Cross-National Logo Evaluation Analysis: An Individual-Level Approach

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.1080.0462

References

  • Adams R. B., Gordon H. L., Baird A. A., Ambady N., Kleck R. E. Effects of gaze on amygdala sensitivity to anger and fear faces. Science (2003) 300(5625):1536CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Alashban A. A., Hayes L. A., Zinkhan G. M., Balazs A. L. International brand-name standardization/adaptation: Antecedents and consequences. J. Internat. Marketing (2002) 10(3):22–48CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Anand P., Sternthal B. Perceptual fluency and affect without recognition. Memory Cognition (1991) 19(3):293–300CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Arnold S. F.Mathematical Statistics (1990) (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Arrindell W. A., Eisemann M., Tian P., Oei S., Caballo V. E., Sanavio E., Sica C., et al. Phobic anxiety in 11 nations, Part II. Hofstede's dimensions of national cultures predict national-level variations. Personality Individual Differences (2004) 37:627–643CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baumgartner H., Steenkamp J.-B. E. M. Multi-group latent variable models for varying numbers of items and factors with cross-national and longitudinal applications. Marketing Lett. (1998) 9(1):21–35CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baumgartner H., Steenkamp J.-B. E. M. Response styles in marketing research: A cross-national investigation. J. Marketing Res. (2001) 38(2):143–156CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Berlyne D. E.Studies in the New Experimental Aesthetics: Steps Toward an Objective Psychology of Aesthetic Appreciation (1974) (Hemisphere Publishing Corporation, Washington, DC) Google Scholar
  • Chib S. Marginal likelihood from the Gibbs output. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. (1995) 90(432):1313–1321CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Colman A. M., Wober J. M., Norris C. E. Sight bites: A study of viewers' impressions of corporate logos in the communications industry. J. Market Res. Soc. (1995) 37(4):405–415CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • DeSarbo W. S., Di Benedetto C. A., Kamel J., Song M. Identifying sources of heterogeneity for empirically deriving strategic types: A constrained finite-mixture structural-equation methodology. Management Sci. (2006) 52(6):909–924LinkGoogle Scholar
  • DeShon R. P. A cautionary note on measurement error corrections in structural equation models. Psych. Methods (1998) 3(4):412–423CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Diebolt J., Robert C. P. Estimation of finite mixture distributions through Bayesian sampling. J. Royal Statist. Soc. Ser. B (1994) 56(2):363–375Google Scholar
  • Edell J. A., Staelin R. The information processing of pictures in print advertisements. J. Consumer Res. (1983) 10(1):45–61CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ekman P. Introduction to the third edition. The Expression of the Emotions in Man and Animals, 3rd ed. with introduction, afterwords, and commentaries (1998) (HarperCollins, London) xxi–xxxviGoogle Scholar
  • Ellis H. C., Parente F. J., Shumate E. C. Meaningfulness, perceptual grouping, and organization in recognition memory. J. Experiment. Psych. (1974) 102(2):308–313CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Erdem T., Zhao Y., Valenzuela A. Performance of store brands: A cross-country analysis of consumer store-brand preferences, perceptions, and risk. J. Marketing Res. (2004) 41(1):86–100CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Frühwirth-Schnatter S.Finite Mixture and Markov Switching Models (2006) (Springer, New York) Google Scholar
  • Gelman A., Pardoe I. Bayesian measures of explained variance and pooling in multilevel (hierarchical) models. Technometrics (2006) 48(2):241–251CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Geweke J., Bernardo J. M., Berger J. O., Dawid A. P., Smith A. F. M. Evaluating the accuracy of sampling-based approaches to the calculation of posterior moments. Bayesian Statistics (1992) (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK) 169–193Google Scholar
  • Grewal R., Cote J. A., Baumgartner H. Multicollinearity and measurement error in structural equation models: Implications for theory testing. Marketing Sci. (2004) 23(4):519–529LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gürhan-Canli Z., Maheswaran D. Cultural variations in country-of-origin effects. J. Marketing Res. (2000) 37(3):309–317CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Henderson P. W., Cote J. A. Guidelines for selecting or modifying logos. J. Marketing (1998) 62(2):14–30CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Henderson P. W., Lafontaine F. Concentration measures and the meaning of marketing stimuli. (1996) . Working paper, Washington State University, Richland, WAGoogle Scholar
  • Henderson P. W., Giese J. L., Cote J. A. Impression management using typeface design. J. Marketing (2004) 68(4):60–72CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Henderson P. W., Cote J. A., Leong S. M., Schmitt B. Building strong brands in Asia: Selecting the visual components of image to maximize brand strength. Internat. J. Res. Marketing (2003) 20(4):297–313CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hofstede G. National cultures in four dimensions: A research-based theory of cultural differences among nations. Internat. Stud. Management Organ. (1983) 13(1–2):46–74Google Scholar
  • Hofstede G.Culture's Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions and Organizations across Nations (2001) (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA) Google Scholar
  • Jedidi K., Jagpal H. S., DeSarbo W. S. Finite-mixture structural equation models for response-based segmentation and unobserved heterogeneity. Marketing Sci. (1997) 16(1):39–59LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Jones D. An evolutionary perspective on physical attractiveness. Evolutionary Anthropology (1996) 5(3):97–109CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kapferer J. N. How global are global brands? ESOMAR Conf. Proc., The Challenge of Branding Today and in the Future (1992) (ESOMAR Publications, Brussels) 199–215Google Scholar
  • Kohli C., Suri R., Thakor M. Creating effective logos: Insights from theory and practice. Bus. Horizons (2002) 45(3):58–64CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kuwayama Y.Trade Marks and Symbols, Vol. 2: Symbolic Design (1973) (Van Nostrand Reinhold Co., New York) Google Scholar
  • Lenk P. J., DeSarbo W. S. Bayesian inference for finite mixtures of generalized linear models with random effects. Psychometrika (2000) 65(1):93–119CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lutz K. A., Lutz R. J. Effects of interactive imagery on learning: Application to advertising. J. Applied Psych. (1977) 62(4):493–498CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Martindale C., Moore E., West A. Relationship of preference judgments to typicality, novelty and mere exposure. Empirical Stud. Arts (1988) 6(1):79–96CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Methven N., McGurran A. No-go logo: The olympic design fiasco. Daily Mirror (2007) London):7Google Scholar
  • Orians G. H., Heerwagen J. H., Barkow J. H., Cosmides L., Tooby J. Evolved responses to landscape. The Adapted Mind: Evolutionary Psychology and the Generation of Culture (1992) (Oxford University Press, New York) 555–579Google Scholar
  • Orth U. R., Malkewitz K. Holistic package design and consumer brand impressions. J. Marketing (2008) 72(May):64–81CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Perfetti C., Liu Y., Tan L. H. The lexical constituency model: Some implications of research on Chinese for general theories of reading. Psych. Rev. (2005) 112(1):43–59CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pittard N., Ewing M., Jevons C. Aesthetic theory and logo design: Examining consumer response to proportion across cultures. Internat. Marketing Rev. (2007) 24(4):457–473CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Raftery A. E., Lewis S., Bernardo J. M., Berger J. O., Dawid A. P., Smith A. F. M. How many iterations in the Gibbs sampler? Bayesian Statistics (1992) (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK) 763–774Google Scholar
  • Raymond J. E., Fenske M. J., Tavassoli N. T. Selective attention determines emotional responses to novel visual stimuli. Psych. Sci. (2003) 14(6):537–542CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Richardson S., Green P. J. On Bayesian analysis of mixtures with an unknown number of components. J. Royal Statist. Soc. Ser. B (1997) 59(4):731–792CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rodewald H. K., Bosma L. F. Information transmission in brief exposures as a function of association value. Perceptual Motor Skill (1972) 34(2):420–422CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rossi P. E., Allenby G. M. Bayesian statistics and marketing. Marketing Sci. (2003) 22(3):304–328LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Rossi P. E., Allenby G. M., McCulloch R.Bayesian Statistics and Marketing (2005) (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Seifert L. S. Pictures as a means of conveying information. J. General Psych. (1992) 119(3):279–287CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shinar D., Dewar R. E., Summala H., Zakowska L. Traffic sign symbol comprehension: A cross-cultural study. Ergonomics (2003) 46(15):1549–1565CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Steenkamp J.-B. E. M., Baumgartner H. Assessing measurement invariance in cross-national consumer research. J. Consumer Res. (1998) 25(1):78–90CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ter Hofstede F., Steenkamp J.-B. E. M., Wedel M. International market segmentation based on consumer-product relations. J. Marketing Res. (1999) 36(February):1–17CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zajonc R. B. Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1968) 9(2, Part 2):1–27CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zhang Y., Feick L., Price L. J. The impact of self-construal on aesthetic preference for angular versus rounded shapes. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. (2006) 32(6):794–805CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.