Optimal Admission and Scholarship Decisions: Choosing Customized Marketing Offers to Attract a Desirable Mix of Customers

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.1120.0707

References

  • Allenby GM, Arora N, Ginter JL. Incorporating prior knowledge into the analysis of conjoint studies. J. Marketing Res. (1995) 32(2):152–162CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Allenby GM, Leone RP, Jen L. A dynamic model of purchase timing with application to direct marketing. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. (1999) 94(446):365–366CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Avery C, Hoxby CM, Hoxby C. Do and should financial aid packages affect students' college choices? College Choices: The Economics of Which College, When College, and How to Pay for It (2004) (University of Chicago Press, Chicago) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Birge JR, Louveaux F. Introduction to Stochastic Programming (1997) (Springer-Verlag, New York) Google Scholar
  • Bonami P, Biegler LT, Conn AR, Cornuéjols G, Grossmann IE, Laird CD, Lee J, et al. An algorithmic framework for convex mixed integer nonlinear programs. Discrete Optim. (2008) 5(2):186–204CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Carver MR, King TE. An empirical investigation of the MBA admission criteria for nontraditional programs. J. Ed. Bus. (1994) 70(2):94–98Google Scholar
  • Chapman RG. Pricing policy and the college choice process. Res. Higher Ed. (1979) 10(1):37–57CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chapman RG, Staelin R. Exploiting rank ordered choice set data within the stochastic utility model. J. Marketing Res. (1982) 19(3):288–301CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chen KD, Hausman WH. Mathematical properties of the optimal product line selection problem using choice-based conjoint analysis. Management Sci. (2000) 46(2):327–332LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cleveland WS. Robust locally weighted regression and smoothing scatterplots. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. (1979) 74(368):829–836CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cominole M, Siegel P, Dudley K, Roe D, Gilligan T, Griffith J. 2004 national postsecondary student aid study (NPSAS:04): Full-scale methodology report. (2006) . Report, U.S. Department of Education, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  • Deckro RF, Woundenberg HW. M.B.A. admission criteria and academic success. Decision Sci (1977) 8(4):765–769CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • DesJardins SJ. Assessing the effects of changing institutional aid policy. Res. Higher Ed. (2001) 42(6):653–678CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ehrenberg RG, Sherman DR. Optimal financial aid policies for a selective university. J. Human Resources (1984) 19(2):202–230CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Epple D, Romano R, Sieg H. Peer effects, financial aid and selection of students into colleges and universities: An empirical analysis. J. Appl. Econometrics (2003) 18(5):501–525CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fisher ML. The Lagrangian relaxation method for solving integer programming problems. Management Sci. (1981) 27(1):1–18LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Fisher ML. The Lagrangian relaxation method for solving integer programming problems. Management Sci. (2004) 50(12):1861–1871LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gallant AR, Tauchen G. EMM: A program for efficient method of moments estimation version 2.6. (2010) . Accessed March 7, 2012, http://econ.duke.edu/~get/emm.htmlGoogle Scholar
  • Gustafsson A, Herrmann A, Huber F. Conjoint Measurement: Methods and Applications (2007) 4th ed.(Springer, Berlin) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Held M, Karp RM. The traveling-salesman problem and minimum spanning trees: Part II. Math. Programming (1971) 1(1):6–25CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hiriart-Urruty J-B, Lemaréchal C. Convex Analysis and Minimization Algorithms. Grund. der math. Wissenschaften (1993) (Springer-Verlag, Berlin) 305–306CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Iida H. A note on the max-min 0-1 knapsack problem. J. Combin. Optim. (1999) 3(1):89–94CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jünger M, Reinelt G, Rinaldi G. The traveling salesman problem. (1994) . Preprint 94-12, Interdisziplinãres Zentrum für Wissneschaftliches Rechnen der Universitãt Heidelberg, Heidelberg, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  • Khan R, Lewis M, Singh V. Dynamic customer management and the value of one-to-one marketing. Marketing Sci. (2009) 28(6):1063–1079LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Manchanda P, Rossi PE, Chintagunta PK. Response modeling with non-random marketing mix variables. J. Marketing Res. (2004) 41(November):467–478CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Manski C, Wise D. College Choice in America (1983) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Marsh LC, Zellner A. Bayesian solutions to graduate admissions and related selection problems. J. Econometrics (2004) 121(1--2):405–426CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Niu SX, Tienda M. Choosing colleges: Identifying and modeling choice sets. Soc. Sci. Res. (2008) 37(2):416–433CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nurnberg P, Schapiro M, Zimmerman D. Students choosing colleges: Understanding the matriculation decision at a highly selective private institution. Econom. Ed. Rev. (2012) 3(1):1–8CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Punj GN, Staelin R. The choice process for graduate business schools. J. Marketing Res. (1978) 15(4):588–598CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Reinartz WJ, Kumar V. The impact of customer relationship characteristics on profitable lifetime duration. J. Marketing (2003) 67(1):77–99CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rossi PE, McCulloch RE, Allenby GM. The value of purchase history data in target marketing. Marketing Sci. (1996) 15(4):321–340LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Schön C. On the optimal product line selection problem with price discrimination. Management Sci. (2010) 56(5):896–902LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Smith JE, Winkler RL. The optimizers curse: Skepticism and postdecision surprise in decision analysis. Management Sci. (2006) 52(3):311–322LinkGoogle Scholar
  • State Higher Education Executive Officers State higher education finance fiscal year 2008 report. (2009) . Report, SHEEO, Boulder, COGoogle Scholar
  • U.S. Department of Education Digest of education statistics—2009 digest tables directory. (2009) . Retrieved January 23, 2011, http://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/2009menu_tables.aspGoogle Scholar
  • Venkatesan R, Kumar V. A customer lifetime value framework for customer selection and resource allocation strategy. J. Marketing (2004) 68(4):106–125CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Venkatesan R, Kumar V, Bohling T. Optimal customer relationship management using Bayesian decision theory: An application for customer selection. J. Marketing Res. (2007) 44(4):579–594CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wainer H. Shopping for colleges when what we know ain't. J. Consumer Res. (2005) 32(2):337–342CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wu T-H. A note on a global approach for general 0--1 fractional programming. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (1997) 101(1):220–223CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yu G. On the max-min 0-1 knapsack problem with robust optimization applications. Oper. Res. (1996) 44(2):407–415LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Zeithammer R, Lenk P. Bayesian estimation of multivariate-normal models when dimensions are absent. Quant. Marketing Econom. (2006) 4(3):241–265CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.