and dominant designs: A cyclical model of technological change. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35:604–633.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Andersson J, Vico EP, Hammar L, Sandén BA (2017) The critical role of informed political direction for advancing technology: The case of Swedish marine energy. Energy Policy 101:52–64.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Andreasen KP, Sovacool BK (2015) Hydrogen technological innovation systems in practice: Comparing Danish and American approaches to fuel cell development. J. Clean Production 94:359–368.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Argyres NS, De Massis A, Foss NJ, Frattini F, Jones G, Silverman BS (2020) History‐informed strategy research: The promise of history and historical research methods in advancing strategy scholarship. Strategic Management J. 41(3):343–368.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Arthur B (1988) Competing technologies, increasing returns and lock-ins by historical events. Econom. J. 99:116–131.Google Scholar
  • Associated Press (2010) Energy experts focus on policy, technology. Associated Press Newswires (December 9), https://apnews.com.Google Scholar
  • Baldwin C, Hienerth C, Von Hippel E (2006) How user innovations become commercial products: A theoretical investigation and case study. Res. Policy 35(9):1291–1313.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bergek A (2019) Technological innovation systems: A review of recent findings and suggestions for future research. Boons F, McMeekin A, eds. Handbook of Sustainable Innovation (Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, UK), 200–218.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bergek A, Jacobsson S, Carlsson B, Lindmark S, Rickne A (2008) Analyzing the functional dynamics of technological innovation systems: A scheme of analysis. Res. Policy 37(3):407–429.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Binz C, Anadon LD (2018) Unrelated diversification in latecomer contexts—The emergence of the Chinese solar photovoltaics industry. Environ. Innovation Soc. Transit 28:14–34.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Binz C, Tang T, Huenteler J (2017) Spatial lifecycles of cleantech industries: The global development history of solar photovoltaics. Energy Policy 101:386–402.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Braguinsky S, Hounshell DA (2016) History and nanoeconomics in strategy and industry evolution research: Lessons from the Meiji‐Era Japanese cotton spinning industry. Strategic Management J. 37(1):45–65.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Business Wire (2006) Spire Corp–SPIR: Announces 100 megawatt turnkey solar module production line. (September 5), https://www.businesswire.com.Google Scholar
  • Business Wire (2007) Solaria secures solar cell supply agreement for 1.35 GW, announces $50M Series C round; long-term supply from Q-Cells positions Solaria for success. (July 23), https://www.businesswire.com.Google Scholar
  • Department of Energy (2015) Assuring solar modules will last for decades. (April 13), https://www.energy.gov.Google Scholar
  • Deutsche Bank (2007) Solar Photovoltaics Technology and Economics: Thin Films and Crystalline Silicon (Deutsche Bank, Frankfurt am Main, Germany), 1–48.Google Scholar
  • Dewald U, Truffer B (2011) Market formation in technological innovation systems: Diffusion of photovoltaic applications in Germany. Indust. Innovation 18(03):285–300.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dosi G (1982) Technological paradigms and technological trajectories: A suggested interpretation of the determinants and directions of technical change. Res. Policy 11(3):147–162.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dow Jones News Service (2008) Utilities still seek renewable energy despite tax credit uncertainty. (May 21), https://www.dowjones.com.Google Scholar
  • Eggers JP (2012) Falling flat: Failed technologies and investment under uncertainty. Admin. Sci. Quart. 57(1):47–80.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eggers JP (2014) Competing technologies and industry evolution: The benefits of making mistakes in the flat panel display industry. Strategic Management J. 35(2):159–178.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Energy Weekly News (2010) Energy policy; new research on energy policy from Duke University summarized. (July 23), https://www.energyweeknews.com.Google Scholar
  • Energy/Extra (2012) DOE hopes wary solar-energy investors will be encouraged by new test sites. (December 3), https://insideenergy.org.Google Scholar
  • Environment News Service (2000) Renewables and efficiency can ease energy squeeze. Environment News Service (October 4), https://www.ens-newswire.com.Google Scholar
  • Environment News Service (2001) New solar technologies emerge to meet electricity demand. Environment News Service (April 25), https://www.ens-newswire.com.Google Scholar
  • Ferrey S (2009) Restructuring a green grid: Legal challenges to accommodate new renewable energy infrastructure. Environ. Law 39(4):977–1014.Google Scholar
  • Forbes DP, Kirsch DA (2011) The study of emerging industries: Recognizing and responding to some central problems. J. Bus. Ventures 26(5):589–602.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Foreign Affairs (2017) Utility solar photovoltaic capacity is dominated by crystalline silicon panel technology. (December 13), https://www.foreignaffairs.com.Google Scholar
  • Furr N, Kapoor R (2018) Capabilities, technologies, and firm exit during industry shakeout: Evidence from the global solar photovoltaic industry. Strategic Management J. 39(1):33–61.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Furr NR, Snow DC (2015) Intergenerational hybrids: Spillbacks, spillforwards, and adapting to technology discontinuities. Organ. Sci. 26(2):475–493.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gao C, McDonald R (2022) Shaping nascent industries: Innovation strategy and regulatory uncertainty in personal genomics. Admin. Sci. Quart. 67(4):915–967.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Garud R, Karnoe P (2003) Bricolage versus breakthrough: Distributed and embedded agency in technology entrepreneurship. Res. Policy 32(2):277–300.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Garud R, Rappa M (1994) A socio-cognitive model of technology evolution: The case of cochlear implants. Organ. Sci. 5(3):344–362.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Garud R, Jain S, Kumaraswamy A (2002) Institutional entrepreneurship in the sponsorship of common technological standards: The case of Sun Microsystems and Java. Acad. Management J. 45(1):196–214.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Global Power Report (2007) Solar power heats up, fueled by incentives and the prospects of utility-scale projects. (November 1).Google Scholar
  • Golder PN, Tellis GJ (1997) Will it ever fly? Modeling the takeoff of really new consumer durables. Marketing Sci. 16(3):256–270.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gort M, Klepper S (1982) Time paths in the diffusion of product innovations. Econom. J. 92(367):630–653.Google Scholar
  • Greenstein S (2015) How the Internet Became Commercial: Innovation, Privatization, and the Birth of a New Network (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Grodal S, O’Mahony S (2017) How does a grand challenge become displaced? Explaining the duality of field mobilization. Acad. Management J. 60(5):1801–1827.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hannah DP, Eisenhardt KM (2018) How firms navigate cooperation and competition in nascent ecosystems. Strategic Management J. 39(12):3163–3192.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hekkert MP, Suurs RAA, Negro SO, Kuhlmann S, Smits R (2007) Functions of innovation systems: A new approach for analysing technological change. Tech. Forecasting Soc. Change 74(4):413–432.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Helfat CE, Campo-Rembado MA (2016) Integrative capabilities, vertical integration, and innovation over successive technology lifecycles. Organ. Sci. 27(2):249–264.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hiatt SR, Sine WD, Tolbert PS (2009) From Pabst to Pepsi: The deinstitutionalization of social practices and the creation of entrepreneurial opportunities. Admin. Sci. Quart. 54(4):635–667.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hipp A, Binz C (2020) Firm survival in complex value chains and global innovation systems: Evidence from solar photovoltaics. Res. Policy 49(1):103876.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hoppmann J (2021) Hand in hand to Nowhereland? How the resource dependence of research institutes influences their co-evolution with industry. Res. Policy 50(2):104–145.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hoppmann J, Anadon LD, Narayanamurti V (2020) Why matter matters: How technology characteristics shape the strategic framing of technologies. Res. Policy 49(1):103882.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hoppmann J, Huenteler J, Girod B (2014) Compulsive policy-making: The evolution of the German feed-in tariff for solar photovoltaic power. Res. Policy 43(8):1422–1441.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hoppmann J, Peters M, Schneider M, Hoffmann VH (2013) The two faces of market support: How deployment policies affect technological exploration and exploitation in the solar photovoltaic industry. Res. Policy 42(4):989–1003.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hugin PR (2009) Xunlight announces successful demonstration of wide-web roll-to-roll photovoltaic manufacturing process. (May 23), https://www.huginonline.com.Google Scholar
  • Huo ML, Zhang DW (2012) Lessons from photovoltaic policies in China for future development. Energy Policy 51:38–45.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jacobides MG, Winter SG (2005) The co‐evolution of capabilities and transaction costs: Explaining the institutional structure of production. Strategic Management J. 26(5):395–413.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jacobides MG, Cennamo C, Gawer A (2018) Towards a theory of ecosystems. Strategic Management J. 39:2244–2276.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jacobsson S, Sandén BA, Bångens L (2004) Transforming the energy system: The evolution of the German technological system for solar cells. Tech. Anal. Strategic Management 16(1):3–30.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jennings CE, Margolis RM, Bartlett J (2008) Historical analysis of investment in solar energy technologies. National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), NREL/TP-520-43602.Google Scholar
  • Jick TD (1979) Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: Triangulation in action. Admin. Sci. Quart. 24(4):602–611.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jones GG, Bouamane L (2012) “Power from Sunshine”: A business history of solar energy. Harvard Business School Working Paper No. 12-105, Harvard Business School, Boston.Google Scholar
  • Journal of Engineering (2016) Sandia Labs tapped again to lead national solar evaluation centers. (May 23), https://www.engineering.com.Google Scholar
  • Kamp L (2002) Learning in wind turbine development—A comparison between The Netherlands and Denmark. Thesis, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.Google Scholar
  • Kapoor R, Furr NR (2015) Complementarities and competition: Unpacking the drivers of entrants’ technology choices in the solar photovoltaic industry. Strategic Management J. 36(3):416–436.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kapoor R, Klueter T (2020) Progress and setbacks: The two faces of technology emergence. Res. Policy 49(1).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • King AA, Lenox MJ (2000) Industry self-regulation without sanctions: The chemical industry’s responsible care program. Acad. Management J. 43(4):698–716.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kirsch DA (1996) The electric car and the burden of history: Studies in automotive systems rivalry in America. Doctoral dissertation, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.Google Scholar
  • Kirsch DA, Mom GP (2002) Visions of transportation: The EVC and the transition from service-to product-based mobility. Bus. History Rev. 76(1):75–110.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Klepper S (1996) Entry, exit, growth, and innovation over the product life cycle. Amer. Econom. Rev. 86(3):562–583.Google Scholar
  • Klepper S (2015) Experimental Capitalism: The Nanoeconomics of American High-Tech Industries (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Knight FH (1921) Risk, Uncertainty and Profit (Hart, Schaffner, and Marx, New York).Google Scholar
  • Krabbe AD, Grodal S (2023) The aesthetic evolution of product categories. Admin. Sci. Quart. 68(3):734–780.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Langlois RN (2003) The vanishing hand: The changing dynamics of industrial capitalism. Industrial Corporate Change 12(2):351–385.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lee BH, Hiatt SR, Lounsbury M (2017) Market mediators and the trade-offs of legitimacy-seeking behaviors in a nascent category. Organ. Sci. 28(3):447–470.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lee BH, Struben J, Bingham CB (2018) Collective action and market formation: An integrative framework. Strategic Management J. 39(1):242–266.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lieberman MB, Montgomery DB (1988) First-mover advantages. Strategic Management J. 9(S1):41–58.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lipartito K (2014) Historical sources and data. Bucheli M, Wadhwani RD, eds. Organizations in Time: History, Theory, Methods (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 284–304.Google Scholar
  • Lippmann S, Aldrich HE (2014) History and evolutionary theory. Bucheli M, Wadhwani RD, eds. Organizations in Time: History, Theory, Methods (University Press, Oxford, UK), 192–216.Google Scholar
  • Lounsbury M, Ventresca M, Hirsch PM (2003) Social movements, field frames and industry emergence: A cultural–political perspective on US recycling. Socioeconom. Rev. 1(1):71–104.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Malerba (2002) Sectoral systems of innovation and production. Res. Policy 31:247–264.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Malerba F, Nelson R, Orsenigo L, Winter S (1999) History friendly models of industry evolution: The case of the computer industry. Industrial Corporate Change 8:3–40.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McGrath R, MacMillan I, Tushman M (1992) The role of executive team actions in shaping dominant designs: Towards the strategic shaping of technological progress. Strategic Management J. 13(52):137–161.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mitchell W (1991) Dual clocks: Entry order influences on incumbent and newcomer market share and survival when specialized assets retain their value. Strategic Management J. 12(2):85–100.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Moeen M, Agarwal R (2017) Incubation of an industry: Heterogenous knowledge bases and modes of value capture. Strategic Management J. 38:566–587.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Moeen M, Mitchell W (2020) How do pre‐entrants to the industry incubation stage choose between alliances and acquisitions for technical capabilities and specialized complementary assets? Strategic Management J. 41(8):1450–1489.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Moeen M, Agarwal R, Shah S (2020) Building industries by building knowledge: Uncertainty reduction over industry milestones. Strategy Sci. 5(3):218–244.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Mohliver A, Crilly D, Kaul A (2023) Corporate social counterpositioning: How attributes of social issues influence competitive response. Strategic Management J. 44(5):1199–1217.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mokyr J (1992) The Lever of Riches: Technological Creativity and Economic Progress (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Murmann JP (2003) Knowledge and Competitive Advantage: The Coevolution of Firms, Technology, and National Institutions (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nanosolar website (2004) Process technology. (August 3), https://web.archive.org/web/20040803075753/http://www.nanosolar.com/processtech.htm.Google Scholar
  • Negro SO, Hekkert MP, Smits RE (2007) Explaining the failure of the Dutch innovation system for biomass digestion—A functional analysis. Energy Policy 35(2):925–938.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Negro SO, Suurs RA, Hekkert MP (2008) The bumpy road of biomass gasification in the Netherlands: Explaining the rise and fall of an emerging innovation system. Tech. Forecasting Soc. Change 75(1):57–77.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nelson RR (1994) The co-evolution of technology, industrial structure, and supporting institutions. Industrial Corporate Change 3(1):47–63.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nelson RR, Rosenberg N (1993) Technical innovation and national systems. Nelson RR, ed. National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 3–22.Google Scholar
  • NUPAC (2017) Charging up: The renewable energy market. (February 1).Google Scholar
  • Ozcan P, Gurses K (2018) Playing cat and mouse: Contests over regulatory categorization of dietary supplements in the United States. Acad. Management J. 61(5):1789–1820.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ozcan P, Santos FM (2015) The market that never was: Turf wars and failed alliances in mobile payments. Strategic Management J. 36(10):1486–1512.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Peplow M (2014) Thin-film solar cells freed from toxic processing. IEEE Spectrum. (June 25), https://spectrum.ieee.org.Google Scholar
  • Pickerel K (2016) CIGS thin film: Solar’s black sheep is finding its feet. Solar Power World (January 4), https://www.solarpowerworldonline.com.Google Scholar
  • Pillai S, Goldfarb B, Kirsch D, Kim S, Starr E (2024) From hypothesis testing towards inference to best explanation: A PEEBI testimonial structure for abductive studies in strategy. Preprint, submitted February 11, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5073982.Google Scholar
  • Platts Energy Trader (2017) Solar PV installations in Q1 totaled 2,044 MW. (June 9), https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/us-solar-market-adds-2-gigawatts-of-pv-in-q1-2017-300470723.html?utm_source=chatgpt.com.Google Scholar
  • Power Market Today (2010a) Major renewable question: Solar PV technology’s future? (March 30), https://www.powermarkettoday.com.Google Scholar
  • Power Market Today (2010b) Thin-film solar PV technology faces reality check. (May 3), https://www.powermarkettoday.com.Google Scholar
  • PR Newswire (2009) XsunX and Intevac team up to develop breakthrough thin-film photovoltaic manufacturing technology; XsunX and Intevac to leverage cross-industry expertise to improve thin film solar cells. (September 21).Google Scholar
  • PR Newswire (2015) DTE Energy begins construction on solar array in Romulus. (August 3), https://www.prnewswire.com.Google Scholar
  • Proctor C (2015) Xcel wants to test battery storage for solar power in Denver area. Bizjournals (October 30), https://www.bizjournals.com.Google Scholar
  • Quitzow R (2015) Dynamics of a policy-driven market: The co-evolution of technological innovation systems for solar photovoltaics in China and Germany. Environment. Innovation Soc. Transit 17:126–148.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Recharge (2012) Some rays of light amid the gloom for thin-film. (May 18), https://www.rechargenews.com.Google Scholar
  • Reuters News (2008) New solar CIGS cells creep up on silicon (April 2), https://www.reuters.com/article/business/environment/new-solar-cigs-cells-creep-up-on-silicon-idUSN02297477/.Google Scholar
  • Richardson GP (1991) Feedback Thought in Social Science and Systems Theory (University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia).Google Scholar
  • Romer PM (1990) Endogenous technological change. J. Political Econom. 98(5, Part 2):S71–S102.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rosenberg N (1982) Inside the Black Box: Technology and Economics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar
  • Rosenberg N, Birdzell LE Jr (1986) How the West Grew Rich: The Economic Transformation of the Industrial World (Basic Books, New York).Google Scholar
  • Rosenkopf L, Tushman ML (1998) The coevolution of community networks and technology: Lessons from the flight simulation industry. Industrial Corporate Change 7(2):311–346.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rothaermel FT, Hill CWL (2005) Technological discontinuities and complementary assets: A longitudinal study of industry and firm performance. Organ. Sci. 16(1):52–70.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Sanderson SW, Simons KL (2014) Light emitting diodes and the lighting revolution: The emergence of a solid-state lighting industry. Res. Policy 43(10):1730–1746.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schilling MA (2023) Strategic Management of Technological Innovation (McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
  • Shadish WR, Cook TD, Campbell DT (2002) Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference (Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston).Google Scholar
  • Sine WD, Lee BH (2009) Tilting at windmills? The environmental movement and the emergence of the U.S. wind energy sector. Admin. Sci. Quart. 54(1):123–155.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • SKRIN Newswire (2012) Hevel Solar partners with Oerlikon Solar to open first thin film research and development center in Russia. (February 22).Google Scholar
  • SNL Power Daily Market Report (2014) Xcel Energy CEO reiterates that utility-scale is the ‘right way’ to add solar. (May 2), https://www.spglobal.com.Google Scholar
  • SNL Power Daily with Market Report (2017) Solar PV installations in Q1 totaled 2,044 MW. (June 9), https://www.spglobal.com.Google Scholar
  • Société Générale (2008) Renewable energy: Silicon and solar PV: Still lots of questions and very few answers! Société Générale, Paris, 1.Google Scholar
  • Solar Energy Industries Association (SEIA) (2014) U.S. Solar Market Insight Report 2014 Year in Review (Solar Energy Industries Association, Washington, DC), 1–5.Google Scholar
  • State Legislatures (2011) Rise and shine: the clouds of high costs haven’t darkened the solar promise. (December 1), https://www.ncsl.org.Google Scholar
  • Sterman JD (2000) Business Dynamics: Systems Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World (McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
  • Struben J, Lee BH, Bingham CB (2020) Collective action problems and resource allocation during market formation. Strategy Sci. 5(3):245–270.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Suarez F (2004) Battles for technological dominance: An integrative framework. Res. Policy 33(2):271–286.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Suarez F, Lanzolla G (2007) The role of environmental dynamics in building a first mover advantage theory. Acad. Management Rev. 32(2):377–392.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Suurs RAA, Hekkert MP (2009) Cumulative causation in the formation of a technological innovation system: The case of biofuels in the Netherlands. Tech. Forecasting Soc. Change 76(8):1003–1020.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Szerb A, Furr N (2025) The emergence and evolution of innovation ecosystems: Evidence from the solar PV ecosystem. Strategic Management J. 46(10):2605–2657.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Teece DJ (1986) Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Res. Policy 15(6):285–305.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • The Boston Globe (2016) Don’t get burned by solar roof shingles. (July 29), https://www.bostonglobe.com.Google Scholar
  • The New York Times (1988) Advances propel solar energy into market. The New York Times (September 13), https://www.nytimes.com/1988/09/13/science/advances-propel-solar-energy-into-market.html.Google Scholar
  • U.S. Fed News (2006) New York Power Authority chief cites need for clean energy sources. (November 7), https://www.usfednews.com.Google Scholar
  • U.S. Federal News (2005) Suffolk County executive, environmentalists push to approve sales tax exemption for solar energy systems. (August 22), https://www.usfednews.com.Google Scholar
  • Utterback JM, Abernathy WJ (1975) A dynamic model of process and product innovation. Omega (Westport) 3(6):639–656.Google Scholar
  • Vasseur V, Kemp R (2011) The role of policy in the evolution of technological innovation systems for photovoltaic power in Germany and the Netherlands. Internat. J. Tech., Policy Management 11(3):307–327.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Watanabe C, Wakabayashi K, Miyazawa T (2000) Industrial dynamism and the creation of a “virtuous cycle” between R&D, market growth and price reduction: The case of photovoltaic power generation (PV) development in Japan. Technovation 20(6):299–312.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wormald A (2026) Money matters: Regulatory uncertainty and emergence of the African mobile money industry. Working paper, University of North-Carolina Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill.Google Scholar
  • Wormald A, Agarwal R, Braguinsky S, Shah SK (2021) David overshadows Goliath: Specializing in generality for internationalization in the global mobile money industry. Strategic Management J. 42(8):1459–1489.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • York JG, Lenox MJ (2014) Exploring the sociocultural determinants of de novo versus de alio entry in emerging industries. Strategic Management J. 35(13):1930–1951.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zobel A, Hoppmann J, Núñez Jiménez A (2017) Open innovation in nascent ecosystems: The influence of system bottlenecks on firms’ patterns of collaboration. Working paper.Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.