Outshining Your Rival: Interpersonal Rivalry and Its Effects on Organizational Contributions

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2024.18649

References

  • Alchian AA, Demsetz H (1972) Production, information costs, and economic organization. Amer. Econom. Rev. 62(5):777–795.Google Scholar
  • Amihud Y, Lev B (1981) Risk reduction as a managerial motive for conglomerate mergers. Bell J. Econom. 12(2):605–617.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Angrist JD, Pischke JS (2009) Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist’s Companion (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Arcidiacono P, Kinsler J, Price J (2017) Productivity spillovers in team production: Evidence from professional basketball. J. Labor Econom. 35(1):191–225.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Babcock L, Recalde MP, Vesterlund L, Weingart L (2017) Gender differences in accepting and receiving requests for tasks with low promotability. Amer. Econom. Rev. 107(3):714–747.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bar-Eli M, Azar OH, Ritov I, Keidar-Levin Y, Schein G (2007) Action bias among elite soccer goalkeepers: The case of penalty kicks. J. Econom. Psych. 28(5):606–621.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bettis RA (2012) The search for asterisks: Compromised statistical tests and flawed theories. Strategic Management J. 33(1):108–113.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bidwell M, Won S, Barbulescu R, Mollick E (2015) I used to work at Goldman Sachs! How firms benefit from organizational status in the market for human capital. Strategic Management J. 36(8):1164–1173.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Call ML, Nyberg AJ, Thatcher S (2015) Stargazing: An integrative conceptual review, theoretical reconciliation, and extension for star employee research. J. Appl. Psych. 100(3):623–640.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Campbell EM, Liao H, Chuang A, Zhou J, Dong Y (2017) Hot shots and cool reception? An expanded view of social consequences for high performers. J. Appl. Psych. 102(5):845–866.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cohen J (2016) Ranking 70 greatest player rivalries in NBA history. Accessed January 17, 2024, https://www.nba.com/magic/gallery/cohen-8ball-ranking-70-greatest-player-rivalries-nba-history/.Google Scholar
  • Converse BA, Reinhard DA (2016) On rivalry and goal pursuit: Shared competitive history, legacy concerns, and strategy selection. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 110(2):191–213.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Duckworth AL, Peterson C, Matthews MD, Kelly DR (2007) Grit: Perseverance and passion for long-term goals. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 92(6):1087–1101.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Durand R, Piezunka H, Reineke P (2025) Difference in deference: When competitors do not give in despite having lost. Organ. Sci. 36(2):940–966. LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Dweck CS, Leggett EL (1988) A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psych. Rev. 95(2):256–273.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eisenhardt KM (1989) Agency theory: An assessment and review. Acad. Management Rev. 14(1):57–74.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eriksen KW, Kvaløy O (2017) No guts, no glory: An experiment on excessive risk-taking. Rev. Finance 21(3):1327–1351.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ertug G, Castellucci F (2013) Getting what you need: How reputation and status affect team performance, hiring, and salaries in the NBA. Acad. Management J. 56(2):407–431.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ertug G, Maoret M (2020) Do coaches in the National Basketball Association actually display racial bias? A replication and extension. Acad. Management Discoveries 6(2):206–234.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ethiraj SK, Levinthal D (2009) Hoping for A to Z while rewarding only A: Complex organizations and multiple goals. Organ. Sci. 20(1):4–21.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Festinger L (1954) A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations 7(2):117–140.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fonti F, Maoret M (2016) The direct and indirect effects of core and peripheral social capital on organizational performance. Strategic Management J. 37(8):1765–1786.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Garcia SM, Tor A, Schiff TM (2013) The psychology of competition: A social comparison perspective. Perspect. Psych. Sci. 8(6):634–650.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Goldfarb B, King AA (2016) Scientific apophenia in strategic management research: Significance tests and mistaken inference. Strategic Management J. 37(1):167–176.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gouldner AW (1960) The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 25(2):161–178.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Grohsjean T, Kober P, Zucchini L (2016) Coming back to Edmonton: Competing with former employers and colleagues. Acad. Management J. 59(2):394–413.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Grohsjean T, Piezunka H, Mickeler M (2025) When colleagues compete outside the firm. Strategic Management J. 46(3):640–666. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Groysberg B, Polzer JT, Elfenbein HA (2011) Too many cooks spoil the broth: How high-status individuals decrease group effectiveness. Organ. Sci. 22(3):722–737.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Grund C, Höcker J, Zimmermann S (2013) Incidence and consequences of risk‐taking behavior in tournaments—Evidence from the NBA. Econom. Inquiry 51(2):1489–1501. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hallila P, Frankort HTW, Aversa P (2024) Revving up or backing down? Cross-level effects of firm-level tournaments on employees’ competitive actions. Acad. Management J. 67(5):1331–1358.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Harville DA, Smith MH (1994) The home-court advantage: How large is it, and does it vary from team to team? Amer. Statistician 48(1):22–28.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hayward ML, Hambrick DC (1997) Explaining the premiums paid for large acquisitions: Evidence of CEO hubris. Admin. Sci. Quart. 42(1):103–127.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hoisl K, Gruber M, Conti A (2017) R&D team diversity and performance in hypercompetitive environments. Strategic Management J. 38(7):1455–1477.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Holmstrom B (1979) Moral hazard and observability. Bell J. Econom. 10(1):74–91.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Holmstrom B, Milgrom P (1991) Multitask principal-agent analyses: Incentive contracts, asset ownership, and job design. J. Law Econom. Organ. 7(Special issue):24–52. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Huckman RS, Staats BR, Upton DM (2009) Team familiarity, role experience, and performance: Evidence from Indian software services. Management Sci. 55(1):85–100.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ibarra H, Kilduff M, Tsai W (2005) Zooming in and out: Connecting individuals and collectivities at the frontiers of organizational network research. Organ. Sci. 16(4):359–371.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Jones GR (1984) Task visibility, free riding, and shirking: Explaining the effect of structure and technology on employee behavior. Acad. Management Rev. 9(4):684–695.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kacperczyk A, Beckman CM, Moliterno TP (2015) Disentangling risk and change: Internal and external social comparison in the mutual fund industry. Admin. Sci. Quart. 60(2):228–262.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Karau SJ, Williams KD (1993) Social loafing: A meta-analytic review and theoretical integration. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 65(4):681–706.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kehoe RR, Tzabbar D (2015) Lighting the way or stealing the shine? An examination of the duality in star scientists’ effects on firm innovative performance. Strategic Management J. 36(5):709–727.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kerr S (1975) On the folly of rewarding A, while hoping for B. Acad. Management J. 18(4):769–783.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kilduff GJ (2014) Driven to win: Rivalry, motivation, and performance. Soc. Psych. Personality Sci. 5(8):944–952.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kilduff GJ (2019) Interfirm relational rivalry: Implications for competitive strategy. Acad. Management Rev. 44(4):775–799.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kilduff GJ, Galinsky AD (2017) The spark that ignites: Mere exposure to rivals increases Machiavellianism and unethical behavior. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 69(March):156–162.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kilduff GJ, Elfenbein HA, Staw BM (2010) The psychology of rivalry: A relationally dependent analysis of competition. Acad. Management J. 53(5):943–969.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kilduff GJ, Galinsky A, Gallo E, Reade J (2016) Whatever it takes to win: Rivalry increases unethical behavior. Acad. Management J. 59(5):1508–1534.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lampronti SY, Operti E, Sgourev SV (2025) Rivalry as a contextual factor of gender inequality in network returns. J. Management Stud. 62(4):1599–1643.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Latham GP, Pinder CC (2005) Work motivation theory and research at the dawn of the twenty-first century. Organ. Behav. Human Performance 97(2–3):328–352.Google Scholar
  • Levine JM, Thompson L (1996) Conflict in groups. Higgins ET, Kruglanski AW, eds. Social Psychology: Handbook of Basic Principles (Guilford, New York), 745–776.Google Scholar
  • Li J, Tang YI (2010) CEO hubris and firm risk taking in China: The moderating role of managerial discretion. Acad. Management J. 53(1):45–68.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Locke EA, Latham GP (2002) Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: A 35‐year odyssey. Amer. Psychologist 57(9):705–717.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lount RB, Phillips KW (2007) Working harder with the out-group: The impact of social category diversity on motivation gains. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 103(2):214–224.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Malmendier U, Tate G (2009) Superstar CEOs. Quart. J. Econom. 124(4):1593–1638.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Menon T, Thompson L, Choi HS (2006) Tainted knowledge vs. tempting knowledge: People avoid knowledge from internal rivals and seek knowledge from external rivals. Management Sci. 52(8):1129–1144.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Milstein N, Striet Y, Lavidor M, Anaki D, Gordon I (2022) Rivalry and performance: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Organ. Psych. Rev. 12(3):332–361.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nickerson JA, Zenger TR (2008) Envy, comparison costs, and the economic theory of the firm. Strategic Management J. 29(13):1429–1449.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Niederle M, Vesterlund L (2011) Gender and competition. Annual Rev. Econom. 3(1):601–630.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Oettl A (2012) Reconceptualizing stars: Scientist helpfulness and peer performance. Management Sci. 58(6):1122–1140.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Operti E, Lampronti SY, Sgourev SV (2020) Hold your horses: Multiplexity, mobility and conflict in the Palio di Siena (1743–2010). Organ. Sci. 31(1):85–102.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Operti E, Sgourev SV, Lampronti SY (2021) Choose your enemies well: Mapping, managing, and leveraging rivalry. California Management Rev. 64(1):29–46.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Piezunka H, Lee W, Haynes R, Bothner M (2018) The escalation of competition into conflict in competitive networks of Formula One drivers. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 115(15):E3361–E3367. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pike BE, Kilduff GJ, Galinsky AD (2018) The long shadow of rivalry: Rivalry motivates performance today and tomorrow. Psych. Sci. 29(5):804–813.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Price J, Soebbing BP, Berri D, Humphreys BR (2010) Tournament incentives, league policy, and NBA team performance revisited. J. Sports Econom. 11(2):117–135.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Repenning NP, Sterman JD (2001) Nobody ever gets credit for fixing problems that never happened: Creating and sustaining process improvement. California Management Rev. 43(4):64–88.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rotundo M, Sackett PR (2002) The relative importance of task, citizenship, and counterproductive performance to global ratings of job performance: A policy-capturing approach. J. Appl. Psych. 87(1):66–80.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sgourev SV, Operti E (2019) From Montagues to Capulets: Analyzing the systemic nature of rivalry in career mobility. Acad. Management J. 62(5):1333–1357.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shapiro SP (2005) Agency theory. Annual Rev. Sociol. 31(1):263–284.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sharapov D, Ross JM (2023) Whom should a leader imitate? Using rivalry‐based imitation to manage strategic risk in changing environments. Strategic Management J. 44(1):311–342.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Simmons R, Berri DJ (2011) Mixing the princes and the paupers: Pay and performance in the National Basketball Association. Labour Econom. 18(3):381–388.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Simms A, Nichols T (2014) Social loafing: A review of the literature. J. Management Policy Practice 15(1):58–67.Google Scholar
  • Simonsohn U, Simmons JP, Nelson LD (2015) Specification curve: Descriptive and inferential statistics on all reasonable specifications. Preprint, submitted November 25, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2694998.Google Scholar
  • Stewart GL, Barrick MR (2000) Team structure and performance: Assessing the mediating role of intrateam process and the moderating role of task type. Acad. Management J. 43(2):135–148.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stuart HC (2017) Structural disruption, relational experimentation, and performance in professional hockey teams: A network perspective on member change. Organ. Sci. 28(2):283–300.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Stuart HC, Moore C (2017) Shady characters: The implications of illicit organizational roles for resilient team performance. Acad. Management J. 60(5):1963–1985.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tarakci M, Ateş NY, Floyd SW, Ahn Y, Wooldridge B (2018) Performance feedback and middle managers’ divergent strategic behavior: The roles of social comparisons and organizational identification. Strategic Management J. 39(4):1139–1162.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • To C, Kilduff GJ, Rosikiewicz B (2020) When interpersonal competition helps and when it harms: An integration via challenge and threat. Acad. Management Ann. 14(2):908–934.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • To C, Yan TT, Sherf EN (2022) Victorious and hierarchical: Past performance as a determinant of team hierarchical differentiation. Organ. Sci. 33(6):2346–2363.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • To C, Kilduff GJ, Ordoñez L, Schweitzer ME (2018) Going for it on fourth down: Rivalry increases risk-taking, physiological arousal, and promotion focus. Acad. Management J. 61(4):1281–1306. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Uribe J, Carnahan S, Meluso J, Austin‐Breneman J (2022) How do managers evaluate individual contributions to team production? A theory and empirical test. Strategic Management J. 43(12):2577–2601.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Van Dyne L, LePine JA (1998) Helping and voice extra‐role behaviors: Evidence of construct and predictive validity. J. Appl. Psych. 83(3):354–367.Google Scholar
  • Wade JB, Porac JF, Pollock TG, Graffin SD (2006) The burden of celebrity: The impact of CEO certification contests on CEO pay and performance. Acad. Management J. 49(4):643–660.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wageman R (1995) Interdependence and group effectiveness. Admin. Sci. Quart. 40(1):145–180.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wang L (2009) Money and fame: Vividness effects in the National Basketball Association. J. Behav. Decision Making 22(1):20–44.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • White MH, Sheldon KM (2014) The contract year syndrome in the NBA and MLB: A classic undermining pattern. Motivation Emotion 38(2):196–205.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Willer R (2009) Groups reward individual sacrifice: The status solution to the collective action problem. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 74(1):23–43.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yip JA, Schweitzer ME, Nurmohamed S (2018) Trash-talking: Competitive incivility motivates rivalry, performance, and unethical behavior. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 144 (January):125–144.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zucker LG, Darby MR, Armstrong JS (2002) Commercializing knowledge: University science, knowledge capture, and firm performance in biotechnology. Management Sci. 48(1):138–153.LinkGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.