Consumer Learning of New Binary Attribute Importance Accounting for Priors, Bias, and Order Effects

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.1120.0719

References

  • Alba JW, Hutchinson JW. Knowledge calibration: What consumers know and what they think they know. J. Consumer Res. (2000) 27(2):123–156CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Alloy LB, Tabachnik N. Assessment of covariation by humans and animals: The joint influence of prior expectations and current situational information. Psych. Rev. (1984) 91(1):112–149CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Anderson JR, Lebiere C. The Atomic Components of Thought (1998) (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Bass FM, Bruce N, Majumdar S, Murthi BPS. Wearout effects of different advertising themes: A dynamic Bayesian model of advertising-sales relationship. Marketing Sci. (2007) 26(2):179–195LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bettman JR, Luce MF, Payne JW. Constructive consumer choice processes. J. Consumer Res. (1998) 25(3):187–217CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Blackorby C, Primont D, Russell RR. On testing separability restrictions with flexible functional forms. J. Econometrics (1977) 5(2):195–209CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bradlow ET, Hu Y, Ho T-H. Modeling behavioral regularities of consumer learning in conjoint analysis. J. Marketing Res. (2004) 41(4):392–396CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cason T, Friedman D. Learning in a laboratory market with random supply and demand. Experiment. Econom. (1999) 2(1):77–98CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chapman GB, Robbins SJ. Cue interaction in human contingency judgment. Memory Cognition (1990) 18(5):537–545CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cheng PW. From covariation to causation: A causal power theory. Psych. Rev. (1997) 104(2):367–405CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fader PS, McAlister L. An elimination by aspects model of consumer response to promotion calibrated on UPC scanner data. J. Marketing Res. (1990) 27(3):322–332CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fiske ST, Taylor SE. Social Cognition (1991) (McGraw-Hill, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gerber A, Green D. Misperceptions about perceptual bias. Annual Rev. Political Sci. (1999) 2:189–210CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gönül F, Srinivasan K. Estimating the impact of consumer expectations of coupons on purchase behavior: A dynamic structural model. Marketing Sci. (1996) 15(3):262–282LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Griffiths TL, Tenenbaum JB. Structure and strength in causal induction. Cognitive Psych. (2005) 51(4):354–384CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Guadagni PM, Little JDC. A logit model of brand choice calibrated on scanner data. Marketing Sci. (1983) 2(3):203–238LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hoch SJ, Deighton J. Managing what consumers learn from experience. J. Marketing (1989) 53(2):1–20CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hoeffler S, Ariely D. Constructing stable preferences: A look into dimensions of experience and their impact on preference stability. J. Consumer Psych. (1999) 8(2):113–139CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hoeffler S, Ariely D, West P. Path dependent preferences: The role of early experience and biased search in preference development. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (2006) 101(2):215–229CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Iyengar R, Ansari A, Gupta S. A model of consumer learning for service quality and usage. J. Marketing Res. (2007) 44(4):529–544CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Janiszewski C, van Osselaer SMJ. A connectionist model of brand-quality associations. J. Marketing Res. (2000) 37(3):331–350CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Janiszewski C, Warlop L. The influence of classical conditioning procedures on subsequent attention to the conditioned brand. J. Consumer Res. (1993) 20(2):171–189CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jedidi K, Mela CF, Gupta S. Managing advertising and promotion for long-run profitability. Marketing Sci. (1999) 18(1):1–22LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Johar GV, Jedidi K, Jacoby J. A varying parameter averaging model of on-line brand evaluations. J. Consumer Res. (1997) 24(2):232–248CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kahn BE, Meyer RJ. Consumer multiattribute judgments under attribute-weight uncertainty. J. Consumer Res. (1991) 17(4):508–522CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kahneman D, Tversky A. Prospect theory: An analysis of decisions under risk. Econometrica (1979) 47(2):263–292CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kardes FR, Posavac SS, Cronley ML. Consumer inference: A review of processes, bases, and judgment contexts. J. Consumer Psych. (2004) 14(3):230–256CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kayande U, Roberts JH, Lilien GL, Fong D. Mapping the bounds of incoherence: How far can you go and how does it affect your brand? Marketing Sci. (2007) 26(4):508–514LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Keeney RL, Raiffa H. Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs (1976) (John Wiley & Sons, New York) Google Scholar
  • Kennan J. The estimation of partial adjustment models with rational expectations. Econometrica (1979) 47(6):1441–1455CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kruschke JK. Locally Bayesian learning with applications to retrospective revaluation and highlighting. Psych. Rev. (2006) 113(4):677–699CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kuehn AA. An analysis of the dynamics of consumer behavior and its implications for marketing management. (1958) . Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Carnegie Institute of Technology, Carnegie Mellon University, PittsburghGoogle Scholar
  • Lancaster KJ. A new approach to consumer theory. J. Political Econom. (1966) 74(2):132–157CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lawson R. Consumer decision making within a goal-driven framework. Psych. Marketing (1997) 14(5):427–449CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lilien GL. A modified linear learning model of buyer behavior. Management Sci. (1974) 20(7):1027–1036LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lopez FJ, Cobos PL, Cano A, Shanks DR, Oaksford M, Chater N. The rational analysis of human and animal probability judgments. Rational Models of Cognition (1998a) (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK) 314–352Google Scholar
  • Lopez FJ, Shanks DR, Almaraz J, Fernandez P. Effects of trial order on association judgments: A comparison of associative and probabilistic contrast accounts. J. Experiment. Psych.: Learn., Memory, Cognition (1998b) 24(3):627–694Google Scholar
  • Lovett M, Anderson JR, Lebiere C. Choice: Elaborating ACT-R's theory of choice. The Atomic Components of Thought (1998) (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ) 255–296Google Scholar
  • Marsh JK, Ahn W. Order effects in association learning: The role of task complexity. Memory Cognition (2006) 34(3):568–576CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Massy WF, Montgomery DB, Morrison DG. Stochastic Models of Buying Behavior (1970) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • McFadden D. Economic choices. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2001) 91(3):351–379CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McGough B. Statistical learning with time-varying parameters. Macroeconomic Dynam. (2003) 7(1):119–139CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Miller RR, Matzel LD, Bower GH. The comparator hypothesis: A response rule for the expression of associations. The Psychology of Learning and Motivation (1988) 22(Academic Press, San Diego) 51–92Google Scholar
  • Pearce JM. Similarity and discrimination: A selective review and a connectionist model. Psych. Rev. (1994) 101(4):587–607CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pleskac TJ. Decision making and learning while taking sequential risks. J. Experiment. Psych.: Learn., Memory, Cognition (2008) 34(1):167–185CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Price PC, Yates JF. Judgmental overshadowing: Further evidence of cue interaction in contingency judgment. Memory Cognition (1993) 21(5):561–572CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rescorla RA, Wagner AR, Black AH, Prokasy WF. A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement. Classical Conditioning II (1972) (Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York) 64–99Google Scholar
  • Ries A, Trout J. The 22 Immutable Laws of Marketing (1994) (HarperCollins, London) Google Scholar
  • Roberts JH, Urban GL. Modeling multi-attribute utility, risk, and belief dynamics for new consumer durable brand choice. Management Sci. (1988) 34(2):167–185LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Schooler LJ, Raaijmakers JGW, Shiffrin RM. A Bayesian model of implicit effects in perceptual identification. Psych. Rev. (2001) 108(1):257–272CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shanks DR, Charles D, Darby RJ, Azmi A. Configural processes in human associative learning. J. Experiment. Psych.: Learn., Memory, Cognition (1998) 24(6):1353–1378CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Simonson I, Tversky A. Choice in context: Tradeoff contrast and extremeness aversion. J. Marketing Res. (1992) 29(3):281–295CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sood A, Tellis GJ. Technological evolution and radical innovation. J. Marketing (2005) 69(3):152–168CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • van Osselaer SMJ, Alba JW. Consumer learning and brand equity. J. Consumer Res. (2000) 27(1):1–16CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • van Osselaer SMJ, Alba JW. Locus of equity and brand extension. J. Consumer Res. (2003) 29(4):539–550CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • van Osselaer SMJ, Janiszewski C. Two ways of learning brand associations. J. Consumer Res. (2001) 28(2):202–223CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wallsten T, Pleskac T, Lejuez C. Modeling behavior in a clinically diagnostic sequential risk-taking task. Psych. Rev. (2005) 112(4):862–880CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wasserman EA, Miller RR. What's elementary about associative learning? Annual Rev. Psych. (1997) 48:573–607CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Xiao B, Benbasat I. E-commerce product recommendations: Use, characteristics, and impact. MIS Quart. (2007) 31(1):137–209CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.