More Versus Better: Artificial Intelligence, Incentives, and the Emerging Crisis in Peer Review

References

• Anthony C (2021) When knowledge work and analytical technologies collide: The practices and consequences of black boxing algorithmic technologies. Admin. Sci. Quart. 66(4):1173–1212.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bechky BA, Davis GF (2025) Resisting the algorithmic management of science: Craft and community after generative AI. Admin. Sci. Quart. 70(1):1–22.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dell’Acqua F, Ayoubi C, Lifshitz H, Sadun R, Mollick E, Mollick L, Han Y, et al. (2026) The cybernetic teammate: A field experiment on generative AI and teamwork. Organ. Sci. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
• Dell’Acqua F, McFowland E III, Mollick E, Lifshitz H, Kellogg KC, Rajendran S, Krayer L, Candelon F, Lakhani KR (2026) Navigating the jagged technological frontier: Field experimental evidence of the effects of artificial intelligence on knowledge worker productivity and quality. Organ. Sci. 37(2):403–423.Link, Google Scholar
• Hasan S, Oettl A, Samila S (2025) From model design to organizational design: Complexity redistribution and trade-offs in generative AI. Preprint, submitted June 10, https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.22440.Google Scholar
• Jabarian B, Imas A (2025) Artificial writing and automated detection. NBER Working Paper No. 34223, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Jones N (2026) Leading preprint server clamps down on AI slop. Science 391(6784):432–433.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kusumegi K, Yang X, Ginsparg P, de Vaan M, Stuart T, Yin Y (2025) Scientific production in the era of large language models. Science 390(6779):1240–1243.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leonardi PM, Leavell V (2026) Knowing enough to be dangerous: The problem of “artificial certainty” for expert authority when using AI for decision making and planning. Organ. Sci. 37(2):516–543.Link, Google Scholar
• Liang W, Zhang Y, Wu Z, Lepp H, Ji W, Zhao X, Cao H, et al. (2025) Quantifying large language model usage in scientific papers. Nature Human Behav. 9:2599–2609.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Munger K, Bakker B, Berinsky A, Giger N, Guess A, Just N, Lawrence R, Tenenboim-Weinblatt K, van de Rijt A (2026) Peer review 2027: Scenarios for academic publishing in the age of AI. Preprint, submitted January 27, https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/594zj_v1.Google Scholar
• Naddaf M (2025) Major AI conference flooded with peer reviews written fully by AI. Nature 648(8093):256–257.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shaw SD, Nave G (2026) Thinking-fast, slow, and artificial: How AI is reshaping human reasoning and the rise of cognitive surrender. Preprint, submitted January 11, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.6097646.Google Scholar