Overchoice and Assortment Type: When and Why Variety Backfires

References

• Arnold Stephen J., Oum Tae H., Tigert Douglas J. Determining attributes in retail patronage: seasonal, temporal, regional, and international comparisons. J. Marketing Res. (1983) 20(May):149–157Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bayus Barry L., Putsis William P. Product proliferation: an empirical analysis of product line determinants and market outcomes. Marketing Sci. (1999) 18(2):137–153Link, Google Scholar
• Boatwright Peter, Nunes Joseph C. Reducing assortment: an attribute-based approach. J. Marketing (2001) 65(July):50–63Crossref, Google Scholar
• Broniarczyk Susan M., Hoyer Wayne D., McAlister Leigh. Consumers’ perceptions of the assortment offered in a grocery category: the impact of item reduction. J. Marketing Res. (1998) 35(May):166–176Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chernev Alexander. When more is less and less is more: the role of ideal point availability and assortment in consumer choice. J. Consumer Res. (2003) 30(September):170–183Crossref, Google Scholar
• Craig C. Samuel, Ghosh Avijit, McLafferty Sara. Models of retail location process: a review. J. Retailing (1984) 60(1):5–36Google Scholar
• Cristol Steven M., Sealey Peter. Simplicity Marketing (2000) (The Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Dhar Ravi. Consumer preference for a no-choice option. J. Consumer Res. (1997) 24(September):215–231Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dreze Xavier, Hoch Stephen J., Purk Mary E. Shelf management and space elasticity. J. Retailing (1994) 70(4):301–326Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fader Peter S., Hardie Bruce. Modeling consumer choice among SKUs. J. Marketing Res. (1996) 33(4):442–452Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoch Stephen J., Bradlow Eric T., Wansink Brian. The variety of an assortment. Marketing Sci. (1999) 18(4):527–546Link, Google Scholar
• Huber Joel, Payne John W., Puto Christopher. Adding asymmetrically dominated alternatives: violations of regularity and the similarity hypothesis. J. Consumer Res. (1982) 9(June):90–97Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huffman Cynthia, Kahn Barbara E. Variety for sale: mass customization or mass confusion. J. Retailing (1998) 74(4):491–513Crossref, Google Scholar
• Iyengar Sheena S., Lepper Mark R. When choice is demotivating: Can one desire too much of a good thing? J. Personality Soc. Psych. (2000) 79(6):995–1006Crossref, Google Scholar
• Johnson Michael J. Consumer choice strategies for comparing noncomparable alternatives. J. Consumer Res. (1984) 11(December):741–753Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahn Barbara E. Consumer variety-seeking among goods and services. J. Retailing Consumer Services (1995) 2(3):139–148Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahn Barbara E. Dynamic relationships with customers: high variety strategies. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. (1998) 26(1):45–53Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kotler Philip. Marketing Management: Analysis, Planning, Implementation and Control (1991) 7th ed.(Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
• Lehmann Donald R. Customer reactions to variety: too much of a good thing? J. Acad. Marketing Sci. (1998) 26(1):62–65Crossref, Google Scholar
• Louviere Jordan J., Gaeth Gary J. Decomposing the determinants of retail facility choice using the method of hierarchical information integration: a supermarket illustration. J. Retailing (1987) 63(1):25–48Google Scholar
• Luce R. Duncan. Individual Choice Behavior (1959) (John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York) Google Scholar
• Luce R. Duncan. The choice axiom after twenty years. J. Math. Psych. (1997) 15:215–233Crossref, Google Scholar
• Markman Arthur B., Medin Douglas L. Similarity and alignment in choice. Organ. Behavior Human Decision Processes (1995) 63(2):117–130Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shugan Steven M. The cost of thinking. J. Consumer Res. (1980) 7(September):99–111Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simonson Itamar. Choice based on reasons: the case of attraction and compromise effects. J. Consumer Res. (1989) 16(September):158–174Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simonson Itamar, Tversky Amos. Choice in context: tradeoff contrast and extremeness aversion. J. Marketing Res. (1992) 29(August):281–295Crossref, Google Scholar
• Toffler Alvin. Future Shock (1970) (Random House, New York) Google Scholar
• Tversky Amos. Elimination by aspects: a theory of choice. Psych. Rev. (1972) 79(July):281–299Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tversky Amos, Shafir Eldar. Choice under conflict: the dynamics of deferred decision. Psych. Sci. (1992) 3(6):358–361Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhang Shi, Fitzsimons Gavan J. Choice-process satisfaction: the influence of attribute alignability and option limitation. Organ. Behavior Human Decision Processes (1999) 77(3):192–214Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhang Shi, Markman Arthur B. Overcoming early entrant advantage: the role of alignable and nonalignable differences. J. Marketing Res. (1998) 35(November):413–426Crossref, Google Scholar