Practice Prize Article—CHAN4CAST: A Multichannel, Multiregion Sales Forecasting Model and Decision Support System for Consumer Packaged Goods

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.1050.0135

References

  • Abraham M., Lodish L. PROMOTER: an automated promotion evaluation system. Marketing Sci. (1987) 6(2):101–123LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Abraham M., Lodish L. An implemented system for improving promotion productivity using store scanner data. Marketing Sci. (1993) 12(3):248–269LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Alavi Maryam, Joachimsthaler Erich A. Revisiting DSS implementation research: a meta-analysis of the literature and suggestions for researchers. MIS Quart. (1992) 16(1):95–116CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Albers Sonke. A framework for analysis of profit contribution variance between actual and plan. Internat. J. Res. Marketing (1998) 15(2):109–122CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Allenby Greg M., Shivley Thomas S., Yang Sha, Garratt Mark J. A choice model for packaged goods: dealing with discrete quantities and quantity discounts. Marketing Sci. (2004) 23(1):95–108LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bell D., Chiang J., Padmanabhan V. The decomposition of promotional response: an empirical generalization. Marketing Sci. (1999) 18(4):504–526LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Besanko D., Gupta S., Jain D. Logit demand estimation under competitive pricing behavior: an equilibrium framework. Management Sci. (1998) 44(11):1533–1547LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Blattberg R. C., Levin A. Modeling the effectiveness and profitability of trade promotions. Marketing Sci. (1987) 6(2):124–146LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Blattberg R. C., Wisniewski K. Price-induced patterns of competition. Marketing Sci. (1989) 8(4):291–309LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bronnenberg B., Mela C. F. Market rollout and retail adoption of new brands. Marketing Sci. (2004) 23(4):490–499LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bolton Ruth N., Shankar Venkatesh. An empirically derived taxonomy of retailer pricing and promotion strategies. J. Retailing (2003) 79(4):213–224CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bucklin R., Gupta S. Commercial use of UPC scanner data: industry and academic perspectives. Marketing Sci. (1999) 18(3):247–273LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Christen M., Gupta S., Porter J., Staelin R., Wittink D. Using market level data to understand promotion effects in a nonlinear model. J. Marketing Res. (1997) 34(3):322–334CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Curley Kathleen F., Gremillion Lee L. The role of the champion in DSS implementation. Inform. Management (1983) 6(4):203–209CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dube J. P. Multiple discreteness and product differentiation: demand for carbonated soft drinks. Marketing Sci. (2004) 23(1):66–81LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Elrod T., Russell G., Shocker A., Rao V., Bayus B., Carroll D., Kamakura W., Shankar V. Inferring market structure from customer response to competing and complementary products. Marketing Lett. (2002) 13(3):221–232CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fader P. S., Hardie B. S., Armstrong J. S. Forecasting trial sales of new consumer packaged goods. Principles of Forecasting (2001) (Kluwer, Newell, MA) 613–630CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fader P. S., Hardie B. S., Huang Chun-Yao. A dynamic changepoint model for new product sales forecasting. Marketing Sci. (2004) 23(1):50–65LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Fockens E., Leeflang P., Wittink D. A comparison and exploration of the forecasting accuracy of a nonlinear model at different levels of aggregation. Internat. J. Forecasting (1994) 10(2):245–261CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Greene W.Econometric Analysis (2003) 5th ed.(Prentice-Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Guadagni P. H., Little J. D. C. A logit model of brand choice calibrated on scanner data. Marketing Sci. (1983) 2(Summer):327–351Google Scholar
  • Hoch S., Kim B., Montgomery A., Rossi P. Determinants of store-level price elasticity. J. Marketing Res. (1995) 32(1):17–29CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Inman J. J., Shankar V., Ferraro R. “You are where you shop”: an examination of product category-channel associations and the drivers of cross-channel variation in shopping behavior. (2002) . Working Paper Series 02-117, Marketing Science Institute, Boston, MAGoogle Scholar
  • Inman J. J., Shankar V., Ferraro R. The roles of channel-category associations and geo-demographics in channel patronage. J. Marketing (2004) 68(2):51–71CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Leeflang P. S. H., Wittink D. R. Building models for marketing decisions: past, present and future. Internat. J. Res. Marketing (2000) 17(2–3):105–126CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lilien G., Rangaswamy A.Marketing Engineering (2002) 2nd ed.(Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Little J. D. C. Models and managers: the concept of a decision calculus. Management Sci. (1970) 16(8):B466–LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Little J. D. C. Comments on “Models and managers: the concept of a decision calculus.”. Management Sci. (2004) 50(12):1854–1860LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Morris Steven A., Marshall Thomas E. Perceived control in information systems. J. Organ. End User Comput. (2004) 16(2):28–56CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Naik Prasad A., Raman Kalyan, Winer Russell S. Planning marketing-mix strategies in the presence of interaction effects. Marketing Sci. (2005) 24(1):25–34LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Roberts John H., Nelson Charles J., Morrison Pamela D. A prelaunch diffusion model for evaluating market defense strategies. Marketing Sci. (2005) 24(1):38–56LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Russell G., Ratneshwar S., Shocker A. D., Bell D., Bodapati A., Degeratu A., Hilderbrandt L., Kim N., Ramaswami S., Shankar V. Multiple category decision-making: review and synthesis. Marketing Lett. (1999) 10(3):319–332CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shankar Venkatesh, Bolton Ruth N. An empirical analysis of determinants of retailer pricing strategy. Marketing Sci. (2004) 23(1):28–49LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Silk A. J., Urban G. L. Pretest market evaluation of new packaged goods: a model and measurement methodology. J. Marketing Res. (1978) 15(2):171–191CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • van Bruggen G. H., Smidts A., Wierenga B. Improving decision making by means of a marketing decision support system. Management Sci. (1998) 44(5):645–658LinkGoogle Scholar
  • van Heerde H., Gupta S., Wittink D. Is 75% of the sales promotion bump due to brand switching? No, only 33% is. J. Marketing Res. (2003) 40(4):481–491CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • van Heerde H., Leeflang P. S. H., Wittink D. How promotions work: SCAN*PRO-based evolutionary model building. Schmalenbach Bus. Rev. (2002) 54(3):198–220CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wierenga B., van Bruggen G. H. Developing a customized decision-support system for brand managers. Interfaces (1997) 3(Part 2):S128–S145Google Scholar
  • Wierenga B., van Bruggen G. H.Marketing Management Support Systems: principles, Tools, and Implementation (2000) (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MA) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wierenga B., van Bruggen G. H., Staelin R. The success of marketing management support systems. Marketing Sci. (1999) 18(3):196–207LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Wittink D., Addona M., Hawkes W., Porter J. C. SCAN*PRO: the estimation, validation, and use of promotional effects based on scanner data. (1988) . Working paper, ACNielsen, Schaumburg, ILGoogle Scholar
  • Wu D. Alternative tests of independence between stochastic repressors and disturbances. Econometrica (1973) 41(4):733–750CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.