Optimal Reverse Channel Structure for Consumer Product Returns

References

• Anderson E. T., Hansen K., Simester D. The option value of returns: Theory and empirical evidence. Marketing Sci. (2009) 28(3):405–423Link, Google Scholar
• Arya A., Mittendorf B. Using return policies to elicit retailer information. RAND J. Econom. (2004) 35(3):617–630Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cachon G. P., Graves S. C., de Kok A. G. Supply chain coordination with contracts. Handbooks in Operations Research and Management Science: Supply Chain Management (2003) (North Holland, Amsterdam) 229–340Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chao G. H., Iravani S. M. R., Savaskan R. C. Quality improvement incentives and product recall cost sharing contracts. Management Sci. (2009) 55(7):1122–1138Link, Google Scholar
• Che Y.-K. Consumer return policies for experience goods. J. Indust. Econom. (1996) 44(1):17–24Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chu W., Gerstner E., Hess J. D. Managing dissatisfaction: How to decrease customer opportunism by partial refunds. J. Service Res. (1998) 1(2):140–155Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davis S., Gerstner E., Hagerty M. Money back guarantees in retailing: Matching products to consumer tastes. J. Retailing (1995) 71(1):7–22Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davis S., Hagerty M., Gerstner E. Return policies and the optimal level of “hassle”. J. Econom. Bus. (1998) 50(5):445–460Crossref, Google Scholar
• Emmons H., Gilbert S. M. The role of returns policies in pricing and inventory decisions for catalogue goods. Management Sci. (1998) 44(2):276–283Link, Google Scholar
• He C., Marklund J., Vossen T. Vertical information sharing in a volatile market. Marketing Sci. (2008) 27(3):513–530Link, Google Scholar
• Iyer G., Villas-Boas J. M. A bargaining theory of distribution channels. J. Marketing Res. (2003) 40(1):80–100Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D., Tversky A. Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica (1979) 47(2):263–291Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kandel E. The right to return. J. Law Econom. (1996) 39(1):329–356Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lawton C. The war on returns. Wall Street Journal (2008) May 8):D1Google Scholar
• Matthews S. A., Persico N. Information acquisition and the excess refund puzzle. (2005) . Working paper, University of Pennsylvania, PhiladelphiaCrossref, Google Scholar
• Middleton D. Stores cracking down on returns; Target is one of many retailers tightening policies and implementing restocking fees. Florida Times-Union (2007) May 19):A-1Google Scholar
• Nelson P. Information and consumer behavior. J. Political Econom. (1970) 78(2):311–329Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ofek E., Katona Z., Sarvary M. “Bricks and clicks”: The impact of product returns on the strategies of multichannel retailers. Marketing Sci. (2010) . ePub ahead of print July 29, http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mksc.1100.0588Google Scholar
• Padmanabhan V., Png I. P. L. Manufacturer's returns policies and retail competition. Marketing Sci. (1997) 16(1):81–94Link, Google Scholar
• Padmanabhan V., Png I. P. L. Reply to “Do returns policies intensify retail competition?”. Marketing Sci. (2004) 23(4):614–618Link, Google Scholar
• Pasternack B. A. Optimal pricing and return policies for perishable commodities. Marketing Sci. (1985) 4(2):166–176Link, Google Scholar
• Rogers D. S., Tibbens-Lembke R. S.Going Backwards: Reverse Logistics Trends and Practices (1998) (Reverse Logistics Executive Council, Reno, NV) Google Scholar
• Shame On You: Victoria's Secret, Saks and Macy's First broadcast November 19, 2003 by WCBS (New York). (2003) . Produced by Arnold DiazGoogle Scholar
• Shulman J. D., Coughlan A. T., Savaskan R. C. Optimal restocking fees and information provision in an integrated demand-supply model of product returns. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management (2009) 11(4):577–594Link, Google Scholar
• Strauss M. Report on business: Canadian; inventory management. The Globe and Mail (2007) January 15):B1Google Scholar