Spiffed-Up Channels: The Role of Spiffs in Hierarchical Selling Organizations

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.1060.0204

References

  • Anderson E. The salesperson as outside agent or employee: A transaction cost analysis. Marketing Sci. (1985) 4(3):234–254LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Anderson E., Oliver R. L. Perspective on behavior-based versus outcome-based salesforce control systems. J. Marketing (1987) 51(4):76–88CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Anderson E., Trinkle B.Outsourcing the Sales Function: The Real Costs of Field Sales (2005) (Thompson/South-Western, Mason, OH) Google Scholar
  • Baron D. P., Besanko D. Information, control, and organizational structure. J. Econom. Management Strategy (1992) 1(2):237–275CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Basu A. K., Lal R., Srinivasan V., Staelin R. Sales force compensation plans: An agency theoretic perspective. Marketing Sci. (1985) 4(4):267–291LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bernheim B. D., Whinston M. D. Hierarchies and bureaucracies: On the role of collusion in organizations. J. Law, Econom. Organ. (1986) 2(2):181–214Google Scholar
  • Choi S. C. Price competition in a channel structure with a common retailer. Marketing Sci. (1991) 10(4):271–296LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Churchill G. A., Ford N. M., Walker O. C.Salesforce Management (1997) 5th ed.(Irwin, Chicago, IL)Google Scholar
  • Coughlan A. T. Competition and cooperation in marketing channel choice: Theory and application. Marketing Sci. (1985) 4(2):110–129LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Coughlan A. T., Lilien Gary L., Eliashberg Jehoshua. Sales compensation: A review of MS/OR advances. Handbooks in Operations Research and Management Science (1993) 5(Elsevier Science Publishers, North-Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) 611–651Google Scholar
  • Coughlan A. T., Sen S. K. Salesforce compensation: Theory and managerial implications. Marketing Sci. (1989) 8(4):324–342LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Coughlan A. T., Anderson E., Stern L. W., El-Ansary A. I.Marketing Channels (2006) 7th ed.(Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Economist, The The insurance scandal—Just how rotten? Economist (2004) 373(8398):69–71Google Scholar
  • Electronics Representatives Association The rep firm business model is changing. Representor (2003) Spring):4–11Google Scholar
  • Elkind P. Spitzer’s crusade. Fortune (2004) 150(10):129–132Google Scholar
  • Farley J. U. An optimal plan for salesmen’s compensation. J. Marketing Res. (1964) 1(2):39–43CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Farley J. U., Weinberg C. B. Inferential optimization: An algorithm for determining optimal sales commissions in multiproduct sales forces. Oper. Res. Quart. (1975) 26(2):413–418CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • General Services Administration (GSA) GSA 1997–98 request for offers: Centralized household goods traffic management program (CHAMP). (1997) . Accessed December 8, 2005, http://apps.fss.gsa.gov/fsstt/archives/hhg_rfo.htmGoogle Scholar
  • Godes D. In the eye of the beholder: An analysis of the relative value of a top sales rep across firms and products. Marketing Sci. (2003) 22(2):161–187LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hauser J. R., Simester D. I., Wernerfelt B. Customer satisfaction incentives. Marketing Sci. (1994) 13(4):327–350LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Heide J. B., John G. Do norms matter in marketing relationships? J. Marketing (1992) 56(2):32–45CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Holmstrom B., Milgrom P. Aggregation and linearity in the provision of intertemporal incentives. Econometrica (1987) 55(2):303–328CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Holmstrom B., Milgrom P. Multitask principal-agent analyses: Incentive contracts, asset ownership, and job design. J. Law, Econom., Organ. (1991) 7(Special Issue):24–51CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ingene C. A., Parry M. E. Channel coordination when retailers compete. Marketing Sci. (1995) 14(4):360–377LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ingene C. A., Parry M. E. Is channel coordination all it is cracked up to be? J. Retailing (2000) 76(4):511–547CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Iyer G., Villas-Boas J. M. A bargaining theory of distribution channels. J. Marketing Res. (2003) 40(4):80–100CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jeuland A. P., Shugan S. M. Managing channel profits. Marketing Sci. (1983) 3(2):239–272LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Jeuland A. P., Shugan S. M. Channel of distribution profits when channel members form conjectures. Marketing Sci. (1988) 7(2):202–210LinkGoogle Scholar
  • John G., Weitz B. Salesforce compensation: An empirical investigation of factors related to use of salary versus incentive compensation. J. Marketing Res. (1989) 26(1):1–14CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Joseph K., Thevaranjan A. Monitoring and incentives in sales organizations: An agency-theoretic perspective. Marketing Sci. (1998) 17(2):107–123LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kofman F., Lawarree J. Collusion in hierarchical agency. Econometrica (1993) 61(3):629–656CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Laffont J., Martimort D. Collusion and delegation. RAND J. Econom. (1998) 29(2):280–305CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Laffont J., Tirole J. The politics of government decision-making: A theory of regulatory capture. Quart. J. Econom. (1991) 106(4):1089–1127CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lal R. Improving channel coordination through franchising. Marketing Sci. (1990) 9(4):299–318LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lal R., Srinivasan V. Compensation plans for single- and multi-product salesforces: An application of the Holmstrom-Milgrom model. Management Sci. (1993) 39(7):777–793LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Mantrala M. K., Raman K., Desiraju R. Sales quota plans: Mechanisms for adaptive learning. Marketing Lett. (1997) 8(4):393–405CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Manufacturer’s Agents National Association (MANA) The importance of providing incentive to reps. Agency Sales (2001a) 31(5):44–45Google Scholar
  • Manufacturer’s Agents National Association (MANA) Survey details manufacturers’ use of reps. Agency Sales (2001b) 31(12):44–45Google Scholar
  • Manufacturer’s Agents National Association (MANA) Agents tell what they are willing to do when a special effort is needed. Agency Sales (2001c) 32(3):35Google Scholar
  • McAfee R. P., McMillan J. Organizational diseconomies of scale. J. Econom. Management Strategy (1995) 4(3):399–426CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McGuire T. W., Staelin R. An industry equilibrium analysis of downstream vertical integration. Marketing Sci. (1983) 2(2):161–192LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Melumad N. D., Mookherjee D., Reichelstein S. Hierarchical decentralization of incentive contracts. RAND J. Econom. (1995) 26(4):654–672CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Minority Business Development Agency (MBDA) Using sales reps and distribution channels for market entry. (2003) . Accessed December 30, 2004, http://www.mbda.gov/?section_id=5&bucket_id=161&content_id=2357&method=printerGoogle Scholar
  • Moorthy K. S. Managing channel profits: Comment. Marketing Sci. (1987) 6(4):375–379LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Moorthy K. S. Strategic decentralization in channels. Marketing Sci. (1988) 7(4):335–355LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Novick H. J.Understanding the Outsourced Sales Professional (2000) (Manufacturers and Agents National Education Foundation, Laguna Hills, CA) Google Scholar
  • Pratt J. W. Risk aversion in the small and in the large. Econometrica (1964) 32(1–2):122–136CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Raju J., Zhang J. Channel coordination in the presence of a dominant retailer. Marketing Sci. (2005) 24(2):254–262LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Research Institute of America When, where, and how to use manufacturer’s representatives. (1975) . Staff report, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  • Shugan S. M. Implicit understanding in channels of distribution. Management Sci. (1985) 31(4):435–460LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Shugan S. M. Marketing and designing transaction games. Marketing Sci. (2005) 24(4):525–530LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Srikonda S. L. P. A rep’s balancing act. Indust. Distribution (2001) 90(2):58–64Google Scholar
  • Srinivasan V. An investigation of the equal commission rate policy for a multi-product sales force. Management Sci. (1981) 27(7):731–756LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Teal K. M. Agencies analyze payment strategies, offer holiday sales tips. (2004) . Telecom Agents Group, Masterminds. Accessed December 31, 2004, http://www.telecomagentsgroup.comarticles/4b1master.aspxGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.