Website Morphing

References

• Allinson C. W., Hayes J. The cognitive style index: A measure of intuition-analysis for organizational research. J. Management Stud. (1996) 33(1):119–135Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ansari A., Mela C. F. E-customization. J. Marketing Res. (2003) 40(2):131–145Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bergkvist L., Rossiter J. R. The predictive validity of multiple-item versus single-item measures of the same constructs. J. Marketing Res. (2007) 64(2):175–184Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bertsimas D., Niño-Mora J. Conservation laws, extended polymatroids and multi-armed bandit problems. Math. Oper. Res. (1996) 21(2):257–306Link, Google Scholar
• Bidel S. L. L., Piat F., Artières T., Gallinari P., Macskassy S. A., Wilkinson R., Goker A., Bauer M. Statistical machine learning for tracking hypermedia user behavior. UM'03—9th Internat. Conf. User Modeling: Second Workshop on Machine Learn., Inform. Retrieval and User Model. (2003) Johnstown, PA:48–65Google Scholar
• Braun M., Urban G. L., Lee C., Hauser J. R. Matching website characteristics to cognitive styles. (2008) . Working paper, MIT Sloan School of Management, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
• Chickering D. M., Paek T. Personalizing influence diagrams: Applying online learning strategies to dialogue management. User Model. User-Adapted Interaction (2007) 17(1–2):71–91Crossref, Google Scholar
• Conati C., Gertner A., VanLehn K. Using Bayesian networks to manage uncertainty in student modeling. User Model. User-Adapted Interaction (2002) 12(4):371–417Crossref, Google Scholar
• Drolet A. L., Morrison D. G. Do we really need multiple-item measures in service research? J. Service Res. (2001) 3(3):196–204Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dusonchet F., Hongler M.-O. Priority index heuristic for multi-armed bandit problems with set-up costs and/or set-up time delays. Internat. J. Comput. Integrated Manufacturing (2006) 19(3):210–219Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frederick S. Cognitive reflection and decision making. J. Econom. Perspectives (2005) 19(4):25–42Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frias-Martinez E., Chen S. Y., Liu X. Automatic cognitive style identification of digital library users for personalization. J. Amer. Soc. Inform. Sci. Tech. (2007) 58(2):237–251Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gittins J. C. Bandit processes and dynamic allocation indices. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B (1979) 41(2):148–177plus commentaryGoogle Scholar
• Gittins J. C.Allocation Indices for Multi-Armed Bandits (1989) (John Wiley & Sons, London) Google Scholar
• Harvey O. J., Hunt D. E., Schroder H. M.Conceptual Systems and Personality Organization (1961) (John Wiley & Sons, New York) Google Scholar
• Hauser J. R. Testing the accuracy, usefulness and significance of probabilistic models: An information theoretic approach. Oper. Res. (1978) 26(3):406–421Link, Google Scholar
• Hauser J. R., Toubia O. The impact of utility balance and endogeneity in conjoint analysis. Marketing Sci. (2005) 24(3):498–507Link, Google Scholar
• Hayes J., Allinson C. W. Cognitive style and the theory and practice of individual and collective learning in organizations. Human Relations (1998) 31(7):847–871Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hofstede G. National cultures in four dimensions. Internat. Stud. Management Organ. (1983) 13:46–74Google Scholar
• Hofstede G.Culture's Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values (1984) (Sage, Beverly Hills, CA) Google Scholar
• Hofstede G.Culture's Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions and Organizations Across Nations (2001) 2nd ed.(Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA) Google Scholar
• Hughes M. A., Garrett D. E. Intercoder reliability estimation approaches in marketing: A generalizability theory framework for quantitative data. J. Marketing Res. (1990) 27(May):185–195Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jamieson L. F., Bass F. M. Adjusting stated intention measures to predict trial purchase of new products: A comparison of models and methods. J. Marketing Res. (1989) 26(August):336–345Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jun T. A survey on the bandit problem with switching costs. de Economist (2004) 152(4):513–541Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kalwani M. U., Silk A. J. On the reliability and predictive validity of purchase intention measures. Marketing Sci. (1982) 1(3):243–286Link, Google Scholar
• Kirton M. J.Adaption-Innovation Inventory (KAI) Manual (1987) (Occupational Research Centre, Hatfield, UK) Google Scholar
• Kopfstein D. Risk-taking behavior and cognitive style. Child Development (1973) 44(1):190–192Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krishnamurthy V., Mickova J. Finite dimensional algorithms for the hidden Markov model multi-armed bandit problem. IEEE Internat. Conf. Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (1999) 5(Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Washington, D.C.) 2865–2868Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liechty J., Peters R., Wedel M. Global and local covert visual attention: Evidence from a Bayesian hidden Markov model. Psychometrika (2003) 68(4):519–541Crossref, Google Scholar
• Magoulas G. D., Papanikolaou K. A., Grigoriadou M. Neuro-fuzzy synergism for planning the content in a Web-based course. Informatica (2001) 25:39–48Google Scholar
• Mainemelis C., Boyatzis R., Kolb D. A. Learning styles and adaptive flexibility: Testing experiential learning theory. Management Learn. (2002) 31(1):5–33Crossref, Google Scholar
• Montgomery A. L., Li S., Srinivasan K., Liechty J. Modeling online browsing and path analysis using clickstream data. Marketing Sci. (2004) 23(4):579–585Link, Google Scholar
• Montoya R., Netzer O., Jedidi K. Dynamic marketing resource allocation for long-term profitability: A pharmaceutical application. (2008) . Working paper, Columbia University, New YorkGoogle Scholar
• Morrison D. G. Purchase intentions and purchase behavior. J. Marketing (1979) 43(Spring):65–74Crossref, Google Scholar
• Morwitz V. G., Johnson E., Schmittlein D. Does measuring intent change behavior? J. Consumer Res. (1993) 20(June):46–61Crossref, Google Scholar
• Netzer O., Lattin J. M., Srinivasan V. A hidden Markov model of customer relationship dynamics. Marketing Sci. (2008) 27(2):185–204Link, Google Scholar
• Paivio A.Imagery and Verbal Processes (1971) (Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York) Google Scholar
• Perreault W. D., Leigh L. E. Reliability of nominal data based on qualitative judgments. J. Marketing Res. (1989) 26(May):135–148Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rhoads B., Urban G. L., Sultan F. Building customer trust through adaptive site design. MSI Conference, Yale University, New Haven, CT, December 11; and abstracted in Urban, Glen 2005. Don't Just Relate—Advocate (2004) (Pearson Education, Upper Saddle River, NJ) 146–148Google Scholar
• Riding R. J., Calvey I. The assessment of verbal-imagery learning styles and their effect on the recall of concrete and abstract prose passages by eleven year old children. British J. Psych. (1981) 72(1):59–64Crossref, Google Scholar
• Riding R. J., Cheema I. Cognitive styles: An overview and integration. Educational Psych. (1991) 11(3&4):193–215Crossref, Google Scholar
• Riding R. J., Rayner S.Cognitive Styles and Learning Strategies: Understanding Style Differences in Learning and Behavior (1998) (David Fulton Publishers, London) Google Scholar
• Riding R. J., Taylor E. M. Imagery performance and prose comprehension in seven-year-old children. Educational Stud. (1976) 2(1):21–27Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rogers E. M.The Diffusion of Innovations (1962) (The Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Rogers E. M., Stanfield J. D., Bass F. M., King C. W., Pessimer E. A. Adoption and diffusion of new products: Emerging generalizations and hypotheses. Applications of the Sciences in Marketing Management (1968) (John Wiley & Sons, New York) 227–250Google Scholar
• Rust R. T., Cooil B. Reliability measures for qualitative data: Theory and implications. J. Marketing Res. (1994) 31(February):1–14Crossref, Google Scholar
• Santally M. I., Alain S. Personalisation in Web-based learning environments. J. Distance Ed. Tech. (2006) 4(4):15–35Crossref, Google Scholar
• Siegelman E. Reflective and impulsive observing behavior. Child Development (1969) 40(4):1213–1222Crossref, Google Scholar
• Steenkamp J.-B.E.M., Baumgartner H. Assessing measurement invariance in cross-national consumer research. J. Consumer Res. (1998) 25(1):78–90Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tarpin-Bernard F., Habieb-Mammar F. Modeling elementary cognitive abilities for adaptive hypermedia presentation. User Modeling User-Adapted Interaction (2005) 15(5):459–495Crossref, Google Scholar
• Train K.Discrete Choice Methods with Simulations (2003) (University Press, Cambridge, UK) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Trompenaars F., Hampden-Turner C.Riding the Waves of Culture: Understanding Cultural Diversity in Business (1997) (Nicholas Brealey, London) Google Scholar
• Tsitsiklis J. N. A short proof of the Gittins index theorem. Ann. Appl. Probab. (1994) 4(1):194–199Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tybout A. M., Hauser J. R. A marketing audit using a conceptual model of consumer behavior: Application and evaluation. J. Marketing (1981) 45(3):82–101Crossref, Google Scholar
• Urban G. L., Hauser J. R. “Listening-in” to find and explore new combinations of customer needs. J. Marketing (2004) 68(April):72–87Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vermorel J., Mohri M., Gama J., Camacho R., Brazdil P., Jorge A., Torgo L. Multi-armed bandit algorithms and empirical evaluation. Machine Learning: ECML 2005—Proc. Eur. Conf. Machine Learn (2005) 3720PortoOctober 3–7Portugal(Springer, Berlin) 437–448Lecture Notes in Computer ScienceCrossref, Google Scholar
• von Hippel E.Sources of Innovation (1988) (Oxford University Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Weber R. On the Gittins index for multi-armed bandits. Ann. Appl. Probab. (1992) 2(4):1024–1033Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wernerfelt B. Efficient marketing communications: Helping the customer learn. J. Marketing Res. (1996) 23(2):239–243Crossref, Google Scholar
• Whittle P. Foreword to Multi-Armed Bandit Allocation Indices, by J. C. Gittins. (1989) (John Wiley & Sons, London) Google Scholar
• Witkin H. A., Moore C., Goodenough D., Cox P. Field-dependent and field-independent cognitive styles and their educational implications. Rev. Educational Res. (1977) 47(1):1–64Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wright P. The cognitive processes mediating acceptance of advertising. J. Marketing Res. (1973) 10(February):53–62Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yudelson M. V., Medvedeva O. P., Crowley R. S. A multifactor approach to student model evaluation. User Model. User-Adapted Interaction (2008) 18(4):349–382Crossref, Google Scholar