Measuring the Impact of Negative Demand Shocks on Car Dealer Networks

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.1110.0659

References

  • Ball J. Auto dealers, fearing that Detroit will hog the Web, fight back. Wall Street Journal (2000) May 10):A1A12Google Scholar
  • Berry S., Levinsohn J., Pakes A. Automobile prices in market equilibrium. Econometrica (1995) 63(4):841–890CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Berry S., Levinsohn J., Pakes A. Differentiated products demand systems from a combination of micro and macro data: The new car market. J. Political Econom. (2004) 112(1):68–105CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bruce N., Desai P., Staelin R. Enabling the willing: Consumer rebates for durable goods. Marketing Sci. (2006) 25(4):350–366LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bucklin R. E., Siddarth S., Silva-Risso J. M. Distribution intensity and new car choice. J. Marketing Res. (2008) 45(4):473–486CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cardell N. S. Variance components structures for the extreme-value and logistic distributions with applications to models of heterogeneity. Econom. Theory (1997) 13(2):185–213CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Davis P. Spatial competition in retail markets: Movie theaters. RAND J. Econom. (2001) 37(4):964–982CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Duan J. A., Mela C. F. The role of spatial demand on outlet location and pricing. J. Marketing Res. (2009) 46(2):260–278CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ellickson P. B., Misra S. Supermarket pricing strategies. Marketing Sci. (2008) 27(5):811–828LinkGoogle Scholar
  • General Motors Corporation (GM) Restructuring plan for long-term viability. (2008) . Report submitted to Senate Banking Committee and House of Representatives Financial Services Committee, December 2, DetroitGoogle Scholar
  • Ho K. Insurer-provider networks in the medical care market. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2009) 99(1):393–430CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hoch S. J., Kim B.-D., Montgomery A. L., Rossi P. E. Determinants of store-level price elasticity. J. Marketing Res. (1995) 32(1):17–29CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hofbauer R. “Good” store brand products important to store choice. Progressive Grocer's Store Brands (2011) June). http://www.pgstorebrands.com/article-_good_store_brand_products_important_to_store_choice-1859.htmlGoogle Scholar
  • Irmen A., Thisse J.-F. Competition in multi-characteristics spaces: Hotelling was almost right. J. Econom. Theory (1998) 78(1):76–102CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ishii J. Compatibility, competition, and investment in network industries: ATM networks in the banking industry. (2008) . Working paper, Stanford University, Stanford, CAGoogle Scholar
  • Krolicki K., Kim S. Auto sales end '09 in an upswing. Reuters (2010) January 5). http://www.reuters.com/article/2010/01/05/US-autos-ford-idUSTRE60441E20100105Google Scholar
  • Li S., Linn J., Spiller E. Evaluating “cash-for-clunkers”: Program effect on auto sales, jobs, and the environment. (2010) . Discussion Paper dp-10-39, Resources for the Future, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  • Lienert D. Do American cars make money. Forbes (2003) October 6). http://www.forbes.com/2003/10/06/cx_dl_1006feat.htmlGoogle Scholar
  • Luan J. Y., Sudhir K., Norris B. Dynamic market structure in a durable goods market: The effect of a new product form. (2007) . Working paper, Yale School of Management, New Haven, CTGoogle Scholar
  • Mazzeo M. J. Product choice and oligopoly market structure. RAND J. Econom. (2002) 33(2):1–22CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • National Automobile Dealers Association NADA Data, by NADA's Industry Analysis Division. AutoExec (2008) May):43–63Google Scholar
  • Pakes A., Porter J., Ho K., Ishii J. Moment inequalities and their application. (2008) . Working paper, Harvard University, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  • Pancras J., Sudhir K. Optimal marketing strategies for a customer data intermediary. J. Marketing Res. (2007) 44(4):560–578CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Petrin A. Quantifying the benefits of new products: The case of the minivan. J. Political Econom. (2002) 110(4):705–729CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Petrin A., Train K. A control function approach to endogeneity in consumer choice models. J. Marketing Res. (2010) 47(1):3–13CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Richards T. A nested logit model of strategic promotion. Quant. Marketing Econom. (2007) 5(1):63–91CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Scott Morton F., Zettelmeyer F., Silva-Risso J. Internet car retailing. J. Indust. Econom. (2001) 49(4):501–519CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sudhir K. Competitive pricing behavior in the auto market: A structural analysis. Marketing Sci. (2001) 20(1):42–60LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Swait J. Choice set generation within the generalized extreme value family of discrete choice models. Transportation Res. (2001) 35(7):643–666CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Thomadsen R. Product positioning and competition: The role of location in the fast food industry. Marketing Sci. (2007) 26(6):792–804LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Venkataraman S., Kadiyali V. An aggregate generalized nested logit model of consumer choices: An application to the lodging industry. (2007) . Johnson School Research Paper 12-07, Cornell University, Ithaca, NYGoogle Scholar
  • Villas-Boas S. B. Vertical relationships between manufacturers and retailers: Inference with limited data. Rev. Econom. Stud. (2007) 74(2):625–652CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zettelmeyer F., Morton F. S., Silva-Risso J. How the Internet lowers prices: Evidence from matched survey and automobile transaction data. J. Marketing Res. (2007) 43(2):168–181CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zino K. Chrysler group September 2009 sales drop 42%. Detroit Bureau (2009) October 1). http://www.thedetroitbureau.com/2009/10/chrysler-group-september-2009-sales-drop-42/Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.