The Option Value of Returns: Theory and Empirical Evidence

References

• Alba J. W., Broniarczyk S., Shimp T., Urbany J. E. The influence of prior beliefs, frequency cues, and magnitude cues on consumers' perceptions of comparative price data. J. Consumer Res. (1994) 21(2):219–235Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anderson E. T., Fitzsimons G. J., Simester D. Measuring and mitigating the costs of stockouts. Management Sci. (2006) 52(11):1751–1763Link, Google Scholar
• Anderson E. T., Hansen K., Simester D. I., Wang L. K. How price affects returns: The perceived value and incremental customer effects. (2009) . Working paper, Kellogg School of Management, Northwestern University, Evanston, ILGoogle Scholar
• Blanchard D. Moving forward in reverse. Logist. Today (2005) 46(7):1Google Scholar
• Blattberg R. C., Briesch R., Fox E. J. How promotions work. Marketing Sci. (1995) 14(3):G122–G132Link, Google Scholar
• Che Y.-K. Customer return policies for experience goods. J. Indust. Econom. (1996) 44(1):17–24Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davis S., Gerstner E., Hagerty M. Money back guarantees in retailing: Matching products to consumer tastes. J. Retailing (1995) 71(1):7–22Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davis S., Hagerty M., Gerstner E. Return policies and the optimal level of hassle. J. Econom. Bus. (1998) 50:445–460Crossref, Google Scholar
• Emmons H., Gilbert S. M. The role of returns policies in pricing and inventory decisions for catalogue goods. Management Sci. (1998) 44(2):276–283Link, Google Scholar
• Heiman A., McWilliams B., Zilberman D. Demonstrations and money-back guarantees: Market mechanisms to reduce uncertainty. J. Bus. Res. (2001) 54:71–84Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hess J. D., Mayhew G. E. Modeling merchandise returns in direct marketing. J. Direct Marketing (1997) 11(2):20–35Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ho T. H., Tang C. S. Introduction to the special issue on marketing and operations management interfaces and coordination. Management Sci. (2004) 50(4):429–430Link, Google Scholar
• Jedidi K., Mela C. F., Gupta S. Managing advertising and promotion for long-run profitability. Marketing Sci. (1999) 18(1):1–22Link, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D., Tversky A. Choices, values and frames. Amer. Psychologist (1984) 39:341–350Crossref, Google Scholar
• Karmarkar U. S. Integrative research in marketing and operations management. J. Marketing Res. (1996) 33(2):125–133Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kiesmüller G. P., van der Laan E. A. An inventory model with dependent product demands and returns. Internat. J. Production Econom. (2001) 72(1):73–87Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kulp S. C., Lee H. L., Ofek E. Manufacturer benefits from information integration with retail customers. Management Sci. (2004) 50(4):431–444Link, Google Scholar
• Lichtenstein D. R., Bearden W. O. Contextual influence on perceptions of merchant-supplied reference prices. J. Consumer Res. (1989) 16:55–66Crossref, Google Scholar
• Merrick A., Brat I. Taking back that blender gets harder—Sears is the latest retailer to tighten returns policy; how to avoid being refused. Wall Street Journal (2005) December 15):D1Google Scholar
• Mohl B. For duo, basement ban is no bargain. Boston Globe (2003) July 13):C1Google Scholar
• Moorthy S., Srinivasan K. Signaling quality with a money-back guarantee: The role of transaction costs. Marketing Sci. (1995) 14(4):442–466Link, Google Scholar
• Padmanabhan V., Png I. P. L. Manufacturer's returns policies and retail competition. Marketing Sci. (1997) 16(1):81–94Link, Google Scholar
• Pasternack B. A. Optimal pricing and return policies for perishable commodities. Marketing Sci. (1985) 4(2):166–176Link, Google Scholar
• Rogers D. S., Tibben-Lembke R. S. An examination of reverse logistics practices. J. Bus. Logist. (2001) 22(2):129–248Crossref, Google Scholar
• Savaskan R. C., Bhattacharya S., Van Wassenhove L. N. Closed-loop supply chain models with product remanufacturing. Management Sci. (2004) 50(2):239–252Link, Google Scholar
• Shulman J., Coughlan A., Savaskan C. Optimal restocking fees and information provision in an integrated demand-supply model of product returns. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management (2009) . ForthcomingLink, Google Scholar
• Tellis G. J. The price sensitivity of competitive demand: A meta-analysis of sales response models. J. Marketing Res. (1988) 15(3):331–341Crossref, Google Scholar
• Walker A. Retailers are getting tough on merchandise returns; trying to reduce costly fraud. Baltimore Sun (2004) December 26):A10Google Scholar