Understanding Geographical Markets of Online Firms Using Spatial Models of Customer Choice

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.1050.0145

References

  • Breslow N. E., Clayton D. G. Approximate inference in generalized linear mixed models. J. Amer. Statist. Association (1993) 88:9–25Google Scholar
  • Bronnenberg Bart J., Mahajan Vijay. Unobserved retailer behavior in multimarket data: Joint spatial dependence in market shares and promotion variables. Marketing Sci. (2001) 20(3):284–299LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bronnenberg Bart J., Mela Carl F. Market roll-out and retailer adoption for new brands. Marketing Sci. (2004) 23(4):500–518LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bronnenberg Bart J., Sismeiro Catarina. Using multimarket data to predict brand performance in markets for which no or poor data exist. J. Marketing Res. (2002) 39(February):1–17CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brown Lawrence D., Cai T. Tony, Dasgupta Anirban. Confidence intervals for a binomial proportion and asymptotic expansions. Ann. Statist. (2002) 30(1):160–201CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Caffo Brian S., Jank Wolfgang S., Jones Galin L. Ascent-based Monte Carlo EM. J. Roy. Statist. Soc., Series B (2005) 67(2):235–252CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Carton Sean. Geotargeting: Why it matters to marketers. (2003) . ClickZ 4-7-2003, available at www.clickz.com/tech/lead-edge/ article.php/2176361. article.php/3340591Google Scholar
  • Cressie Noel A. C.Statistics for Spatial Data (1993) Revised ed.(Wiley, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Debruyne Marion, Reibstein David J. Competitor see, Competitor do: Incumbent entry in new market niches. Marketing Sci. (2005) 24(1):55–66LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Dempster A. P., Laird N. M., Rubin D. B. Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. B (1977) 39:1–22Google Scholar
  • Donthu Naveen. Comparing market areas using kernel density estimation. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. (1991) 19(4):323–332CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Donthu Naveen, Rust Roland T. Estimating geographic customer densities using kernel density estimation. Marketing Sci. (1989) 8(Spring):191–203LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Federal Communications Commission Section 706 report, Advanced services inquiry. (2004) March). Available at http://www. fcc.gov/ broadband/706.htmlGoogle Scholar
  • Garber Tal, Goldenberg Jacob, Libai Barak, Muller Eitan. From density to destiny: Using spatial dimension of sales data for early prediction of new product success. Marketing Sci. (2004) 23(3):419–428LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gartner Report Print publishers are uncertain about their digital future. (2003) September). Available at http://www. gartnerg2.com/qa/qa-0903-0051.asp Google Scholar
  • Guadagni P. M., Little J. D. C. A logit model of brand choice calibrated on scanner data. Marketing Sci. (1983) 2(3):203–238LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kalnins Arturs. An empirical analysis of territorial encroachment within franchised and company-owned branded chains. Marketing Sci. (2004) 23(4):476–489LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lipke David J. You are here. Amer. Demographics (2001) 23(30):65–68Google Scholar
  • Louis Thomas A. Finding the observed information matrix when using the EM algorithm. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. B (1982) 44:226–233Google Scholar
  • McFadden D., Manski C., McFadden D. Econometric models of probabilistic choice. Structural Analysis of Discrete Data (1981) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Mittal Vikas, Kamakura Wagner, Govind R. Geographic patterns in customer service and satisfaction: An empirical investigation. J. Marketing (2004) 68(July):48–62CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Montgomery Alan L., Li Shibo, Srinivasan Kannan, Liechty John. Modeling online browsing and path analysis using clickstream data. Marketing Sci. (2004) 23(4):579–595LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Parker Pamela. Google focuses local ad targeting. ClickZ News (2004) April 15). Available at ClickZ, 4-7-2003, available at www.clickz.com/tech/lead-edge/http://www.clickz.com/news/article.php/3340591Google Scholar
  • Rust Roland T., Donthu Naveen. Capturing geographically localized misspecification error in retail store choice models. J. Marketing Res. (1995) 32(February):103–110CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sismeiro Catarina, Bucklin Randolph E. Modeling purchase behavior at an E-commerce website: A task completion approach. J. Marketing Res. (2004) 41(3):306–323CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Steenburgh T., Ainslie A., Engebretson P. H. Revealing the information in zipcodes: Bayesian massively categorical variables and aggregated data in direct marketing. Marketing Sci. (2003) 22(1):40–57LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ter Hofstede Frenkel, Wedel Michel, Steenkamp Jan-Benedict E. M. Identifying spatial segments in international markets. Marketing Sci. (2002) 21(2):160–177LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Train Kenneth E.Discrete Choice Models with Simulation (2003) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Van den Bulte Christophe, Stremersch Stefan. Social contagion and income heterogeneity in new product diffusion: A meta-analytic test. Marketing Sci. (2004) 23(4):530–544LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Zeger S. L., Karim M. R. Generalized linear models with random effects: A Gibbs sampling approach. J. Amer. Statist. Association (1991) 86:79–86CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zhang Hao. On estimation and prediction for spatial generalized linear mixed models. Biometrics (2002) 58:129–136CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zhang Hao. Optimal interpolation and the appropriateness of cross-validating variogram in spatial generalized linear mixed models. J. Comput. Graphical Statist. (2003) 12:698–713CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.