Marketing and Designing Transaction Games

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.1050.0174

References

  • Alderson Wroe. A marketing view of competition. J. Marketing (1937) 1(3):189–190CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Amaldoss Wilfred, Jain Sanjay. Pricing of conspicuous goods: A competitive analysis of social effects. J. Marketing Res. (2005) 42(1):30–42CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Aumann Robert J., Maschler Michael. Game theoretic analysis of a bankruptcy problem from the Talmud. J. Econom. Theory (1985) 36(2):195–213CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baligh Helmy H., Richartz Leon E. Variable-sum game models of marketing problems. J. Marketing Res. (1967) 4(2):173–183CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Biyalogorsky Eyal, Gerstner Eitan. Contingent pricing to reduce price risks. Marketing Sci. (2004) 23(1):146–155LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bolton Gary E., Ockenfels Axel. ERC: A theory of equity, reciprocity and competition. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2000) 90(1):166–193CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bolton Gary E., Zwick R. Anonymity versus punishment in ultimatum bargaining. Games Econom. Behavior (1995) 10(1):95–121CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Campbell Colin M., Levin Dan. When and why not to auction. Econom. Theory. (2006) 27(3):583–596ForthcomingCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chakravarti Dipankar, Greenleaf Eric, Sinha Atanu, Cheema Amar, Cox James C., Friedman Daniel, Ho Teck H., Isaac R. Mark, Mitchell Andrew A., Rapoport Amnon, Rothkopf Michael H., Srivastava Joydeep, Zwick Rami. Auctions: Research opportunities in marketing. Marketing Lett. (2002) 13(3):281–296CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Desai Preyas S., Purohit Devavrat. “Let me talk to my manager”: Haggling in a competitive environment. Marketing Sci. (2004) 23(2):219–233LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Fay Scott. Partial-repeat-bidding in the name-your-own-price channel. Marketing Sci. (2004) 23(3):407–418LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Fudenberg Drew, Levine David K. Reputation and equilibrium selection in games with a patient player. Econometrica (1989) 57(4):759–778CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fudenberg Drew, Maskin Eric. The folk theorem in repeated games with discounting and with incomplete information. Econometrica (1986) 54(3):533–554CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Glosten Lawrence, Milgrom Paul. Bid, ask, and transaction prices in a specialist market with heterogeneously informed traders. J. Financial Econom. (1985) 14(1):71–100CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Godes David. In the eye of the beholder: An analysis of the relative value of a top sales rep across firms and products. Marketing Sci. (2003) 22(2):161–187LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Goeree Jacob K., Holt Charles A. Ten little treasures of game theory and ten intuitive contradictions. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2001) 91(5):1402–1422CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gould John P. The economics of markets: A simple model of the market-making process. J. Bus. (1980) 53(3):S167–S187CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Grossman Sanford J., Hart Oliver D. The costs and benefits of ownership: A theory of vertical and lateral integration. J. Political Econom. (1986) 94(4):691–719CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Guth Werner. A theoretical development of the concept “many market participants’. Eur. J. Marketing (1980) 14(9):46–46Google Scholar
  • Howard John A. Operations research and market research. J. Marketing (1955) 20(2):143–149CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Iyer Ganesh, Pazgal Amit. Internet shopping agents: Virtual co-location and competition. Marketing Sci. (2003) 22(1):85–106LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Jeuland Abel P., Shugan Steven. Managing channel profits. Marketing Sci. (1983) 2(3):239–272LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kauffman Ralph G., Leszczyc Peter T. L. Popkowski. An optimization approach to business buyer choice sets: How many suppliers should be included? Indust. Marketing Management (2005) 34(1):3–12CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Klemperer Paul. Auction theory: A guide to the literature. J. Econom. Surveys (1999) 13(3):227–286CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kuksov Dmitri. Buyer search costs and endogenous product design. Marketing Sci. (2004) 23(4):490–499LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Laffont Jean-Jacques. Game theory and empirical economics: The case of auction data. Eur. Econom. Rev. (1997) 41(1):1–35CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McAfee R. Preston, McMillan John. Competition and game theory. J. Marketing Res. (1996) 33(3):263–267CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McAfee R. Preston. Mechanism design by competing sellers. Econometrica (1993) 61(6):1281–1312CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mishra Birendra K., Prasad Ashutosh. Centralized pricing versus delegating pricing to the salesforce under information asymmetry. Marketing Sci. (2004) 23(1):21–27LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Myerson Riger B.Game Theory (1991) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Ofek Elie, Sarvary Miklos. R&D, marketing, and the success of next-generation products. Marketing Sci. (2003) 22(3):355–370LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ostrom Elinor, Gardner Roy, Walker James. Rules, Games, and Common-Pool Resources (1994) (University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pinker Edieal J., Seidmann Abraham, Vakrat Yaniv. Managing online auctions: Current business and research issues. Management Sci. (2003) 49(11):1457–1484LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Rabin Matthew. Incorporating fairness into game theory and economics. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1993) 83(5):1281–302Google Scholar
  • Shaffer Greg, Zettelmeyer Florian. Advertising in a distribution channel. Marketing Sci. (2004) 23(4):619–628LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Shugan Steven M. Editorial: Defining interesting research problems. Marketing Sci. (2003) 22(1):1–14LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Shugan Steven M. Editorial: The impact of advancing technology on marketing and academic research. Marketing Sci. (2004) 23(4):469–475LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Shugan Steven M., Xie Jinhong. Advance selling for services. California Management Rev. (2004) 46(3):37–54CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tyagi Rajeev K. Do strategic conclusions depend on how price is defined in models of distribution channels? J. Marketing Res. (2005) 42(2):228–232CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zwick Rami, Rapoport Amnon, Lo Alison King Chung, Muthukrishnan A. V. Consumer sequential search: Not enough or too much? Marketing Sci. (2003) 22(4):503–519LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Zwick Rami, Chen Xiao-Ping. What price fairness? A bargaining study. Management Sci. (1999) 45(6):804–823LinkGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.