Return on Roller Coasters: A Model to Guide Investments in Theme Park Attractions

References

• Abraham M. M., Lodish L. M. Promoter: An automated promotion evaluation system. Marketing Sci. (1987) 6(2):101–123Link, Google Scholar
• Adams W. J., Yellen J. L. Commodity bundling and the burden of monopoly. Quart. J. Econom. (1976) 90(3):475–498Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ahmadi R. H. Managing capacity and flow at theme parks. Oper. Res. (1997) 45(1):1–13Link, Google Scholar
• Ambler T.Marketing and the Bottom Line (2003) (Financial Times, Prentice Hall, London) Google Scholar
• Aragon E., Kleiner B. H. Hiring practices in the amusement park industry. Management Res. News (2003) 26(2–4):20–26Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bodapati A. V., Gupta S. The recoverability of segmentation structure from store-level aggregate data. J. Marketing Res. (2004) 41(3):351–364Crossref, Google Scholar
• Broniarczyk S. M., Hoyer W. D., McAlister L. Consumers' perceptions of the assortment offered in a grocery category: The impact of item reduction. J. Marketing Res. (1998) 35(May):166–176Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brown C. L., Krishna A. The skeptical shopper: A meta-cognitive account for the effects of default options on choice. J. Consumer Res. (2004) 32(3):529–539Crossref, Google Scholar
• BusinessWeek The Batman and Robin of Six Flags. (2006) May 8). http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/06_19/b3983081.htmGoogle Scholar
• Chandrashekaran M., Sinha R. K. Isolating the determinants of innovativeness: A Split-Population Tobit (SPOT) duration model of timing and volume of first and repeat purchase. J. Marketing Res. (1995) 32(4):444–456Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen M. A., Eliashberg J., Ho T. H. An anatomy of a decision-support system for developing and launching line extensions. J. Marketing Res. (1997) 34(1):117–129Crossref, Google Scholar
• Darnell A. C., Johnson P. S. Repeat visits to attractions: A preliminary economic analysis. Tourism Management (2001) 22(2):119–126Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davies R. B. Hypothesis testing when a nuisance parameter is present only under the alternative. Biometrika (1987) 74(1):33–43Google Scholar
• Dietvorst A. G. J., Ashworth G. J., Dietvorst A. G. J. Tourist behavior and the importance of time-space analysis. Tourism and Spatial Transformations: Implications for Policy and Planning (1995) (CAB International, Wallingford, UK) 163–181Google Scholar
• Eliashberg J., Elberse A., Leenders M. A. A. M. The motion picture industry: Critical issues in practice, current research, and new research directions. Marketing Sci. (2006) 25(6):638–661Link, Google Scholar
• Foekens E. W., Leeflang P. S. H., Wittink D. R. Varying parameter models to accommodate dynamic promotion effects. J. Econometrics (1999) 89(1–2):249–268Crossref, Google Scholar
• Formica S., Olsen M. D. Trends in the amusement park industry. Internat. J. Contemporary Hospitality Management (1998) 10(7):297–308Crossref, Google Scholar
• Foubert B., Gijsbrechts E. Shopper response to bundle promotions for packaged goods. J. Marketing Res. (2007) 44(4):647–662Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gatignon H., Eliashberg J., Lilien G. L. Marketing-mix models. Handbooks in Operations Research and Management Science: Marketing (1993) 5(North-Holland, Amsterdam) 697–732Google Scholar
• Gupta S., Lehmann D. R.Managing Your Customers as Investments: The Strategic Value of Customers in the Long Run (2005) (Wharton School Publishing, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia) Google Scholar
• Gupta S., Lehmann D. R., Stuart J. A. Valuing customers. J. Marketing Res. (2004) 41(1):7–18Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hanssens D. M., Parsons L. J., Schultz R. L.Market Response Models: Econometric and Time Series Analysis (2001) (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, MA) Google Scholar
• Harlam B. A., Krishna A., Lehmann D. R., Mela C. Impact of bundle type, price framing and familiarity on purchase intention for the bundle. J. Bus. Res. (1995) 33(1):57–66Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoch S. J., Bradlow E. T., Wansink B. The variety of an assortment. Marketing Sci. (1999) 18(4):527–546Link, Google Scholar
• Hyman M. The high cost of the roller coaster craze. BusinessWeek (2006) May 8). http://images.businessweek.com/ss/06/05/theme_parks/index_01.htm?sub-travelGoogle Scholar
• International Association of Amusement Parks and Attractions (IAAPA) U.S. amusement park attendance and revenue history. (2009) . Retrieved August 19, 2009, http://www.iaapa.org/pressroom/Amusement_Park_Attendance_Revenue_History.aspGoogle Scholar
• Jain D. J., Vilcassim N. J. Investigating household purchase timing decisions: A conditional hazard function approach. Marketing Sci. (1991) 10(1):1–23Link, Google Scholar
• Kemperman A. D. A. M. Temporal aspects of theme park choice behavior. (2000) . Ph.D. thesis, Technische Universiteit Eindhoven, Eindhoven, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
• Kemperman A. D. A. M., Borgers A. W. J., Timmermans H. J. P. A semiparametric hazard model of activity timing and sequencing decisions during visits to theme parks using experimental design data. Tourism Anal. (2002) 7(1):1–13Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kemperman A. D. A. M., Borgers A. W. J., Oppewal H., Timmermans H. J. P. Consumer choice of theme parks: A conjoint choice model of seasonality effects and variety seeking behavior. Leisure Sci. (2000) 22(1):1–18Crossref, Google Scholar
• Law A. M., Kelton W. D.Simulation Modeling and Analysis (1991) 2nd ed.(McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
• Liu Y. D. Profitability measurement of UK theme parks: An aggregate approach. Internat. J. Tourism Res. (2008) 10(3):283–288Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marketing Science Institute Research Priorities: 2008–2010 guide to MSI research programs and procedures. (2008) . Retrieved February 3, 2010, http://www.msi.org/research/index.cfm?id=43Google Scholar
• McAfee R. P., McMillan J., Whinston M. D. Multiproduct monopoly, commodity bundling, and correlation of values. Quart. J. Econom. (1989) 104(2):371–383Crossref, Google Scholar
• McAlister L. Choosing multiple items from a product class. J. Consumer Res. (1979) 6(3):213–224Crossref, Google Scholar
• Milman A. The future of the theme park and attraction industry: A management perspective. J. Travel Res. (2001) 40(2):139–147Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pauwels K., Silva-Risso J., Srinivasan S., Hanssens D. M. New products, sales promotions, and firm value: The case of the automobile industry. J. Marketing (2004) 68(4):142–156Crossref, Google Scholar
• PricewaterhouseCoopers Global Entertainment and media outlook: 2004–2008. (2004–2008) . Report, PricewaterhouseCoopers, New YorkGoogle Scholar
• Rajaram K., Ahmadi R. Flow management to optimize retail profits at theme parks. Oper. Res. (2003) 51(2):175–184Link, Google Scholar
• Ramsay J. O., Silverman B. W.Functional Data Analysis (2006) 2nd ed.(Springer, New York) Google Scholar
• Richins M. L., Bloch P. H. After the new wears off: The temporal context of product involvement. J. Consumer Res. (1986) 13(2):280–285Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roth K. A. Theme park accounting: What do we really do all winter? Management Accounting (1994) 75(8):48–51Google Scholar
• Rubin J. 2006 Theme park attendance numbers demonstrate the benefits of reinvestment. (2007) . Park World, http://parkworld-online.comGoogle Scholar
• Schneider M. New theme park attractions: Summer promises to be best in a while for amusement park fans. (2005) . Canoe.ca, http://travel.canoe.ca/travel/usa/Florida/2005/06/03/1070131.htmlGoogle Scholar
• Solomon M. R.Consumer Behavior, Buying, Having, and Being (2006) 7th ed.(Pearson Education, Upper Saddle River, NJ) Google Scholar
• Sood A., James G. M., Tellis G. J. Functional regression: A new model for predicting market penetration of new products. Marketing Sci. (2009) 28(1):36–51Link, Google Scholar
• Spencer E. P. Euro Disney—What happened? What next? J. Internat. Marketing (1995) 3(3):103–114Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stemerding M., Oppewal H., Timmermans H. J. P. A constraints-induced model of park choice. Leisure Sci. (1999) 21(2):145–158Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stremersch S., Tellis G. J. Strategic bundling of products and prices: A new synthesis for marketing. J. Marketing (2002) 66(1):55–72Crossref, Google Scholar
• Timmermans H., Fisher M. M., Nijkamp P., Papageorgiou Y. Y. Theoretical aspects of variety-seeking choice behaviour. Spatial Choices and Processes (1990) (Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam) 101–114Crossref, Google Scholar
• Train K. E.Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation (2003) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) Crossref, Google Scholar
• van Assendelft de Coningh R. Marketing a theme park: Efteling. J. Vacation Marketing (1995) 1(2):190–194Crossref, Google Scholar
• van Everdingen Y., Fok D., Stremersch S. Modeling global spillover of new product takeoff. J. Marketing Res. (2009) 46(5):637–652Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van Ittersum K., Pennings J. M. E., Wansink B., van Trijp H. C. M. The validity of attribute-importance measurement: A review. J. Bus. Res. (2007) 60(11):1177–1190Crossref, Google Scholar
• Venkatesh R., Mahajan V. Products with branded components: An approach for premium pricing and partner selection. Marketing Sci. (1997) 16(2):146–165Link, Google Scholar
• Vugts O., van Haver R. Business transformation plan 2008. (2008) . Internal company document. Efteling B. V., Kaatsheuvel, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
• Wierenga B.Handbook of Marketing Decision Models (2008) (Springer Science and Business Media, New York) International Series in Operational Research and Management ScienceCrossref, Google Scholar
• Yang S., Huang G. Q., Song H., Liang L. Game-theoretic approach to competition dynamics in tourism supply chains. J. Travel Res. (2009) 47(4):425–439Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhang S., Markman A. B. Processing product unique features: Alignability and involvement in preference construction. J. Consumer Psych. (2001) 11(1):13–27Crossref, Google Scholar