An Empirical Model of Optimal Dynamic Product Launch and Exit Under Demand Uncertainty

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.1050.0140

References

  • Ackerberg D. A. Advertising, learning, and consumer choice in experience good markets: A structural empirical examination. Internat. Econom. Rev. (2003) 44(3):1007–1040CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Aghion P., Bolton P., Harris C., Jullien B. Optimal learning by experimentation. Rev. Econom. Stud. (1991) 58:621–654CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Akçura M. T., Gönül F. F., Petrova E. Consumer learning and brand valuation: An application on over-the-counter drugs. Marketing Sci. (2004) 23(1):156–169LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Arrow K. J., Nerlove M. Optimal advertising policy under dynamic conditions. Economica, New Series (1962) 29:129–142CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bergemann D., Välimäki J. Market diffusion with two-sided learning. RAND J. Econom. (1997) 28(4):773–795CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Berry S. T. Estimation of a model of entry in the airline industry. Econometrica (1992) 60(4):889–917CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Berry S. T. Estimating discrete-choice models of product differentiation. RAND J. Econom. (1994) 25(2):242–262CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Berry S. T., Levinsohn J., Pakes A. Automobile prices in market equilibrium. Econometrica (1995) 63(4):841–890CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bresnahan T. F., Reiss P. C. Entry and competition in concentrated markets. J. Political Econom. (1991) 99(5):977–1009CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ching A. T. Consumer learning and heterogeneity: Dynamics of demand for prescription drugs after patent expiration. (2002) (University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada) Google Scholar
  • Churchill G. A.Marketing Research (1995) 6th ed.(The Dryden Press, Chicago, IL) Google Scholar
  • Cotterill R. W. High cereal prices and the prospects for relief by expansion of private label and antitrust enforcement. Agribusiness (1999) 15(2):229–245CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • DeGroot M. H.Optimal Statistical Decisions (1969) 3):620–638Google Scholar
  • Dixit A. Entry and exit decisions under uncertainty. J. Political Econom. (1989) 97(3):620–638CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dixit A. K., Pindyck R. S.Investment Under Uncertainty (1994) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dorfman R., Steiner P. O. Optimal advertising and optimal quality. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1954) 44:826–836Google Scholar
  • Erdem T., Keane M. P. Decision-making under uncertainty: Capturing brand choice processes in turbulent consumer goods markets. Marketing Sci. (1996) 15(1):1–20LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Erdem T., Imai S., Keane M. Brand and quantity choice dynamics under price uncertainty. Quant. Marketing Econom. (2003) 1:5–64CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gönül F., Shi M. Z. Optimal mailing of catalogs: A new methodology using estimable structural dynamic programming models. Management Sci. (1998) 44(9):1249–1262LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gönül F., Srinivasan K. Estimating the impact of consumer expectations of coupons on purchase behavior: A dynamic structural model. Marketing Sci. (1996) 15(3):262–279LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Harrington J. E. Experimentation and learning in a differentiated-products duopoly. J. Econom. Theory (1995) 66:275–288CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hausman J. A., Bresnahan T. F., Gordon R. J. Valuation of new goods under perfect and imperfect competition. The Economics of New Goods (1996) (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL) 209–237Google Scholar
  • Hendel I., Nevo A. Measuring the implications of sales and consumer stockpiling behavior. (2005) . NBER Working Paper 11307Google Scholar
  • Judd K. L. Credible spatial preemption. RAND J. Econom. (1985) 16(2):153–166CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Judd K. L., Riordan M. H. Price and quality in a new product monopoly. Rev. Econom. Stud. (1994) 61(4):773–789CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kadiyali V. Entry, its deterrence, and its accommodation: A study of the U.S. photographic film industry. RAND J. Econom. (1996) 27(3):452–478CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lehmann D. R., Gupta S., Steckel J. H.Marketing Research (1998) (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA) Google Scholar
  • Little J. D. C. A model of adaptive control of promotional spending. Oper. Res. (1966) 14(6):1075–1097LinkGoogle Scholar
  • McLennan A. Price dispersion and incomplete learning in the long run. J. Econom. Dynam. Control (1984) 7:331–347CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Melnikov O. Demand for differentiated durable products: The case of the U.S. computer printer market. (2001) . Manuscript, Yale University, New Haven, CTGoogle Scholar
  • Montgomery A. L., Bradlow E. T. Why analyst overconfidence about the functional form of demand models can lead to overpricing. Marketing Sci. (1999) 18(4):569–583LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Moscarini G., Smith L. The optimal level of experimentation. Econometrica (2001) 69(6):1629–1644CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nevo A. A practitioner’s guide to estimation of random-coefficients logit models of demand. J. Econom. Management Strategy (2000) 9(4):513–548CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nevo A. Measuring market power in the ready-to-eat cereal industry. Econometrica (2001) 69(2):307–342CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pekelman D., Tse E. Experimentation and budgeting in advertising: An adaptive control approach. Oper. Res. (1980) 28(2):321–347LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Raman K., Chatterjee R. Optimal monopolist pricing under demand uncertainty in dynamic markets. Management Sci. (1995) 41(1):144–162LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Rao V. R., Winter F. W. A Bayesian approach to test market selection. Management Sci. (1981) 27(12):1351–1369LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Roberts J. H., Urban G. L. Modeling multiattribute utility, risk, and belief dynamics for new consumer durable brand choice. Management Sci. (1988) 34(2):167–185LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Roberts K., Weitzman M. L. Funding criteria for research, development, and exploration projects. Econometrica (1981) 49(5):1261–1288CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rust J. Optimal replacement of GMC bus engines: An empirical model of Harold Zurcher. Econometrica (1987) 55(5):999–1033CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schmalensee R. Entry deterrence in the ready-to-eat breakfast cereal industry. Bell J. Econom. (1978) 9:305–327CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Song I., Chintagunta P. K. A micromodel of new product adoption with heterogeneous and forward-looking consumers: Application to the digital camera category. Quant. Marketing Econom. (2003) 1(3):371–407CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Trefler D. The ignorant monopolist: Optimal learning with endogenous information. Internat. Econom. Rev. (1993) 34(3):565–581CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Urban G. L., Hauser J. R.Design and Marketing of New Products (1993) 2nd ed.(Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Urban G. L., Katz G. M. Pre-test-market models: Validation and managerial implications. J. Marketing Res. (1983) 20(3):221–234CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wald A. Sequential method of sampling for deciding between two courses of action. J. Amer. Statist. Association (1945) 277–306CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.