Price as a Stimulus to Think: The Case for Willful Overpricing

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.1060.0222

References

  • Belk R. W. Possessions and the extended self. J. Consumer Res. (1988) 15(2):139–168CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bernheim D. B. A theory of conformity. J. Political Econom. (1994) 102(5):841–877CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bertini M., Wathieu L. The framing effect of price format. (2006) . Working paper, Harvard Business School, Boston, MAGoogle Scholar
  • Carpenter G. S., Nakamoto K. Competitive strategies for late entry into a market with a dominant brand. Management Sci. (1990) 36(10):1268–1278LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Carpenter G. S., Glazer R., Nakamoto K. Meaningful brands from meaningless differentiation: The dependence on irrelevant attributes. J. Marketing Res. (1994) 31(3):339–350CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Celsi R. L., Olson J. C. The role of involvement in attention and comprehension processes. J. Consumer Res. (1988) 15(2):210–224CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gerstner E. Do higher prices signal higher quality? J. Marketing Res. (1985) 22(2):209–215CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gotlieb J. B., Swan J. E. An application of the elaboration likelihood model. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. (1990) 18(3):221–228CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hart O. D. Monopolistic competition in a large economy with differentiated commodities. Rev. Econom. Stud. (1979) 46(1):1–30CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hauser J. R., Toubia O. The impact of utility balance and endogeneity in conjoint analysis. Marketing Sci. (2005) 24(3):498–507LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hauser J. R., Wernerfelt B. An evaluation cost model of consideration sets. J. Consumer Res. (1990) 16(4):393–408CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Huber O. The influence of some task variables on cognitive operations in an information-processing decision model. Acta Psychologica (1980) 45(1–3):187–196CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Johnson E. J., Payne J. W. Effort and accuracy in choice. Management Sci. (1985) 31(4):395–414LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Johnson M. D. Modeling choice strategies for noncomparable alternatives. Marketing Sci. (1986) 5(1):37–54LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kozielecki J. Towards a theory of transgressive decision making: Reaching beyond everyday life. Acta Psychologica (1989) 70(1):43–63CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Liechty J. C., Fong D. K. H., DeSarbo W. S. Dynamic models incorporating individual heterogeneity: Utility evolution in conjoint analysis. Marketing Sci. (2005) 24(2):285–293LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Luce M. F., Bettman J. R., Payne J. W. Choice processing in emotionally difficult decisions. J. Experiment. Psych.: Learn., Memory Cognition (1997) 23(2):384–405CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mandler G., Clarke M. S., Fiske S. T. The structure of value: Accounting for taste. Perception, Cognition and Development: Interactional Analysis (1982) (Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Meyers-Levy J., Tybout A. M. Schema congruity as a basis for product evaluation. J. Consumer Res. (1989) 16(1):39–54CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Meyers-Levy J., Louise T. A., Curren M. T. How does the congruity of brand names affect evaluations of brand name extensions? J. Appl. Psych. (1994) 79(1):46–53CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Milgrom P., Roberts J. Price and advertising signals of product quality. J. Political Econom. (1986) 94(4):796–821CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Morwitz V. G., Armstrong J. S. Methods for forecasting from intentions data. Principles of Forecasting: A Handbook for Researchers and Practitioners (2000) (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
  • Nelson P. Advertising as information. J. Political Econom. (1974) 82(4):729–754CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ofek E., Srinivasan V. How much does the market value an improvement in a product attribute? Marketing Sci. (2002) 21(4):398–411LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ozanne J. L., Brucks M. L., Grewal D. A study of information search behavior during the categorization of new products. J. Consumer Res. (1992) 18(4):452–463CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Payne J. W., Bettman J. R., Johnson E. J.The Adaptive Decision Maker (1993) (Cambridge University Press, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Petty R. E., Cacioppo J. T., Berkowitz L. The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (1986) (Academic Press, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Raiffa H.Decision Analysis: Introductory Lectures on Choices Under Uncertainty (1968) (Addison Wesley, Reading, MA) Google Scholar
  • Rao A. R., Monroe K. B. The effect of price, brand name, and store name on buyers’ perceptions of product quality: An integrative review. J. Marketing Res. (1989) 26(3):351–357CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ratneshwar S., Shocker A. D. Substitution in use and the role of usage context in product category structures. J. Marketing Res. (1991) 28(3):281–295CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shaked A., Sutton J. Relaxing price competition through product differentiation. Rev. Econom. Stud. (1982) 49(1):3–13CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sherry J. F. The soul of the company store: Nike Town Chicago and the emplaced brandscape. ServiceScapes: The Concept of Place in Contemporary Markets (1998) (NTC Business Books, Lincolnwood, IL) Google Scholar
  • Shiv B., Carmon Z., Ariely D. Placebo effects of marketing actions: Consumers get what they pay for. J. Marketing Res. (2005) 42(4):383–393CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shugan S. M. The cost of thinking. J. Consumer Res. (1980) 7(2):99–111CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stayman D. M., Alden D. L., Smith K. H. Some effects of schematic processing on consumer expectations and disconfirmation judgments. J. Consumer Res. (1992) 19(2):240–255CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sujan M., Bettman J. R. The effects of brand positioning strategies on consumers’ brand and category perceptions: Some insights from schema research. J. Marketing Res. (1989) 26(4):454–467CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Telser L. G. Advertising and competition. J. Political Econom. (1964) 72(6):537–562CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tesser A., Martin L., Mendolia M., Petty R. E., Krosnick J. A. The impact of thought on attitude extremity and attitude-behavior consistency. Attitude Strength: Antecedents and Consequences (1995) (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Wathieu L., Muthukrishnan A. V., Bronnenberg B. The asymmetric effect of discount retraction on subsequent choice. J. Consumer Res. (2004) 31(3):652–657CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wathieu L., Brenner L., Carmon Z., Chattopadhyay A., Drolet A., Gourville J. T., Muthukrishnan A. V., Novemsky N., Ratner R., Wertenbroch K., Wu G. Consumer control and empowerment: A primer. Marketing Lett. (2002) 13(3):297–305CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wertenbroch K., Skiera B. Measuring consumers’ willingness to pay at the point of purchase. J. Marketing Res. (2002) 39(2):228–241CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zaltman G.How Customers Think: Essential Insights Into the Mind of the Market (2003) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.