Growing Two-Sided Networks by Advertising the User Base: A Field Experiment

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.1100.0560

References

  • Ai C., Norton E. C. Interaction terms in logit and probit models. Econom. Lett. (2003) 80(1):123–129CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Belsley D. A., Kuh E., Welsch R. E.Regression Diagnostics: Identifying Influential Data and Sources of Collinearity (1980) (John Wiley & Sons, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bradlow E. T., Park Y.-H. Bayesian estimation of bid sequences in Internet auctions using a generalized record-breaking model. Marketing Sci. (2007) 26(2):218–229LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bucklin R. E., Sismeiro C. A model of Web site browsing behavior estimated on clickstream data. J. Marketing Res. (2003) 40(3):249–267CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Camerer C. F., Lovallo D. Overconfidence and excess entry: An experimental approach. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1999) 89(1):306–318CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Camerer C. F., Ho T.-H., Chong J.-K. A cognitive hierarchy model of games. Quart. J. Econom. (2004) 119(3):861–898CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chen Y., Xie J. Cross-market network effect with asymmetric customer loyalty: Implications for competitive advantage. Marketing Sci. (2007) 26(1):52–66LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chen Y., Iyer G., Padmanabhan V. Referral infomediaries. Marketing Sci. (2002) 21(4):412–434LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Debruyne M., Reibstein D. J. Competitor see, competitor do: Incumbent entry in new market niches. Marketing Sci. (2005) 24(1):55–66LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Dudey M. Competition by choice: The effect of consumer search on firm location decisions. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1990) 80(5):1092–1104Google Scholar
  • Ellison G., Ellison S. F. Lessons about markets from the Internet. J. Econom. Perspective (2005) 19(2):139–158CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fath G., Sarvary M. Adoption dynamics in buyer-side exchanges. Quant. Marketing Econom. (2003) 1(3):305–335CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hair J. F., Anderson R. E., Tatham R. L., Black W. C.Multivariate Data Analysis (2009) 7th ed.(Macmillan, New York) Google Scholar
  • Iyer G., Pazgal A. Internet shopping agents: Virtual co-location and competition. Marketing Sci. (2003) 22(1):85–106LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lucking-Reiley D. Auctions on the Internet: What's being auctioned, and how? J. Indust. Econom. (2000) 48(3):227–252CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nair H., Chintagunta P., Dubé J.-P. Empirical analysis of indirect network effects in the market for personal digital assistants. Quant. Marketing Econom. (2004) 2(1):23–58CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Narasimhan C., Zhang Z. J. Market entry strategy under firm heterogeneity and asymmetric payoffs. Marketing Sci. (2000) 19(4):313–327LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Rochet J.-C., Tirole J. Two-sided markets: A progress report. RAND J. Econom. (2006) 37(3):645–667CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Simonsohn U. eBay's crowded evenings: Competition neglect in market entry decisions. Management Sci. (2010) 56(7):1060–1073LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Toivanen O., Waterson M. Market structure and entry: Where's the beef? RAND J. Econom. (2005) 36(3):680–699Google Scholar
  • Wernerfelt B. Selling formats for search goods. Marketing Sci. (1994) 13(3):298–309LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Wernerfelt B. A rational reconstruction of the compromise effect: Using market data to infer utilities. J. Consumer Res. (1995) 21(4):627–633CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.