Criminal Deception in Silicon Valley

References

• Abrahamson E, Beaumard P (2008) What lies behind organizational facades and how organizational facades lie: An untold story of organizational decision making. Hodgkinson G, Starbuck W, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Organizational Decision Making (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 437–452.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bathini DR, Parth S, Kandathil G (2026) The legitimacy lie as dark institutional work: Rhetoric and reality in India’s platform economy. J. Management Inquiry, ePub ahead of print March 10, https://doi.org/10.1177/10564926261427991.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boudette NE, Ewing J (2020) Head of Nikola, a G.M. electric truck partner, quits amid fraud claims. New York Times (September 21), https://www.nytimes.com/2020/09/21/business/nikola-trevor-milton-resigns.html.Google Scholar
• Bromley P, Meyer JW, Jia R (2022) Entrepreneurship as cultural theme in neoliberal society. Eberhart R, Lounsbury M, Aldrich H, eds. Research in the Sociology of Organizations: Entrepreneurialism and Society: New Theoretical Perspectives, vol. 85 (Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Leeds, UK), 55–75.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bureau S, Gerges-Yammine R, Battaglia D, Zhou J (2026) Legitimising destructive entrepreneurship: The case of a crypto-entrepreneur. Small Bus. Econom. 66(2):633–646.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Byers T (2020) Entrepreneurship and ethics. https://ecorner.stanford.edu/articles/entrepreneurship-and-ethics/.Google Scholar
• Caliskan K, Lounsbury M (2022) Entrepreneurialism as discourse: Toward a critical research agenda. Eberhart R, Lounsbury M, Aldrich H, eds. Research in the Sociology of Organizations: Entrepreneurialism and Society, New Theoretical Perspectives, vol. 81 (Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Leeds, UK), 43–53.Google Scholar
• Canales R, Regele MD, Groberg MG, Eftekhari N (2025) Falling off the unicorn: The maintenance of unrealistic startup labor narratives. Acad. Management J. 68(4):760–786.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carlson M (2023) (Private) market mania: Assessing the impact of private market booms on venture capital-backed startup governance. Hastings Bus. Law J. 19(2):199–220.Google Scholar
• Chapple D, Pollock N, D’Adderio L (2022) From pitching to briefing: Extending entrepreneurial storytelling to new audiences. Organ. Stud. 43(5):773–795.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Charmaz K (2011) Constructing Grounded Theory (Sage Publications, London).Google Scholar
• Costas J, Grey C (2014) Bringing secrecy into the open: Towards a theorization of the social processes of organizational secrecy. Organ. Stud. 35(10):1423–1447.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coviello N, Autio E, Nambisan S, Patzelt H, Thomas LDW (2024) Organizational scaling, scalability, and scale-up: Definitional harmonization and a research agenda. J. Bus. Ventures 39(5):106419.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davis F (1959) The cabdriver and his fare: Facets of a fleeting relationship. Amer. J. Sociol. 65(2):158–165. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davis GF (2016) The Vanishing American Corporation: Navigating the Hazards of a New Economy (Berrett-Koehler Publishers, Oakland, CA).Google Scholar
• Delmestri G, Greenwood R (2016) How Cinderella became a queen: Theorizing radical status change. Admin. Sci. Quart. 61(4):507–550.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DeSantola A, Gulati R (2017) Scaling: Organizing and growth in entrepreneurial ventures. Acad. Management Ann. 11(2):640–668.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eaglin FC (2026) The need for speed: The impact of capital constraints on strategic misconduct. Management Sci. 72(2):1680–1698.Link, Google Scholar
• Eberhart RN, Barley S, Nelson A (2022a) Freedom is just another word for nothing left to lose: Entrepreneurialism and the changing nature of employment relations. Eberhart R, Lounsbury M, Aldrich H, eds. Entrepreneurialism and Society: New Theoretical Perspectives (Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Leeds, UK), 13–41.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eberhart R, Lounsbury M, Aldrich H, eds. (2022b) Entrepreneurialism and Society: New Theoretical Perspectives (Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Leeds, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Essers C, Dey P, Tedmanson D, Verduyn K, eds. (2017) Critical Perspectives on Entrepreneurship: Challenging Dominant Discourses (Routledge, London).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fosdick RB (1915) Modus operandi system in the detection of criminals. J. Amer. Institute Criminal Law Criminology 6:560.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gabbioneta C, Clemente M, Greenwood R, eds. (2023) Organizational Wrongdoing as the “Foundational” Grand Challenge: Consequences and Impact (Emerald Publishing Limited, Leeds, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gabbioneta C, Greenwood R, Mazzola P, Minoja M (2013) The influence of the institutional context on corporate illegality. Accounting, Organ. Soc. 38(6):484–504.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gagliardi L, Sorenson O (2026) Entrepreneurship and gentrification. Organ. Sci. 37(1):1–16. Link, Google Scholar
• Gamez-Djokic M, Kouchaki M, Waytz A (2022) Virtuous startups: The credentialing power of the startup label. Acad. Management Discoveries 8(3):441–458.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Garud R, Schildt HA, Lant TK (2014) Entrepreneurial storytelling, future expectations, and the paradox of legitimacy. Organ. Sci. 25(5):1479–1492.Link, Google Scholar
• Garud R, Snihur Y, Thomas LDW, Phillips N (2025) The dark side of entrepreneurial framing: A process model of deception and legitimacy loss. Acad. Management Rev. 50(2):299–317. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gehman J, Wry T (2022) Cultural entrepreneurship: Theorizing the dark sides. Lockwood C, Soublière JF, eds. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, Advances in Cultural Entrepreneurship, vol. 80 (Emerald Publishing Limited, Leeds, UK), 97–110.Google Scholar
• Gil E (2018) High Growth Handbook: Scaling Startups from 10 to 10,000 People (Stripe Press, San Francisco).Google Scholar
• Goffman E (1959) The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life (Anchor Books, New York).Google Scholar
• Greve HR, Palmer D, Pozner J (2010) Organizations gone wild: The causes, processes, and consequences of organizational misconduct. Acad. Management Ann. 4(1):53–107.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hampel CE, Dalpiaz E (2025) When hype collides with morality: How entrepreneurial framing affects the behavior and legitimacy of hyped ventures. J. Bus. Ventures 40(4):106506.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hampel CE, Tracey P, Weber K (2020) The art of the pivot: How new ventures manage identification relationships with stakeholders as they change direction. Acad. Management J. 63(2):440–471.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoffman R (2018) (1) Theranos: Blitzscaling, blitzfailing, or blitzfrauding? Retrieved July 22, 2025, https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/theranos-blitzscaling-blitzfailing-blitzfrauding-reid-hoffman/.Google Scholar
• Hoffman R, Yeh C (2018) Blitzscaling: The Lightning-Fast Path to Building Massively Valuable Companies (Currency, New York).Google Scholar
• Hoffman R, Cohen J, Triff D (2021) Masters of Scale: Surprising Truths from the World’s Most Successful Entrepreneurs (Bantam Press, London).Google Scholar
• Jansen JJP, Heavey C, Mom TJM, Simsek Z, Zahra SA (2023) Scaling-up: Building, leading and sustaining rapid growth over time. J. Management Stud. 60(3):581–604.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jones C, Spicer A (2005) The sublime object of entrepreneurship. Organization 12(2):223–246.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jones C, Spicer A (2009) Unmasking the Entrepreneur (Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Karp R, O’Mahony S (2025) Confronting the limits of symbolic actions: How entrepreneurs narrow the presentation-performance gap. Organ. Sci. 36(5):1643–1675.Link, Google Scholar
• Kaynak E, Rahman HA (2024) “It takes more than a pill to kill”: Bounded accountability in disciplining professional misconduct despite heightened transparency. Organ. Sci. 35(6):2064–2094.Link, Google Scholar
• Kim S, Kim A (2022) Going viral or growing like an oak tree? Towards sustainable local development through entrepreneurship. Acad. Management J. 65(5):1709–1746.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Knight E, Grimes MG, Gehman J (2025) The limits of pivoting: A culturally informed model of resource commitments during repeated organizational transformation. Acad. Management J. 68(5):1130–1162.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kwon D, Sorenson O (2023) The Silicon Valley syndrome. Entrepreneurship Theory Practice 47(2):344–368.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lehman DW, O’Connor K, Kovács B, Newman GE (2019) Authenticity. Acad. Management Ann. 13(1):1–42.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levinson D (2002) Modus operandi. Encyclopedia of Crime and Punishment (SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA), 1071–1072.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lockwood C, Soublière JF, eds. (2022) Research in the Sociology of Organizations: Advances in Cultural Entrepreneurship (Emerald Group Publishing, Leeds, UK).Google Scholar
• Lodge J, Augustine G, Radic M (2025) From paralysis to publicization: How victims of the UK post office horizon it scandal experienced and confronted organizational harm. Acad. Management J. 69(2).Google Scholar
• Logue D, Grimes M (2022) Living up to the hype: How new ventures manage the resource and liability of future-oriented visions within the nascent market of impact investing. Acad. Management J. 65(3):1055–1082.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lounsbury M, Glynn MA (2001) Cultural entrepreneurship: Stories, legitimacy, and the acquisition of resources. Strategic Management J. 22(6–7):545–564.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lounsbury M, Glynn MA (2019) Cultural Entrepreneurship: A New Agenda for the Study of Entrepreneurial Processes and Possibilities. Phillips N, Greenwood R, eds. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lubinski C, Tucker HK (2025) Entrepreneurialism: Conceptual exploration of an ideology. Entrepreneurship Regional Development 38(1–2):1–17. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Martens ML, Jennings JE, Jennings PD (2007) Do the stories they tell get them the money they need? The role of entrepreneurial narratives in resource acquisition. Acad. Management J. 50(5):1107–1132.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Massa FG, Helms WS, Voronov M, Wang L (2017) Emotions uncorked: Inspiring evangelism for the emerging practice of cool-climate winemaking in Ontario. Acad. Management J. 60(2):461–499.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McDonald R, Gao C (2019) Pivoting isn’t enough? Managing strategic reorientation in new ventures. Organ. Sci. 30(6):1289–1318.Link, Google Scholar
• McMullen JS (2025) “Fake it ‘til you make it”: The power and peril of implied social validation in the entrepreneurial journey. Acad. Management Perspect., ePub ahead of print May 22, https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2023.0513.Google Scholar
• Merriam-Webster (2025) Definition of FACADE. Retrieved July 21, 2025, https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/facade.Google Scholar
• Mohliver A (2019) How misconduct spreads: Auditors’ role in the diffusion of stock-option backdating. Admin. Sci. Quart. 64(2):310–336.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mohliver A, Karp R, Zuzul T (2022) Dominant deceptions: Explaining the tenacity of deceit in entrepreneurial ventures. Preprint, September 29, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4286604.Google Scholar
• Nystrom PC, Starbuck WH (1984) Organizational facades. Acad. Management Ann. Meeting Proc. 1984(1):182–185.Google Scholar
• Palmer D (2013) Normal Organizational Wrongdoing: A Critical Analysis of Theories of Misconduct in and by Organizations (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
• Palmer D, Weiss T (2022) The unique vulnerabilities of entrepreneurial ventures to misconduct. Eberhart R, Lounsbury M, Aldrich H, eds. Research in the Sociology of Organizations: Entrepreneurialism and Society, vol. 81 (Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Leeds, UK),129–159.Google Scholar
• Palmer D, Smith-Crowe K, Greenwood R, eds. (2016) Organizational Wrongdoing: Key Perspectives and New Directions (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Piazza A, Reese D, Chung SH (2023) Venturing through the doors of perception. Acad. Management Discoveries 9(1):1–16.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Platt AI (2022) Legal guardrails for a unicorn crackdown. Michigan Law Rev. 120:89–112.Google Scholar
• Platt AI (2023) (More) legal guardrails for a unicorn crackdown. NYU Law Rev. 98:359.Google Scholar
• Pollman E (2020) Private company lies. Georgetown Law J. 109:353.Google Scholar
• Pollman E (2022a) Adventure capital. Southern California Law Rev. 96:1341–1370.Google Scholar
• Pollman E (2022b) The rise of regulatory affairs in innovative startups. Smith DG, Broughman B, Hurt C, eds. The Cambridge Handbook of Law and Entrepreneurship in the United States (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 27–48.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Scheaf DJ, Wood MS (2022) Entrepreneurial fraud: A multidisciplinary review and synthesized framework. Entrepreneurship Theory Practice 46(3):607–642. Crossref, Google Scholar
• SEC (2021) Nikola Corporation to pay $125 million to resolve fraud charges. Retrieved August 22, 2025, https://www.sec.gov/newsroom/press-releases/2021-267.Google Scholar
• SEC (2023) SEC charges founder of Frank with fraud in connection with $175 million sale of student loan assistance company. Retrieved August 22, 2025, https://www.sec.gov/newsroom/press-releases/2023-74.Google Scholar
• Shepherd DA (2019) Researching the dark side, downside, and destructive side of entrepreneurship: It is the compassionate thing to do! Acad. Management Discoveries 5(3):217–220.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Suchman MC (2000) Dealmakers and counselors: Law firms as intermediaries in the development of Silicon Valley. Understanding Silicon Valley (Stanford University Press, Palo Alto, CA), 27–97.Google Scholar
• Swidler A (1986) Culture in action: Symbols and strategies. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 51(2):273–286.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Taeuscher K, Zhao EY, Lounsbury M (2022) Categories and narratives as sources of distinctiveness: Cultural entrepreneurship within and across categories. Strategic Management J. 43(10):2101–2134.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Überbacher F (2014) Legitimation of new ventures: A review and research programme. J. Management Stud. 51(4):667–698.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vogel SK (2022) Neoliberal ideology and the myth of the self-made entrepreneur. Eberhart R, Lounsbury M, Aldrich H, eds. Research in the Sociology of Organizations: Entrepreneurialism and Society, vol. 81 (Emerald Publishing Limited, Leeds, UK), 77–99.Google Scholar
• Wadhwani RD, Lubinski C (2025) Hype: Marker and maker of entrepreneurial culture. J. Bus. Ventures 40(2):106455.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Stuart T, Li J (2021) Fraud and innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. 66(2):267–297.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wansley M, Weinstein S (2023) Venture predation. J. Corporation Law 48(4):813–869.Google Scholar
• Weiss T, Eberhart R, Lounsbury M, Nelson A, Rindova V, Meyer J, Bromley P, et al. (2023) The social effects of entrepreneurship on society and some potential remedies: Four provocations. J. Management Inquiry 32(4):251–277.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wood MS, Scheaf DJ, Dwyer SM (2022) Fake it ‘til you make it: Hazards of a cultural norm in entrepreneurship. Bus. Horizons 65(5):681–696.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zankl J, Grimes M (2024) Taming unicorns: Toward a new normal of responsible entrepreneurship. Acad. Management Rev. 49(4):879–905.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhang V, Mohliver AC, King M (2023) Where is all the deviance? Liminal prescribing and the social networks underlying the prescription drug crisis. Admin. Sci. Quart. 68(1):228–269.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zott C, Huy QN (2007) How entrepreneurs use symbolic management to acquire resources. Admin. Sci. Quart. 52(1):70–105. Crossref, Google Scholar