Collaborative Product and Market Development: Theoretical Implications and Experimental Evidence

References

• Amaldoss W., Jain S. David vs. Goliath: an analysis of mixed strategy games and experimental evidence. Management Sci. (2002) 48:972–991Link, Google Scholar
• Amaldoss W., Jain S. Pricing of conspicuous goods: a competitive analysis of social effects. J. Marketing Res. (2005) 42:30–42Crossref, Google Scholar
• Amaldoss W., Rapoport A., Zwick R., Rapoport A. Effects of idiosyncratic investments in collaborative networks: an experimental analysis. Experimental Business Research (2005) II(Kluwer, Boston, MA) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Amaldoss W., Meyer R., Raju J., Rapoport A. Collaborating to compete. Marketing Sci. (2000) 19:105–126Link, Google Scholar
• Amegashie J. A. The design of rent-seeking competitions: committees, preliminary and final contests. Public Choice (1999) 99:63–76Crossref, Google Scholar
• Amir R., Evstigneev I., Wooders J. Noncooperative versus cooperative R&D with endogenous spillover rates. Games Econom. Behavior (2003) 42:183–207Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baye M., Hoppe H. The strategic equivalence of rent-seeking, innovation, and patent-race games. Games Econom. Behavior (2003) 44:217–226Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bayus B., Jain S., Rao A. Too little, too early: introduction timing and new product performance in the personal digital assistant industry. J. Marketing Res. (1997) 84:50–63Crossref, Google Scholar
• Booz Allen, Hamilton. New Products Management for the 1980s (1982) (New York)Google Scholar
• Boulding W., Christen M. Sustainable pioneering advantage? Profit implications of market entry order. Marketing Sci. (2003) 22:371–392Link, Google Scholar
• Bucklin L., Sengupta S. Organizing successful co-marketing alliances. J. Marketing (1993) 57:32–46Crossref, Google Scholar
• Clark D. J., Riis C. Contest success functions: an extension. Econom. Theory (1998a) 11:201–204Crossref, Google Scholar
• Clark D. J., Riis C. Competition over more than one prize. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1998b) 88:276–289Google Scholar
• Cohen L. When can government subsidize research joint ventures? Politics, economics, and limits to technology policy. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1994) 84:159–163Google Scholar
• Cohen W., Levinthal D. Innovation and learning: the two faces of R&D—implications for R&D investment. Econom. J. (1989) 99:569–596Google Scholar
• Davis D. D., Reilly R. J. Do too many cooks always spoil the stew? An experimental analysis of rent-seeking and the role of strategic buyer. Public Choice (1998) 95:89–115Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fullerton R., McAfee R. Auctioning entry into tournaments. J. Political Econom. (1999) 107:573–605Crossref, Google Scholar
• Griliches Z. Issues in assessing the contribution of R&D to productivity growth. Bell J. Econom. (1979) 10:92–116Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gulati R. Alliances and networks. Strategic Management J. (1998) 19:293–317Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jaffe A. Technological opportunity and spillover of R&D: evidence from firms’ patents, profits, and market value. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1986) 76:984–1001Google Scholar
• Kamien M., Muller E., Zang I. Research joint ventures and R&D cartels. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1992) 82:1293–1306Google Scholar
• Kamien M., Zang I. Competing research joint ventures. J. Econom. Management Strategy (1993) 2:23–40Crossref, Google Scholar
• Loury G. Market structure and innovation. Quart. J. Econom. (1979) 93:395–410Crossref, Google Scholar
• Luce R. D.Individual Choice Behavior (1959) (Wiley, New York) Google Scholar
• Mansfield E. Patents and innovation: an empirical study. Management Sci. (1986) 32:173–181Link, Google Scholar
• Millner E. L., Pratt M. D. An experimental investigation of efficient rent seeking. Public Choice (1989) 62:139–151Crossref, Google Scholar
• Millner E. L., Pratt M. D. Risk aversion and rent seeking: an extension and some experimental evidence. Public Choice (1991) 69:81–92Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mitchell W., Dussage P., Garette B. Alliances with competitors: how to combine and protect key resources. J. Creativity Innovation Management (2002) 11:1–21(Special Issue on Managing Knowledge for Innovation)Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nitzan S. Modelling rent-seeking contests. Eur. J. Political Econom. (1994) 10:41–60Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ofek E., Sarvary M. R&D, marketing and the success of next generation products. Marketing Sci. (2003) 22:503–519Link, Google Scholar
• Onculer A., Croson R. Rent-seeking for risky rent: a model and experimental investigation. (2003) . Working paper, INSEAD, FranceGoogle Scholar
• Park S., Ungson G. Interfirm rivalry and managerial complexity: a conceptual framework of alliance failure. Organ. Sci. (2001) 12:37–53Link, Google Scholar
• Potters J., de Vries C., van Winden G. An experimental examination of rational rent-seeking. Eur. J. Political Econom. (1999) 14:783–800Crossref, Google Scholar
• Raju J., Dhar S., Morrison D. The effect of package coupons on brand choice. Marketing Sci. (1994) 13:145–164Link, Google Scholar
• Rapoport A., Amaldoss W. Mixed strategies and iterative elimination of dominated strategies: an experimental investigation of states of knowledge. J. Econom. Behavior Organ. (2000) 42:483–521Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rapoport A., Amaldoss W. Mixed strategy play in single-stage all-pay auction with symmetric players. J. Econom. Behavior Organ. (2004) 54:585–607Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rindfleisch A., Moorman C. The acquisition and utilization of information in new product alliances: a strength of ties perspective. J. Marketing (2001) 65:1–18Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rindfleisch A., Moorman C. Interfirm cooperation and customer orientation. J. Marketing Res. (2003) 40:421–436Crossref, Google Scholar
• Robertson T. S., Gatignon H. Technology development mode: a transaction cost conceptualization. Strategic Management J. (1998) 19:515–531Crossref, Google Scholar
• Robinson W., Fornell C. Sources of market pioneer advantages in consumer goods industries. J. Marketing Res. (1985) 22:305–317Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shogren J. F., Baik K. H. Reexamining efficient rent seeking in laboratory markets. Public Choice (1991) 69:69–79Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shugan S. M. Marketing Science, models, monopoly models, and why we need them. Marketing Sci. (2002) 21(3):223–228Link, Google Scholar
• Shugan S. M. Endogeneity in marketing decision models. Marketing Sci. (2004) 23(1):1–3Link, Google Scholar
• Sivadas E., Dwyer R. An examination of organizational factor influencing new product success in internal and alliance-based processes. J. Marketing (2000) 64:31–49Crossref, Google Scholar
• Skaperdas S. Contest success functions. Econom. Theory (1996) 7:283–290Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tullock G. The welfare costs of tariffs, monopolies and theft. Western Econom. J. (1967) 5:224–232Google Scholar
• Tullock G., Buchanan J. M., Tollison R. D., Tullock G. Efficient rent-seeking. Toward a Theory of the Rent-Seeking Society (1980) (Texas A&M University Press, College Station, TX) 97–112Google Scholar
• Wathne K. H., Heide J. B. Opportunism in interfirm relationships: forms. outcomes, and solutions. J. Marketing (2000) 64:36–51Crossref, Google Scholar
• Williamson O. E. Credible commitments: using hostages to support exchange. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1983) 73:519–540Google Scholar
• Zirger B., Maidique M. A model of new product development: an empirical test. Management Sci. (1990) 36:867–883Link, Google Scholar
• Zwick R., Rapoport A., Chung Lo A. K., Muthukrishnan A. V. Consumer sequential search: Not enough or too much? Marketing Sci. (2003) 22(4):503–519Link, Google Scholar