Digital Piracy: A Competitive Analysis

References

• Arrow K., Nelson R. R. Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for inventions. Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity (1962) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) 609–625Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bagchi K., Kirs P., Cerveny R. Global software piracy: Can economic factors alone explain the trend? Comm. ACM (2006) 49(6):70–75Crossref, Google Scholar
• Besen S., Kirby S. Private copying, appropriability, and optimal copying royalties. J. Law Econom. (1989) 32:255–280Crossref, Google Scholar
• Business Software Alliance Piracy study. (2004) . http://www.bsa.orgGoogle Scholar
• Cabral L., Villas-Boas M. Bertrand supertraps. Management Sci. (2005) 51(4):599–614Link, Google Scholar
• Chen Y., Xie J. Cross-market network effect with asymmetric customer loyalty: Implications for competitive advantage. Marketing Sci. (2007) 26(1):52–66Link, Google Scholar
• Cheng H., Sims R., Teegen H. To purchase or to pirate software: An empirical study. J. Management Inform. Systems (1997) 13(4):49–60Crossref, Google Scholar
• Church J., Gandal N. Network effects, software provision, and standardization. J. Indust. Econom. (1992) 40:85–104Crossref, Google Scholar
• Conner K. Obtaining strategic advantage from being imitated: When can encouraging clone pay? Management Sci. (1995) 41(2):209–225Link, Google Scholar
• Conner K., Rumelt R. Software piracy: An analysis of protection strategies. Management Sci. (1991) 37(2):125–139Link, Google Scholar
• Dasgupta P., Maskin E. The existence of equilibrium in discontinuous economic games, I: Theory. Rev. Econom. Stud. (1986) 53(1):1–26Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fudenberg D., Tirole J. The fat-cat effect, the puppy-dog ploy, and the lean and hungry look. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1984) 74(2):361–366Google Scholar
• Givon M., Mahajan V., Muller E. Software piracy: Estimation of lost sales and the impact on software diffusion. J. Marketing (1995) 59(1):29–37Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gopal R., Sanders G. Preventive and deterrent controls for software piracy. J. Management Inform. Systems (1997) 13(4):29–47Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gu B., Mahajan V. How much anti-piracy effort is too much?—A study of the global software industry. (2005) . Working paper, University of Texas, AustinCrossref, Google Scholar
• Haruvy E., Mahajan V., Prasad A. The effect of piracy on the market penetration of subscription software. J. Bus. (2004) 77(2):S81–S106Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hui K., Png I. Piracy and the legitimate demand for recorded music. Contributions to Econom. Anal. Policy (2003) 2(1):1160–1184Google Scholar
• Hutzler C. China pumps up limp protections for trademarks; as Beijing stiffens penalties for the piracy of products, enforcement still is suspect. The Wall Street J. (2004) Dec 22):A.11Google Scholar
• Jain S., Srivastava J. An experimental and theoretical analysis of price matching refund policies. J. Marketing Res. (2000) 37:351–362Crossref, Google Scholar
• Johnson W. The economics of copying. J. Political Econom. (1985) 93(1):158–174Crossref, Google Scholar
• Katz M., Shapiro C. Network externalities, competition and compatibility. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1985) 75:424–440Google Scholar
• Li X. Cheap talk and bogus network externalities. Marketing Sci. (2005) 24(4):531–543Link, Google Scholar
• Liebowitz S. Copying and indirect appropriability: Photocopying of journals. J. Political Econom. (1985) 93:945–957Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lovelace H. Isn't tax time already frustrating enough? InformationWeek (2003) 9/29):96Google Scholar
• Mahajan V., Prasad A. How many pirates should a software firm tolerate? An analysis of piracy protection on the diffusion of software. Internat. J. Res. Marketing (2003) 20(4):337–352Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moul C. The day after tomorrow: Longer run issues in theatrical exhibition. Marketing Sci. (2006) 25(6):665–666Link, Google Scholar
• Murphy V. The enemy strikes back. Forbes (2003) 172,11(Nov 24):218Google Scholar
• Novos I., Waldman M. The effect of increasing copyright protection: An analytic approach. J. Political Econom. (1984) 92(2):236–246Crossref, Google Scholar
• Peitz M. A strategic approach to software protection: Comment. J. Econom. Management Strategy (2004) 13(2):371–374Crossref, Google Scholar
• Png I., Hirshleifer D. Price discrimination through offers to match price. J. Bus. (1987) 60(3):365–383Crossref, Google Scholar
• Png I., Wu C. Piracy helps. Asian Wall Street J. (1996) Feb. 9–10):10Google Scholar
• Purohit D. What should you do when your competitors send in the clones? Marketing Sci. (1994) 13(4):392–411Link, Google Scholar
• Shaffer G., Zhang J. Competitive coupon targeting. Marketing Sci. (1995) 14(4):395–416Link, Google Scholar
• Shy O., Thisse J. A strategic approach to software protection. J. Econom. Management Strategy (1999) 8(2):163–190Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sun B., Xie J., Cao H. Product strategy for innovators in markets with network effects. Marketing Sci. (2004) 23(2):243–254Link, Google Scholar
• Sundararajan A. Managing digital piracy: Pricing and protection. Inform. Systems Res. (2004) 15(3):287–308Link, Google Scholar
• Swinyard W., Rinne H., Kau A. The morality of software piracy: A cross-cultural analysis. J. Bus. Ethics (1990) 9(8):655–664Crossref, Google Scholar
• Takeyama L. The welfare implications of unauthorized reproduction of intellectual property in the presence of demand externalities. J. Indust. Econom. (1994) 42(2):155–166Crossref, Google Scholar
• Varian H. Copying and copyright. J. Econom. Perspectives (2005) 19(2):121–138Crossref, Google Scholar
• Williams S. Profits from piracy. (2002) September 26). http://www.salon.comGoogle Scholar
• Xie J., Sirbu M. Price competition and compatibility in the presence of positive demand effect. Management Sci. (1995) 41:909–926Link, Google Scholar
• Zettelmeyer F. Expanding to the Internet: Pricing and communications strategies when firms compete on multiple channels. J. Marketing Res. (2000) 37(3):292–308Crossref, Google Scholar