Harnessing Academic Science for Corporate Technology: Interpersonal Networks and Absorptive Capacity

References

• Agrawal A (2006) Engaging the inventor: Exploring licensing strategies for university inventions and the role of latent knowledge. Strategic Management J. 27(1):63–79.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Alcácer J, Chung W (2007) Location strategies and knowledge spillovers. Management Sci. 53(5):760–776.Link, Google Scholar
• Allen T (1977) Managing the Flow of Technology: The Transfer and the Dissemination of Technological Information within the R&D Organization (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Anckaert PE, Cassiman B (2026) Fostering creativity through the exploitation of scientific and technological knowledge: An in-depth study of technology development in the lithium-ion battery field. Indust. Corporate Change 35(1):1–33.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arora A, Belenzon S, Patacconi A (2018) The decline of science in corporate R&D. Strategic Management J. 39(1):3–32.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arora A, Belenzon S, Sheer L (2021) Knowledge spillovers and corporate investment in scientific research. Amer. Econom. Rev. 111(3):871–898.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arts S, Veugelers R (2020) Taste for science, academic boundary spanning, and inventive performance of scientists and engineers in industry. Indust. Corporate Change 29(4):917–933.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arts S, Melluso N, Veugelers R (2025) Beyond citations: Measuring novel scientific ideas and their impact in publication text. Rev. Econom. Statist., ePub ahead of print January 28, https://doi.org/10.1162/rest_a_01561.Google Scholar
• Azoulay P, Ganguli I, Graff Zivin J (2017) The mobility of elite life scientists: Professional and personal determinants. Res. Policy 46(3):573–590.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Balconi M, Breschi S, Lissoni F (2004) Networks of inventors and the role of academia: An exploration of Italian patent data. Res. Policy 33(1):127–145.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Balsmeier B, Lück S, Fleming L (2025) Science knowledge localizes. Res. Policy 54(10):105333.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baruffaldi SH, Poege F (2025) Like stars: How firms learn at scientific conferences. Management Sci. 71(3):1865–1888.Google Scholar
• Bennett S, Carbone F, Karamalis F, Flavell R, Miller J, Heath W (1998) Help for cytotoxic-T-cell responses is mediated by CD40 signalling. Nature 393(6684):478–480.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bikard M (2018) Made in academia: The effect of institutional origin on inventors’ attention to science. Organ. Sci. 29(5):818–836.Link, Google Scholar
• Bikard M (2020) Idea twins: Simultaneous discoveries as a research tool. Strategic Management J. 41(8):1528–1543.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bikard M, Marx M (2020) Bridging academia and industry: How geographic hubs connect university science and corporate technology. Management Sci. 66(8):3425–3443.Link, Google Scholar
• Bikard M, Vakili K, Teodoridis F (2019) When collaboration bridges institutions: The impact of university–industry collaboration on academic productivity. Organ. Sci. 30(2):426–445.Link, Google Scholar
• Boudreau KJ, Brady T, Ganguli I, Gaule P, Guinan E, Hollenberg A, Lakhani KR (2017) A field experiment on search costs and the formation of scientific collaborations. Rev. Econom. Statist. 99(4):565–576.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Breschi S, Catalini C (2010) Tracing the links between science and technology: An exploratory analysis of scientists’ and inventors’ networks. Res. Policy 39(1):14–26.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bryan KA, Ozcan Y, Sampat B (2020) In-text patent citations: A user’s guide. Res. Policy 49(4):103946.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bush V (1945) Science: The Endless Frontier. A Report to the President on a Program for Postwar Scientific Research, National Science Foundation, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Cavallo A, Colombo MG, Foss NJ (2025) Internal organization and absorptive capacity in open innovation contexts: The roles of gatekeeping, task specialization, and delegation. Indust. Corporate Change 34(5):1006–1028.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cockburn IM, Henderson RM (1998) Absorptive capacity, coauthoring behavior, and the organization of research in drug discovery. J. Indust. Econom. 46(2):157–182.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohan A, Feldman S, Beltagy I, Downey D, Weld DS (2020) SPECTER: Document-level representation learning using citation-informed transformers. Jurafsky D, Chai J, Schluter N, Tetreault J, eds. Proc. 58th Annual Meeting Assoc. Comput. Linguistics (Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg, PA), 2270–2282.Google Scholar
• Cohen WM, Levinthal DA (1990) Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35(1):128–152.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen WM, Nelson RR, Walsh JP (2002) Links and impacts: The influence of public research on industrial R&D. Management Sci. 48(1):1–23.Link, Google Scholar
• Collins HM (1974) The TEA set: Tacit knowledge and scientific networks. Sci. Stud. 4(2):165–185.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cowan R, Jonard N, Zimmermann JB (2007) Bilateral collaboration and the emergence of innovation networks. Management Sci. 53(7):1051–1067.Link, Google Scholar
• Ellis HC (1965) The Transfer of Learning (Macmillan, New York).Google Scholar
• Ewens M, Marx M (2024) Firm age and invention: An open-access dataset. Working paper, Columbia Business School, New York, and Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
• Felin T, Foss NJ, Heimeriks KH, Madsen TL (2012) Microfoundations of routines and capabilities: Individuals, processes, and structure. J. Management Stud. 49(8):1351–1374.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fleming L, Sorenson O (2004) Science as a map in technological search. Strategic Management J. 25(8–9):909–928.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fleming L, King C III, Juda AI (2007) Small worlds and regional innovation. Organ. Sci. 18(6):938–954.Link, Google Scholar
• Fleming L, Greene H, Li GC, Marx M, Yao D (2019) Government-funded research increasingly fuels innovation. Science 364(6446):1139–1141.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gittelman M, Kogut B (2003) Does good science lead to valuable knowledge? Biotechnology firms and the evolutionary logic of citation patterns. Management Sci. 49(4):366–382.Link, Google Scholar
• Granovetter M (1973) The strength of weak ties. Amer. J. Sociol. 78(6):1360–1380.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hansen MT (1999) The search-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits. Admin. Sci. Quart. 44(1):82–111.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hengel E (2022) Publishing while female: Are women held to higher standards? Evidence from peer review. Econom. J. 132(648):2951–2991.Google Scholar
• Henrekson M, Rosenberg N (2001) Designing efficient institutions for science-based entrepreneurship: Lesson from the US and Sweden. J. Tech. Transfer 26(3):207–231.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jensen R, Thursby M (2001) Proofs and prototypes for sale: The licensing of university inventions. Amer. Econom. Rev. 91(1):240–259.Crossref, Google Scholar
• King G, Tomz M, Wittenberg J (2000) Making the most of statistical analyses: Improving interpretation and presentation. Amer. J. Political Sci. 44(2):341–355.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lane P, Lubatkin M (1998) Relative absorptive capacity and interorganizational learning. Strategic Management J. 19(5):461–477.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee JJ (2010) Heterogeneity, brokerage, and innovative performance: Endogenous formation of collaborative inventor networks. Organ. Sci. 21(4):804–822.Link, Google Scholar
• Liebeskind JP, Oliver AL, Zucker L, Brewer M (1996) Social networks, learning, and flexibility: Sourcing scientific knowledge in new biotechnology firms. Organ. Sci. 7(4):428–443.Link, Google Scholar
• Lissoni F (2010) Academic inventors as brokers. Res. Policy 39(7):843–857.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marx M (2026) Does patenting promote the progress of science? Evidence from a public database of patent paper pairs. Working paper, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
• Marx M, Fuegi A (2020) Reliance on science: Worldwide front-page patent citations to scientific articles. Strategic Management J. 41(9):1572–1594.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marx M, Hsu DH (2022) Revisiting the entrepreneurial commercialization of academic science: Evidence from ‘twin’ discoveries. Management Sci. 68(2):1330–1352.Link, Google Scholar
• Merton RK (1957) Priorities in scientific discovery: A chapter in the sociology of science. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 22(6):635–659.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Merton RK (1961) Singletons and multiples in scientific discovery: A chapter in the sociology of science. Proc. Amer. Philosophical Soc. 105(5):470–486.Google Scholar
• Mohnen M (2022) Stars and brokers: Knowledge spillovers among medical scientists. Management Sci. 68(4):2513–2532.Link, Google Scholar
• Mokyr J (2002) The Gifts of Athena: Historical Origins of the Knowledge Economy (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
• Moreira S, Markus A, Laursen K (2018) Knowledge diversity and coordination: The effect of intrafirm inventor task networks on absorption speed. Strategic Management J. 39(9):2517–2546.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mumtaz S (2025) Lost in translation? Science communication and the commercial diffusion of ideas. Working paper, Haas School of Business, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
• Murray F (2004) The role of academic inventors in entrepreneurial firms: Sharing in the laboratory life. Res. Policy 33(4):643–659.Crossref, Google Scholar
• National Science Board, National Science Foundation (2023) Publications output: U.S. trends and international comparisons. Report, NSB, Alexandria, VA.Google Scholar
• Nelson RR (1959) The simple economics of basic scientific research. J. Political Econom. 67(3):297–306.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Operti E, Carnabuci G (2014) Public knowledge, private gain: The effect of spillover networks on firms’ innovative performance. J. Management 40(4):1042–1074.Google Scholar
• Owen-Smith J, Powell W (2004) Knowledge networks as channels and conduits: The effects of spillovers in the Boston biotechnology community. Organ. Sci. 15(1):5–21.Link, Google Scholar
• Paruchuri S, Awate S (2017) Organizational knowledge networks and local search: The role of intra‐organizational inventor networks. Strategic Management J. 38(3):657–675.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pavitt K (1991) What makes basic research economically useful? Res. Policy 20(2):109–119.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Perkmann M, Salandra R, Tartari V, McKelvey M, Hughes A (2021) Academic engagement: A review of the literature 2011-2019. Res. Policy 50(1):104114.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Perkmann M, Tartari V, McKelvey M, Autio E, Broström A, D’Este P, Fini R, et al. (2013) Academic engagement and commercialisation: A review of the literature on university–industry relations. Res. Policy 42(2):423–442.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roach M, Cohen WM (2013) Lens or prism? Patent citations as a measure of knowledge flows from public research. Management Sci. 59(2):504–525.Link, Google Scholar
• Roche MP (2023) Academic entrepreneurship: Entrepreneurial advisors and their advisees’ outcomes. Organ. Sci. 34(2):959–986.Link, Google Scholar
• Rosenberg N (1990) Why do firms do basic research (with their own money)? Res. Policy 19(2):165–174.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sauermann H, Roach M (2012) Science PhD career preferences: Levels, changes, and advisor encouragement. PLoS One 7(5):1–9.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schaper T, Arts S, Veugelers R (2025) Not like the others: Frontier scientists for inventive performance. Res. Policy 54(10):105339.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Scharfmann E, Marx M, Fleming L (2025) Pasteur’s quadrant researchers bring novelty, impact to publishing, and patenting. Science 390(6776):891–893.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schoenberger S, Toes R, van der Voort E, Offringa R, Melief C (1998) T-cell help for cytotoxic T lymphocytes is mediated by CD40–CD40L interactions. Nature 393(6684):480–483.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shane S (2004) Academic Entrepreneurship: University Spinoffs and Wealth Creation (Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simeth M, Cincera M (2016) Corporate science, innovation, and firm value. Management Sci. 62(7):1970–1981.Link, Google Scholar
• Singh J (2005) Collaborative networks as determinants of knowledge diffusion patterns. Management Sci. 51(5):756–770.Link, Google Scholar
• Smalheiser NR, Torvik VI (2009) Author name disambiguation. Ann. Rev. Inform. Sci. Tech. 43(1):1–43.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Torvik VI (2018) Author-Linked Data for Author-ity 2009. Data set, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Champaign.Google Scholar
• Torvik VI (2021) MapAffil 2018 dataset: PubMed author affiliations mapped to cities and their geocodes worldwide with extracted disciplines, inferred GRIDs, and assigned ORCIDs. Data set, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Champaign.Google Scholar
• Torvik VI, Smalheiser NR (2009) Author name disambiguation in MEDLINE. ACM Trans. Knowledge Discovery Data 3(3):1–30.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Torvik VI, Smalheiser NR (2018) Author-ity 2009—PubMed author name disambiguated dataset. Data set, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Champaign.Google Scholar
• Tushman M (1977) Special boundary roles in the innovation process. Admin. Sci. Quart. 22(4):587–605.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tushman ML, Scanlan TJ (1981) Boundary spanning individuals: Their role in information transfer and their antecedents. Acad. Management J. 24(2):289–305.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vakili K, Teodoridis F, Bikard M (2022) Detrimental collaborations in creative work: Evidence from economics. Organ. Sci. 33(5):1741–1755.Link, Google Scholar
• Wasserman S, Faust K (1994) Social Network Analysis (Cambridge University Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zucker LG, Darby MR, Armstrong JS (2002) Commercializing knowledge: University science, knowledge capture, and firm performance in biotechnology. Management Sci. 48(1):138–153.Link, Google Scholar
• Zucker LG, Darby MR, Brewer MB (1998) Intellectual human capital and the birth of US biotechnology enterprises. Amer. Econom. Rev. 88(1):290–306.Google Scholar