Estimating Cannibalization Rates for Pioneering Innovations

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.1100.0575

References

  • Abraham M. M., Lodish L. M. Promoter: An automated promotion evaluation system. Marketing Sci. (1987) 6(2):101–123LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ahumada H. A dynamic model of the demand for currency: Argentina 1977–1988. J. Policy Model. (1992) 14(3):335–361CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Albuquerque P., Bronnenberg B. J. Estimating demand heterogeneity using aggregated data: An application to the frozen pizza category. Marketing Sci. (2009) 28(2):356–372LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ataman M. B., Mela C. F., van Heerde H. J. Building brands. Marketing Sci. (2008) 27(6):1036–1054LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ataman M. B., van Heerde H. J., Mela C. F. The long-term effect of marketing strategy on brand sales. J. Marketing Res. (2010) 47(5):866–882CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Basuroy S., Mantrala M. K., Walters R. G. The impact of category management on retailer prices and performance: Theory and evidence. J. Marketing (2001) 65(4):16–32CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Berkovec J. New car sales and used car stocks: A model of the automobile market. RAND J. Econom. (1985) 16(2):195–214CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bijmolt T. H. A., van Heerde H. J., Pieters R. G. M. New empirical generalizations on the determinants of price elasticity. J. Marketing Res. (2005) 42(2):141–156CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Biyalogorsky E., Naik P. Clicks and mortar: The effect of on-line activities on off-line sales. Marketing Lett. (2003) 14(1):21–32CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bradlow E. T., Hu Y., Ho T.-H. A learning-based model for imputing missing levels in partial conjoint profiles. J. Marketing Res. (2004) 41(4):369–381CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • BrandWeek Full court press—The success of Lexus. (1998) . http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0BDW/is_n30_v39/ai_20992600/pg_1Google Scholar
  • Carpenter G. S., Hanssens D. M. Market expansion, cannibalization and international airline pricing strategy. Internat. J. Forecasting (1994) 10(2):313–326CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cooper L. G. Strategic marketing planning for radically new products. J. Marketing (2000) 64(1):1–16CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cooper L. G., De Leeuw J., Sogomonian A. G. An imputation method for dealing with missing data in regression. Appl. Stochastic Models Data Anal. (1991) 7(3):213–235CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Day G. S., Shocker A. D., Srivastava R. K. Customer-oriented approaches to identifying product-markets. J. Marketing (1979) 43(4):8–19CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dekimpe M. G., Hanssens D. M. Sustained spending and persistent response: A new look at long-term marketing profitability. J. Marketing Res. (1999) 36(4):397–412CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Deleersnyder B., Geyskens I., Gielens K., Dekimpe M. G. How cannibalistic is the Internet channel? A study of the newspaper industry in the United Kingdom and The Netherlands. Internat. J. Res. Marketing (2002) 19(4):337–348CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Engle R. F., Hendry D. F., Richard J.-F. Exogeneity. Econometrica (1983) 51(2):277–304CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fok D., Horváth C., Paap R., Franses P. H. B. F. A hierarchical Bayes error-correction model to explain dynamic effects of price changes. J. Marketing Res. (2006) 43(3):443–462CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Franses P. H. On the use of econometric models for policy simulation in marketing. J. Marketing Res. (2005) 42(1):4–14CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gardner G., Winter D. Let's call them “HYVES”: Hybrid car/truck designs are the next big thing. Ward's AutoWorld (1998) February 1). http://wardsautoworld.com/ar/auto_lets_call_hyves/index.htmlGoogle Scholar
  • Gatignon H., Eliashberg J., Lilien G. L. Marketing-mix models. Handbooks of Operations Research and Management Science: Marketing (1993) (Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam) 697–732Google Scholar
  • Gielens K., Steenkamp J.-B. E. M. Drivers of consumer acceptance of new packaged goods: An investigation across products and countries. Internat. J. Res. Marketing (2007) 24(2):97–111CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Goldberg P. K. Dealer price discrimination in new car purchases: Evidence from the consumer expenditure survey. J. Political Econom. (1996) 104(3):622–654CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Graham J., Baig E. C. Q&A with Jobs: “That's what happens in technology”. USA Today (2007) September 5). http://www.usatoday.com/tech/products/2007-09-05-jobs-qanda_N.htmGoogle Scholar
  • Gupta S. Impact of sales promotion on when, what and how much to buy. J. Marketing Res. (1988) 25(4):342–355CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hauser J. R., Tellis G. J., Griffin A. Research on innovation: A review and agenda for Marketing Science. Marketing Sci. (2006) 25(6):687–717LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hendry D. F.Dynamic Econometrics (1995) (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kornelis M., Dekimpe M. G., Leeflang P. S. H. Does competitive entry structurally change key marketing metrics? Internat. J. Res. Marketing (2008) 25(3):173–182CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lachaab M., Ansari A., Jedidi K., Trabelsi A. Modeling preference evolution in discrete choice models: A Bayesian state-space approach. Quant. Marketing Econom. (2006) 4(1):57–81CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lancaster K. M. Brand advertising competition and industry demand. J. Advertising (1984) 13(4):19–24CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lassa T. Rx for SUVs. AutoWeek (1998) February 2):5Google Scholar
  • LeClaire J. Will the iPhone cannibalize iPod sales? Sci-Tech Today.com (2007) June 5). http://www.sci-tech-today.com/news/Will-the-iPhone-Cannibalize-iPod-Sales/story.xhtml?story_id=011001CEERZHGoogle Scholar
  • Leeflang P. S. H., Wittink D. R., Wedel M., Naert P. A.Building Models for Marketing Decisions (2000) (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lemieux J., McAlister L. Handling missing values in marketing data: A comparison of techniques. (2005) . MSI Report 05-107, Marketing Science Institute, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  • Leone R. P. Generalizing what is known about temporal aggregation and advertising carryover. Marketing Sci. (1995) 14(3 Supplement):G141–G150LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lieberman M. B., Montgomery D. B. First-mover advantages. Strategic Management J. (1988) 9(2):41–58CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lucas R. E., Brunner K., Meltzer A. H. Econometric policy evaluation: A critique. The Philips Curve and the Labour Market (1976) 1(North-Holland, Amsterdam) 19–46Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public PolicyCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mahajan V., Muller E., Wind Y.New-Product Diffusion Models (2000) (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston) Google Scholar
  • Mannering F., Winston C. A dynamic empirical analysis of household vehicle ownership and utilization. RAND J. Econom. (1985) 16(2):215–236CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Moreau P. C., Markman A. B., Lehmann D. R. “What is it?” Categorization flexibility and consumers' responses to really new products. J. Consumer Res. (2001) 27(4):489–498CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Neelamegham R., Chintagunta P. K. Modeling and forecasting the sales of technology products. Quant. Marketing Econom. (2004) 2(3):195–232CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nijs V. R., Dekimpe M. G., Steenkamp J.-B. E. M., Hanssens D. M. The category demand effects of price promotions. Marketing Sci. (2001) 20(1):1–22LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Parasuraman A., Grewal D., Krishnan R.Marketing Research (2004) (Houghton Mifflin Company, New York) Google Scholar
  • Pauwels K. H., Hanssens D. M. Performance regimes and marketing policy shifts. Marketing Sci. (2007) 26(3):293–311LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Pauwels K. H., Srinivasan S. Who benefits from store brand entry? Marketing Sci. (2004) 23(3):364–390LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Perron P., Bhaskara Rao B. Trend, unit root and structural change in macroeconomic time series. Cointegration for the Applied Economist (1994) (St. Martins Press, New York) 113–146CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Phelan M. Lexus RX300 challenges Mercedes M-class—Lexus RX300 sport utility vehicle. Automotive Industries (1998) January). http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m3012/is_n1_v178/ai_20160853/Google Scholar
  • Reddy S. K., Holak S. L., Bhat S. To extend or not to extend: Success determinants of line extensions. J. Marketing Res. (1994) 31(2):243–262CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rogers E. M.Diffusion of Innovations (2003) 5th ed.(Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Schultz R. L., Wittink D. R. The measurement of industry advertising effects. J. Marketing Res. (1976) 13(1):71–75CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schweidel D. A., Fader P. S., Bradlow E. T. Understanding service retention within and across cohorts using limited information. J. Marketing (2008) 72(1):82–94CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sethuraman R., Srinivasan V., Kim D. Asymmetric and neighborhood cross-price effects: Some empirical generalizations. Marketing Sci. (1999) 18(1):23–41LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Silva-Risso J. M., Ionova I. A nested logit model of product and transaction-type choice for planning automakers' pricing and promotions. Marketing Sci. (2008) 27(4):545–566LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Srinivasan S., Pauwels K. H., Silva-Risso J., Hanssens D. M. Product innovations, advertising, and stock returns. J. Marketing (2009) 73(1):24–43CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Srinivasan S. R., Ramakrishnan S., Grasman S. E. Incorporating cannibalization models into demand forecasting. Marketing Intelligence Planning (2005) 23(5):470–485CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Steenburgh T. J. Measuring consumer and competitive impact with elasticity decompositions. J. Marketing Res. (2007) 44(4):636–646CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Steenkamp J.-B. E. M., Nijs V. R., Hanssens D. M., Dekimpe M. G. Competitive reactions to advertising and promotion attacks. Marketing Sci. (2005) 24(1):35–54LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Tellis G. J., Tellis G. J., Ambler T. Advertising effectiveness in contemporary markets. The Sage Handbook of Advertising (2007) (Sage Publications, London) 264–280CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tellis G. J., Crawford M. C. An evolutionary approach to product growth theory. J. Marketing (1981) 45(4):125–132CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • van Everdingen Y. M., Aghina W. B., Fok D. Forecasting cross-population innovation diffusion: A Bayesian approach. Internat. J. Res. Marketing (2005) 22(3):293–308CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • van Heerde H. J., Dekimpe M. G., Putsis W. P. Marketing models and the Lucas critique. J. Marketing Res. (2005) 42(1):15–21CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • van Heerde H. J., Gupta S., Wittink D. R. Is 75% of the sales promotion bump due to brand switching? No, only 33% is. J. Marketing Res. (2003) 40(4):481–491CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • van Heerde H. J., Helsen K., Dekimpe M. G. The impact of a product-harm crisis on marketing effectiveness. Marketing Sci. (2007) 26(2):230–245LinkGoogle Scholar
  • van Heerde H. J., Leeflang P. S. H., Wittink D. R. Decomposing the sales promotion bump with store data. Marketing Sci. (2004a) 23(3):317–334LinkGoogle Scholar
  • van Heerde H. J., Mela C. F., Manchanda P. The dynamic effect of innovation on market structure. J. Marketing Res. (2004b) 41(2):166–183CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wedel M., Zhang J. Analyzing brand competition across subcategories. J. Marketing Res. (2004) 41(4):448–456CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • West M., Harrison J.Bayesian Forecasting and Dynamic Models (1999) 2nd ed.(Springer, New York) Google Scholar
  • Winer R. S. An analysis of the time-varying effects of advertising: The case of Lydia Pinkham. J. Bus. (1979) 52(4):563–588CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zanutto E. L., Bradlow E. T. Data pruning in consumer choice models. Quant. Marketing Econom. (2006) 4(3):267–287CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zenor M. H. The profit benefits of category management. J. Marketing Res. (1994) 31(2):202–213CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.