Quantifying Transaction Costs in Online/Off-line Grocery Channel Choice

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.1110.0678

References

  • Balasubramanian S. Mail versus mall: A strategic analysis of competition between direct marketers and conventional retailers. Marketing Sci. (1998) 17(3):181–195LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Becker G. S. A theory of the allocation of time. Econom. J. (1965) 75(299):493–517Google Scholar
  • Bell D., Ho T. H., Tang C. Determining where to shop: Fixed and variable costs of shopping. J. Marketing Res. (1998) 35(3):352–369CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Betancourt R. R.The Economics of Retailing and Distribution (2005) (Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, UK) Google Scholar
  • Betancourt R. R., Gautschi D. A. The evolution of retailing: A suggested economic interpretation. Internat. J. Res. Marketing (1986) 3(4):217–232CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Betancourt R. R., Gautschi D. A. The economics of retail firms. Managerial Decision Econom. (1988) 9(2):133–144CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Briesch R., Chintagunta P., Fox E. How does assortment affect grocery store choice? J. Marketing Res. (2009) 46(2):176–189CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • BusinessWeekOnline Q&A with Tesco.com's John Browett. (2001) October 1). http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/01_40/b3751626.htmGoogle Scholar
  • Chib S., Heckman J. J., Leamer E. E. Markov chain Monte Carlo methods: Computation and inference. Handbook of Econometrics (2001) 5(North-Holland, Amsterdam) 3569–3649CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chintagunta P., Chu J. Category selection and store choice modeling. (2011) . Working paper, Booth School of Business, University of Chicago, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  • Chircu A. M., Mahajan V. Managing electronic commerce retail transaction costs for customer value. Decision Support Systems (2006) 42(2):898–914CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chu J., Chintagunta P., Cebollada J. A comparison of within-household price sensitivity across online and off-line channels. Marketing Sci. (2008) 27(2):283–299LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chu J., Arce-Urriza M., Cebollada-Calvo J.-J., Chintagunta P. K. An empirical analysis of shopping behavior across online and offline channels for grocery products: The moderating effects of household and product characteristics. J. Interactive Marketing (2010) 24(4):251–268CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Coase R. H. The nature of the firm. Economica (1937) 4(16):386–405CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Conley T. G., Hansen C. B., Rossi P. E. Plausibly exogenous. Rev. Econom. Statist. (2010) . ePub ahead of print October 7Google Scholar
  • Cool Green & Shady Satisfaction guarantee. (2011) . Accessed April 13, 2011, http://www.coolgreenandshady.com/cgsLegalSG.aspxGoogle Scholar
  • Demby E. R. Pricey and perishable, online supermarkets struggle to deliver on their retail promise. (2000) . Internet Retailer (December 26), http://www.internetretailer.com/2000/12/26/pricey-and-perishable-online-supermarkets-struggle-to-deliver-o?p=1Google Scholar
  • Devaraj S., Fan M., Kohli R. Antecedents of B2C channel satisfaction and preference: Validating e-commerce metrics. Inform. Systems Res. (2002) 13(3):316–333LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Economist, The Online grocers: Keep on trucking. (2010) July 15). http://www.economist.com/node/16595179Google Scholar
  • Forman C., Ghose A., Goldfarb A. Competition between local and electronic markets: How the benefits of buying online depends on where you live. Management Sci. (2009) 55(1):47–57LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Fox E., Montgomery A., Lodish L. Consumer shopping and spending across retail formats. J. Bus. (2004) 77(2):S25–S60CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Furubotn E. G., Richter R.Institutions and Economic Theory (1997) (University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor) Google Scholar
  • Gupta S. Impact of sales promotions as when, what, and how much to buy. J. Marketing Res. (1988) 25(4):342–355CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hoch S. J., Kim B., Montgomery A. L., Rossi P. E. Determinants of store-level price elasticity. J. Marketing Res. (1995) 32(1):17–29CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ingene C. A. Productivity and functional shifting in spatial retailing. J. Retailing (1984) 60(Fall):15–36Google Scholar
  • Kacen J. J., Hess J. D., Chiang W.-Y. K. Bricks or clicks? Consumer attitude toward traditional stores and online stores. (2003) . Working paper, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign, ChampaignGoogle Scholar
  • Kahn B., Schmittlein D. Shopping trip behavior: An empirical investigation. Marketing Lett. (1989) 1(December):55–70CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Keeny R. L. The value of Internet commerce to the customer. Management Sci. (1999) 45(4):533–542LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lee S.-Y. T., Png I. P. L. Buyer shopping costs and retail pricing: An indirect empirical test. Rev. Marketing Sci. (2004) 2(1). Article 6. http://www.bepress.com/romsjournal/vol2/iss1/art6CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lewis M., Singh V., Fay S. An empirical study of the impact of nonlinear shipping and handling fees on purchase incidence and expenditure decisions. Marketing Sci. (2006) 25(1):51–64LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Liang T.-P., Huang J.-S. An empirical study on consumer acceptance of products in electronic markets: A transaction cost model. Decision Support Systems (1998) 24(1):29–43CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Matas A., Raymond J.-L., Roig J.-L. Car ownership and access to jobs in Spain. Transportation Res. Part A (2009) 43(6):607–617Google Scholar
  • Messinger P. R., Narasimhan C. A model of retail formats based on consumers' economizing on shopping time. Marketing Sci. (1997) 16(1):1–23LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Nick Why in the world are you not grocery shopping online? Punny Money (blog) (2007) October 31). http://www.punny.org/money/why-in-the-world-are-you-not-grocery-shopping-online/Google Scholar
  • Pashigian B., Peltzman S., Sun J. M. Firm responses to income inequality and the cost of time. Rev. Indust. Organ. (2003) 22(4):253–273CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Peapod Peapod growing greener. (2011) . Accessed November 18, http://www.peapod.com/brownGrowingGreenerDeliveryTimes-Page.jhtmlGoogle Scholar
  • Petrin A., Train K. A control function approach to endogeneity in consumer choice models. J. Marketing Res. (2010) 47(1):3–13CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rossi P., Allenby G., McCulloch R.Bayesian Statistics and Marketing (2005) (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sinai T., Waldfogel J. Geography and the Internet: Is the Internet a substitute or a complement for cities? J. Urban Econom. (2004) 56(1):1–24CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Smith M., Brynjolfsson E. Consumer decision making at an Internet shopbot: Brand still matters. J. Indust. Econom. (2001) 49(4):541–558CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Emission facts. (2005) . Report EPA420-F-05–004, USEPA, Washington, DC. http://www.epa.gov/oms/climate/420f05004.pdfGoogle Scholar
  • Williamson O. E. Transaction cost economics: The governance of contractual relations. J. Law Econom. (1979) 22(2):233–261CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Williamson O. E. The economics of organization: The transaction cost approach. Amer. J. Sociol. (1981) 87(3):547–577CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Williamson O. E., Masten S. E.The Economics of Transaction Costs (1999) (Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, UK) Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.