Understanding the Role of Trade-Ins in Durable Goods Markets: Theory and Evidence

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.1080.0461

References

  • Ackere A. V., Reyniers D. J. Trade-ins and introductory offers in a monopoly. RAND J. Econom. (1995) 26(1):58–74CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Adda J., Cooper R. Balladurette and Juppette: A discrete analysis of scrapping subsidies. J. Political Econom. (2000) 108(4):778–806CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Akerlof G. The market for “lemons”: Quality, uncertainty and market mechanism. Quart. J. Econom. (1970) 84(3):488–500CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Anderson S., Ginsburgh V. Price discrimination via second-hand markets. Eur. Econom. Rev. (1994) 38(1):23–44CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ayers I., Siegelman P. Race and gender discrimination in bargaining for a new car. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1995) 85:304–321Google Scholar
  • Balachander S., Srinivasan K. Selection of product line qualities and prices to signal competitive advantage. Management Sci. (1994) 40(7):824–841LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bruce N., Desai P., Staelin R. The better they are, the more they give: Trade promotions of consumer durables. J. Marketing Res. (2005) 42(1):54–66CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bulow J. Durable goods monopolists. J. Political Econom. (1982) 90(2):729–749CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Coase R. Durability and monopoly. J. Law Econom. (1972) 15(10):143–149CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Copeland A., Dunn W., Hall G. Prices, production and inventories over the automotive model year. (2005) . NBER Working Paper 11257, NBER, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  • Desai P., Purohit D. Leasing and selling: Optimal marketing strategies for a durable goods firm. Management Sci. (1998) 44(11):S19–S34LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Desai P., Purohit D. Competition in durable goods market: The strategic consequences of leasing and selling. Marketing Sci. (1999) 18(1):42–58LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Desai P., Koenigsberg O., Purohit D. Strategic decentralization and channel coordination. Quant. Marketing Econom. (2004) 2(1):5–22CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fudenberg D., Tirole J. Upgrades, trade-ins and buybacks. RAND J. Econom. (1998) 29(2):235–258CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gavazza A. Essays in political economy and industrial organization. (2005) . Unpublished doctoral dissertation, New York University, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  • Gilligan T. W. Lemons and leases in the used business aircraft market. J. Political Econom. (2004) 112(5):1157–1180CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Goldberg P. K. Dealer price discrimination in new car purchases: Evidence from the consumer expenditure survey. J. Political Econom. (1996) 104(3):622–654CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hendel I., Lizzeri A. Adverse selection in durable goods markets. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1999a) 89(5):1095–1115CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hendel I., Lizzeri A. Interfering with secondary markets. RAND J. Econom. (1999b) 30(1):1–21CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Huang S., Yang Y., Anderson K. A theory of finitely durable goods monopoly with used-goods markets and transaction costs. Management Sci. (2001) 47(11):1515–1532LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Konishi H., Sandfort M. T. Existence of stationary equilibrium in the markets for new and used durable goods. J. Econom. Dynam. Control (2002) 26(6):1029–1052CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Levinthal D., Purohit D. A theory of economic obsolescence. Marketing Sci. (1989) 8(1):35–56LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Mussa M., Rosen S. Monopoly and product quality. J. Econom. Theory (1978) 18(2):301–317CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Porter R., Sattler P. Patterns of trade in the market for used durables: Theory and evidence. (1999) . NBER Working Paper 7149, NBER, Cambridge, MACrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Purohit D. Dual distribution channels: The competition between rental agencies and dealers. Marketing Sci. (1997) 16(3):228–245LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Rust J. Stationary equilibrium in a market for durable assets. Econometrica (1985) 53(4):783–805CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shapiro C. Aftermarkets, and consumer welfare: Making sense of Kodak. Anti-Trust Law J. (1995) 63:483–511Google Scholar
  • Stolyarov D. Turnover of used durables in stationary equilibrium: Are older goods traded more? J. Political Econom. (2002) 110(6):1390–1413CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tellis G. J., Wernerfelt B. Competitive price and quality under asymmetric information. Marketing Sci. (1987) 6(3):240–253LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Waldman M. Durable goods theory for real world markets. J. Econom. Perspectives (2003) 17(1):131–154CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.