What Drives Chief Executive Officer Activism and What Chief Executive Officer Activism Drives: Why Chief Executive Officers Speak Out, When Firms Translate Activist Stances into Action, and How Chief Executive Officer Activism Builds Social Momentum

References

• Ashforth BE, Mael F (1989) Social identity theory and the organization. Acad. Management Rev. 14(1):20–39.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Braun V, Clarke V (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Res. Psych. 3(2):77–101.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bromley P, Powell WW (2012) From smoke and mirrors to walking the talk: Decoupling in the contemporary world. Acad. Management Ann. 6(1):483–530.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bundy J, Shropshire C, Buchholtz AK (2013) Strategic cognition and issue salience: Toward an explanation of firm responsiveness to stakeholder concerns. Acad. Management Rev. 38(3):352–376.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burbano VC (2021) The demotivating effects of communicating a social-political stance: Field experimental evidence from an online labor market platform. Management Sci. 67(2):1004–1025.Link, Google Scholar
• Chaperon I (2024) Fed up with government bureaucracy, French bosses increasingly look at Trumpism with envy. Le Monde (December 13), https://www.lemonde.fr/en/economy/article/2024/12/13/fed-up-with-government-bureaucracy-french-bosses-increasingly-look-at-trumpism-with-envy_6736021_19.html.Google Scholar
• Chatterjee A, Hambrick DC (2007) It’s all about me: Narcissistic chief executive officers and their effects on company strategy and performance. Admin. Sci. Quart. 52(3):351–386.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chatterjee A, Hambrick DC (2011) Executive personality, capability cues, and risk taking: How narcissistic CEOs react to their successes and stumbles. Admin. Sci. Quart. 56(2):202–237.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chatterji AK, Toffel MW (2019) Assessing the impact of CEO activism. Organ. Environ. 32(2):159–185.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Christensen LT, Morsing M, Thyssen O (2013) CSR as aspirational talk. Organization 20(3):372–393.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Crilly D, Hansen M, Zollo M (2016) The grammar of decoupling: A cognitive-linguistic perspective on firms’ sustainability claims and stakeholders’ interpretation. Acad. Management J. 59(2):705–729.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Crilly D, Zollo M, Hansen MT (2012) Faking it or muddling through? Understanding decoupling in response to stakeholder pressures. Acad. Management J. 55(6):1429–1448.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Deephouse DL, Heugens P (2009) Linking social issues to organizational impact: The role of infomediaries and the infomediary process. J. Bus. Ethics 86(4):541–553.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Durand R, Hawn O, Ioannou I (2019) Willing and able: A general model of organizational responses to normative pressures. Acad. Management Rev. 44(2):299–320.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dutton JE, Dukerich JM, Harquail CV (1994) Organizational images and member identification. Admin. Sci. Quart. 39(2):239–263.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edelman (2023) 2023 Edelman trust barometer: Global report (Edelman). Accessed August 9, 2024, https://www.edelman.com/trust/2023/trust-barometer.Google Scholar
• Emmons RA (1981) Relationship between narcissism and sensation seeking. Psych. Rep. 48(1):247–250.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fereday J, Muir-Cochrane E (2006) Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: A hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. Internat. J. Qualitative Methods 5(1):80–92.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung (2025) Auf ihren eigenen Vorteil bedacht. Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung (May 7), https://www.faz.net/aktuell/politik/inland/erklaerung-deutscher-unternehmen-zum-8-mai-110461432.html.Google Scholar
• Gerstner WC, König A, Enders A, Hambrick DC (2013) CEO narcissism, audience engagement, and organizational adoption of technological discontinuities. Admin. Sci. Quart. 58(2):257–291.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gordon N (2022) One of China’s most outspoken corporate leaders said COVID lockdowns shorten life expectancy by 4 days per month. Then the censors came. Fortune (May 25), https://fortune.com/2022/05/25/trip-chairman-james-liang-weibo-suspended-china-covid-zero-censorship-economy/.Google Scholar
• Greene S (2004) Social identity theory and party identification. Soc. Sci. Quart. 85(1):136–153.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ham C, Seybert N, Wang S (2018) Narcissism is a bad sign: CEO signature size, investment, and performance. Rev. Accounting Stud. 23(1):234–264.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hambrick DC, Mason PA (1984) Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Acad. Management Rev. 9(2):193–206.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hambrick DC, Wowak AJ (2021) CEO sociopolitical activism: A stakeholder alignment model. Acad. Management Rev. 46(1):33–59.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hawn O, Ioannou I (2016) Mind the gap: The interplay between external and internal actions in the case of corporate social responsibility. Strategic Management J. 37(13):2569–2588.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hillman AJ, Hitt MA (1999) Corporate political strategy formulation: A model of approach, participation, and strategy decisions. Acad. Management Rev. 24(4):825–842.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hillman AJ, Keim GD, Schuler D (2004) Corporate political activity: A review and research agenda. J. Management 30(6):837–857.Google Scholar
• Hogg MA, Terry DJ (2000) Social identity and self-categorization processes in organizational contexts. Acad. Management Rev. 25(1):121–140.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Homroy S, Gangopadhyay S (2025) Strategic CEO activism in polarized markets. J. Financial Quant. Anal. 60(2):617–657.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hou Y, Poliquin CW (2023) The effects of CEO activism: Partisan consumer behavior and its duration. Strategic Management J. 44(3):672–703.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kets de Vries M (2004) Organizations on the couch: A clinical perspective on organizational dynamics. Eur. Management J. 22(2):183–200.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Khan M, Serafeim G, Yoon A (2016) Corporate sustainability: First evidence on materiality. Accounting Rev. 91(6):1697–1724.Crossref, Google Scholar
• King BG (2008) A political mediation model of corporate response to social movement activism. Admin. Sci. Quart. 53(3):395–421.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Larcker DF, Miles S, Tayan B, Wright-Violich K (2018) The double-edged sword of CEO activism. Closer Look Series No. CGRP-74, Rock Center for Corporate Governance at Stanford University Graduate School of Business Research Paper No. 19-5, Stanford, CA.Google Scholar
• Loughlin J (2023) CEO advocacy—The next step after ESG is to take a stand. Forbes Australia (January 29), https://www.forbes.com.au/news/leadership/ceo-advocacy-the-next-step-after-esg-is-to-take-a-stand/.Google Scholar
• Meyer DS, Staggenborg S (1996) Movements, countermovements, and the structure of political opportunity. Amer. J. Sociol. 101(6):1628–1660.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Meyer JW, Rowan B (1977) Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. Amer. J. Sociol. 83(2):340–363.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mkrtchyan A, Sandvik J, Zhu VZ (2024) CEO activism and firm value. Management Sci. 70(10):6519–6549.Link, Google Scholar
• Mohliver A, Crilly D, Kaul A (2023) Corporate social counterpositioning: How attributes of social issues influence competitive response. Strategic Management J. 44(5):1199–1217.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Morf CC, Rhodewalt F (2001) Unraveling the paradoxes of narcissism: A dynamic self-regulatory processing model. Psych. Inquiry 12(4):177–196.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Odziemkowska K, Briscoe F (2026) Contention, corporate activism, and collaboration: The blurring boundaries between firms and social movements. Acad. Management Ann. 20(2):628–662.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Petrenko OV, Aime F, Ridge J, Hill A (2016) Corporate social responsibility or CEO narcissism? CSR motivations and organizational performance. Strategic Management J. 37(2):262–279.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Polletta F, Jasper JM (2001) Collective identity and social movements. Annual Rev. Sociol. 27(1):283–305.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pollock TG, Lashley K, Rindova VP, Han JH (2019) Which of these things are not like the others? Comparing the rational, emotional, and moral aspects of reputation, status, celebrity, and stigma. Acad. Management Ann. 13(2):444–478.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Raskin R, Terry H (1988) A principal-components analysis of the Narcissistic Personality Inventory and further evidence of its construct validity. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 54(5):890–902.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rindova VP, Pollock TG, Hayward MLA (2006) Celebrity firms: The social construction of market popularity. Acad. Management Rev. 31(1):50–71.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Spicer A (2020) Playing the bullshit game: How empty and misleading communication takes over organizations. Organ. Theory 1(2):1–26.Google Scholar
• Tarrow SG (1998) Power in Movement: Social Movements and Contentious Politics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Verba S, Schlozman KL, Brady H, Nie NH (1993) Citizen activity: Who participates? What do they say? Amer. Political Sci. Rev. 87(2):303–318.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wowak AJ, Busenbark JR (2024) Why do some conservative CEOs publicly support liberal causes? Organizational ideology, managerial discretion, and CEO sociopolitical activism. Organ. Sci. 35(4):1388–1408.Link, Google Scholar
• Wowak AJ, Busenbark JR, Hambrick DC (2022) How do employees react when their CEO speaks out? Intra- and extra-firm implications of CEO sociopolitical activism. Admin. Sci. Quart. 67(2):553–593.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zajac EJ, Westphal JD (1994) The costs and benefits of managerial incentives and monitoring in large U.S. corporations: When is more not better? Strategic Management J. 15(S1):121–142.Crossref, Google Scholar