Try It, You Will Like It—Does Consumer Learning Lead to Competitive Price Promotions?

References

• Ailawadi K. L., Gedenk K., Lutzky C., Neslin S. A. Decomposition of the sales impact. J. Marketing Res. (2007) 44(August):450–467Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bass F. M., Givon M., Kalwani M. U., Reibstein D. J., Wright G. P. An investigation into the order of brand choice process. Marketing Sci. (1984) 3(3):267–297Link, Google Scholar
• Beggs A., Klemperer P. Multi-period competition with switching costs. Econometrica (1992) 60(3):651–666Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bell D. R., Chiang J., Padmanabhan V. The decomposition of promotional response: An empirical generalization. Marketing Sci. (1999) 18(4):504–526Link, Google Scholar
• Bell D. R., Iyer G., Padmanabhan V. Price competition under stockpiling and flexible consumption. J. Marketing Res. (2002) 39(Aug.):292–303Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blattberg R. C., Neslin S. A.Sales Promotion: Concepts, Methods, and Strategy (1990) (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
• Blattberg R. C., Sen S. K. Market segments and stochastic brand choice models. J. Marketing Res. (1976) 13(Feb.):34–45Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blattberg R. C., Wisniewski K. J. Price-induced patterns of competition. Marketing Sci. (1989) 8(4):291–309Link, Google Scholar
• Che H., Sudhir K., Seetharaman P. B. Bounded rationality in pricing under state-dependent demand: Do firms look ahead, and if so, how far? J. Marketing Res. (2007) 44(August):434–449Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chiang J. A simultaneous approach to the whether, what, and how much to buy questions. Marketing Sci. (1991) 10(3):297–315Link, Google Scholar
• Chintagunta P. K. Investigating purchase incidence, brand choice, and purchase quantity decisions of households. Marketing Sci. (1993) 12(2):184–208Link, Google Scholar
• Chintagunta P. K., Vilcassim N. J. An empirical investigation of advertising strategies in a dynamic duopoly. Management Sci. (1992) 38(9):1230–1244Link, Google Scholar
• Clarke D. E. Econometric measurement of the duration of advertising effects on sales. J. Marketing Res. (1976) 18(Nov.):345–387Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feller W.An Introduction to Probability Theory and Its Applications (1968) (Wiley and Sons, New York) Google Scholar
• Frank R. E. Brand choice as a probability process. J. Bus. (1962) 34:43–56Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gedenk K., Neslin S. A. The role of retail promotion in determining future brand loyalty: Its effect on purchase event feedback. J. Retailing (1999) 75(4):433–459Crossref, Google Scholar
• Givon M., Horsky D. Market share models as approximations of aggregated heterogeneous brand choice behavior. Management Sci. (1978) 24(13):1404–1416Link, Google Scholar
• Givon M., Horsky D. Application of a composite stochastic model of brand choice. J. Marketing Res. (1979) 16(May):258–268Crossref, Google Scholar
• Givon M., Horsky D. Homogeneity and heterogeneity in stochastic models of brand choice behavior. Internat. J. Res. Marketing (1985) 2:263–272Crossref, Google Scholar
• Givon M., Horsky D. Untangling the effects of purchase reinforcement and advertising carryover. Marketing Sci. (1990) 9(2):171–187Link, Google Scholar
• Guadagni P. M., Little J. D. C. A logit model of brand choice calibrated on scanner data. Marketing Sci. (1983) 2(3):203–238Link, Google Scholar
• Gupta S. Impact of price promotions on when, what, and how much to buy. J. Marketing Res. (1988) 25(Nov.):342–356Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heckman J., Rosen S. Heterogeneity and state dependence. Studies in Labor Markets (1981) (University of Chicago Press, Chicago) 91–139Google Scholar
• Horsky D. An empirical analysis of the optimal advertising policy. Management Sci. (1977) 23(10):1037–1049Link, Google Scholar
• Horsky D., Misra S., Nelson P. Observed and unobserved preference heterogeneity in brand choice models. Marketing Sci. (2006) 25(4):322–335Link, Google Scholar
• Jeuland A. P., Bass F. M., Wright G. P. A multibrand stochastic model compounding heterogeneous. Erlang timing and multinomial choice process. Oper. Res. (1980) 28(2):255–277Link, Google Scholar
• Jones J. M., Zufryden F. S. Relating deal purchases and consumer characteristics to repeat purchase probability. J. Market Res. Soc. (1981) 23:84–99Google Scholar
• Kahn B. E., Louie T. A. Effects of retraction of price promotions on brand choice behavior for variety-seeking and last-purchase-loyal consumers. J. Marketing Res. (1990) 27(3):279–289Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahn B. E., Raju J. S. Effects of price promotions on variety seeking and reinforcement behavior. Marketing Sci. (1991) 19(4):316–337Link, Google Scholar
• Keane P. M. Modeling heterogeneity at state dependence in consumer choice behavior. J. Bus. Econom. Stud. (1997) 15(3):310–327Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kopalle P. K., Neslin S. A. The economic viability of frequency reward programs in a strategic competitive environment. Rev. Marketing Sci. (2003) 1Google Scholar
• Kopalle P. K., Mela C. F., Marsh L. The dynamic effect of discounting on sales: Empirical analysis and normative implications. Marketing Sci. (1999) 18(3):317–332Link, Google Scholar
• Kopalle P. K., Rao A. G., Assunção J. L. Asymmetric reference price effects and dynamic pricing policies. Marketing Sci. (1996) 15(1):60–85Link, Google Scholar
• Lal R. Price promotions: Limiting competitive encroachment. Marketing Sci. (1990) 9(2):247–262Link, Google Scholar
• Little J. D. C. Aggregate advertising models: The state of the art. Oper. Res. (1979) 27(4):629–667Link, Google Scholar
• Massy W. F., Montgomery D. B., Morrison D. G.Stochastic Models of Buyer Behavior (1970) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Morrison D. G. Testing brand switching models. J. Marketing Res. (1966) 3(Nov.):401–409Crossref, Google Scholar
• Narasimhan C. Competitive promotional strategies. J. Bus. (1988) 61(Oct.):427–450Crossref, Google Scholar
• Narasimhan C., Wilcox R. T. Private labels and the channel relationship: A cross category analysis. J. Bus. (1998) 71(4):573–600Crossref, Google Scholar
• Neslin S. A., Weitz B. A., Wensley R. Sales promotion. Handbook of Marketing (2002) (Sage Publications, London) 310–339Crossref, Google Scholar
• Neslin S. A., Shoemaker R. W. An alternative explanation for lower repeat rates after promotion purchases. J. Marketing Res. (1989) 26(2):205–213Crossref, Google Scholar
• Raju J. S., Srinivasan V., Lal R. The effects of brand loyalty on competitive price promotional strategies. Management Sci. (1990) 36(3):276–304Link, Google Scholar
• Rao R. C. Pricing and promotions in asymmetric duopolies. Marketing Sci. (1991) 10(2):131–144Link, Google Scholar
• Scott Morton F., Zettelmeyer F. The strategic positioning of store brands in retailer-manufacturer negotiations. Rev. Indust. Organ. (2004) 24:161–194Crossref, Google Scholar
• Seetharaman P. B. Modeling multiple sources of state dependence in random utility models: A distributed lag approach. Marketing Sci. (2004) 23(2):263–271Link, Google Scholar
• Seetharaman P. B., Ainslie A., Chintagunta P. K. Investigating household state dependence effects across categories. J. Marketing Res. (1999) 36(Nov.):488–500Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shilony Y. Mixed pricing in an oligopoly. J. Econom. Theory (1977) 14(April):373–388Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shoemaker R. W., Shoaf F. A. Repeat rules of deal purchasing? J. Advertising Res. (1977) 17(2):47–53Google Scholar
• van Heerde H. J., Leeflang P. S. H., Wittink D. R. Decomposing the sales promotion bump with store data. Marketing Sci. (2004) 23(3):317–334Link, Google Scholar
• Varian H. R. A model of sales. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1980) 70(Sept.):651–659Google Scholar
• Villas-Boas J. M. Consumer learning, brand loyalty and competition. Marketing Sci. (2004) 23(1):136–145Link, Google Scholar
• Zhang Z. J., Krishna A., Dahr S. K. The optimal choice of promotional vehicles: Front-loaded or rear-loaded incentives? Management Sci. (2000) 46(3):348–362Link, Google Scholar