The Effects of Information Transparency on Suppliers, Manufacturers, and Consumers in Online Markets

References

• Alibaba Alibaba.com announces full year 2007 results. (2008) . Press release (March 18), http://www.alibaba.com/aboutalibaba/releases_080318.htmlGoogle Scholar
• Bakos J. Y. Reducing buyer search costs: Implications for electronic marketplaces. Management Sci. (1997) 43(12):1676–1692Link, Google Scholar
• Bakos J. Y., Brynjolfsson E. Information technology, incentives, and the optimal number of suppliers. J. Management Inform. Systems (1993) 10(2):37–53Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cachon G. P., Fisher M. Supply chain inventory management and the value of shared information. Management Sci. (2000) 46(8):1032–1048Link, Google Scholar
• Coughlan A. T. Competition and cooperation in marketing channel choice: Theory and application. Marketing Sci. (1985) 4(2):110–129Link, Google Scholar
• Chu W. Demand signalling and screening in channels of distribution. Marketing Sci. (1992) 11(4):327–347Link, Google Scholar
• Desai P. S. Multiple messages to retain retailers: Signaling new product demand. Marketing Sci. (2000) 19(4):381–389Link, Google Scholar
• Gal-Or E. Information sharing in oligopoly. Econometrica (1985) 53(2):329–343Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gavirneni S., Kapuscinski R., Tayur S. Value of information in capacitated supply chains. Management Sci. (1999) 45(1):16–24Link, Google Scholar
• Gerstner E., Hess J. D. Pull promotions and channel coordination. Marketing Sci. (1995) 14(1):43–60Link, Google Scholar
• Guo L. The benefits of downstream information acquisition. Marketing Sci. (2009) 28(3):457–471Link, Google Scholar
• Hansen R. G. Auctions with endogenous quantity. RAND J. Econom. (1988) 19(1):44–58Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harsanyi J. C. Games with incomplete information played by “Bayesian” players, I–III. Part I. The basic model. Management Sci. (1967) 14(3):159–182Link, Google Scholar
• Haskel J., Martin C. Capacity and competition: Empirical evidence on UK panel data. J. Indust. Econom. (1994) 42(1):23–44Crossref, Google Scholar
• He C., Marklund J., Vossen T. Vertical information sharing in a volatile market. Marketing Sci. (2008) 27(3):513–530Link, Google Scholar
• Hitt L. M., Brynjolfsson E. Productivity, business profitability, and consumer surplus: Three different measures of information technology value. MIS Quart. (1996) 20(2):121–142Crossref, Google Scholar
• Iyer G. Coordinating channels under price and nonprice competition. Marketing Sci. (1998) 17(4):338–355Link, Google Scholar
• Iyer G., Narasimhan C., Niraj R. Information and inventory in distribution channels. Management Sci. (2007) 53(10):1551–1561Link, Google Scholar
• Jeuland A. P., Shugan S. M. Managing channel profits. Marketing Sci. (1983) 2(3):239–272Link, Google Scholar
• Kalvenes J., Basu A. Design of robust business-to-business electronic marketplaces with guaranteed privacy. Management Sci. (2006) 52(11):1721–1736Link, Google Scholar
• Koch C. Interview: Covisint's last chance. CIO (2002) December 1). http://www.cio.com/archive/120102/ecomm.htmlGoogle Scholar
• Kreps D. M., Scheinkman J. A. Quantity precommitment and Bertrand competition yield Cournot outcomes. Bell J. Econom. (1983) 14(2):326–337Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kulp S. C., Lee H. L., Ofek E. Manufacturer benefits from information integration with retail customers. Management Sci. (2004) 50(4):431–444Link, Google Scholar
• Lee H. L., Padmanabhan V., Whang S. Information distortion in a supply chain: The bullwhip effect. Management Sci. (1997) 43(4):546–558Link, Google Scholar
• Lee H., So K. C., Tang C. S. The value of information sharing in a two-level supply chain. Management Sci. (2000) 46(5):626–643Link, Google Scholar
• Logistics Today Retail exchanges GNX and WWRE agree to merger. (2005) May 2). http://logisticstoday.com/global_markets/outlog_story_7127/Google Scholar
• Milgrom P. Auctions and bidding: A primer. J. Econom. Perspect. (1989) 3(3):3–22Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pinker E. J., Seidmann A., Vakrat Y. Managing online auctions: Current business and research issues. Management Sci. (2003) 49(11):1457–1484Link, Google Scholar
• Raith M. A general model of information sharing in oligopoly. J. Econom. Theory. (1996) 71(1):260–288Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sairamesh J., Mohan R., Kumar M., Hasson L., Bender C. A platform for business-to-business sell-side, private exchanges and marketplaces. IBM Systems J. (2002) 41(2):242–252Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shaffer G., Zettelmeyer F. Advertising in a distribution channel. Marketing Sci. (2004) 23(4):619–628Link, Google Scholar
• Shapiro C. Exchange of cost information in oligopoly. Rev. Econom. Stud. (1986) 53(3):433–446Crossref, Google Scholar
• Soh C., Markus M. L., Goh K. H. Electronic marketplaces and price transparency: Strategy, information technology and success. MIS Quart. (2006) 30(3):705–723Crossref, Google Scholar
• U.S. Census Bureau E-stats—Measuring the electronic economy: Frequently asked questions. . Accessed November 2008, http://www.census.gov/eos/www/faq.htmlGoogle Scholar
• U.S. Census Bureau Quarterly retail e-commerce sales: 2nd quarter 2009. (2009) . Release (August 17), http://www.census.gov/retail/mrts/www/data/html/09Q2.htmlGoogle Scholar
• Vives X. Duopoly information equilibrium: Cournot and Bertrand. J. Econom. Theory (1984) 34(1):71–94Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vives X. Private information, strategic behavior, and efficiency in Cournot markets. RAND J. Econom. (2002) 33(3):361–376Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yoo B., Choudhary V., Mukhopadhyay T. Electronic B2B marketplaces with different ownership structures. Management Sci. (2007) 53(6):952–961Link, Google Scholar
• Zhu K. Information transparency of business-to-business electronic markets: A game-theoretic analysis. Management Sci. (2004) 50(5):670–685Link, Google Scholar
• Zirpoli F., Caputo M. The nature of the buyer-supplier relationships in co-design activities: The Italian auto industry case. Internat. J. Oper. Production Management (2002) 22(12):1389–1410Crossref, Google Scholar