Consumer Deliberation and Product Line Design

References

• Bar-Isaac H, Caruana G, Cuñat V. Information gathering and marketing. J. Econom. Management Strategy (2010) 19(2):375–401Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bertini M, Wathieu L, Iyengar SS. The discriminating consumer: Product proliferation and willingness to pay for quality. J. Marketing Res. (2012) 49(1):39–49Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bhardwaj P, Chen Y, Godes D. Buyer-initiated vs. seller-initiated information revelation. Management Sci. (2008) 54(6):1104–1114Link, Google Scholar
• Bradlow ET, Hu Y, Ho T-H. A learning-based model of imputing missing levels in partial conjoint profiles. J. Marketing Res. (2004) 41(4):369–381Crossref, Google Scholar
• Desai PS. Quality segmentation in spatial markets: When does cannibalization affect product line design? Marketing Sci. (2001) 20(3):265–283Link, Google Scholar
• Desai P, Kekre S, Radhakrishnan S, Srinivasan K. Product differentiation and commonality in design: Balancing revenue and cost drivers. Management Sci. (2001) 47(1):37–51Link, Google Scholar
• Ding M, Park Y-H, Bradlow ET. Barter markets for conjoint analysis. Management Sci. (2009) 55(6):1003–1017Link, Google Scholar
• Ding M, Hauser J, Dong S, Dzyabura D, Yang Z, Su C, Gaskin S. Unstructured direct elicitation of decision rules. J. Marketing Res. (2011) 48(1):116–127Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dzyabura D. Recommending products as consumers learn their preferences through product experience. (2012) . Working paper, New York University, New YorkGoogle Scholar
• Festinger L. A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance (1957) (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Green PE. On the design of choice experiments involving multifactor alternatives. J. Consumer Res. (1974) 1(2):61–68Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guo L, Iyer G. Information acquisition and sharing in a vertical relationship. Marketing Sci. (2010) 29(3):483–506Link, Google Scholar
• Hauser JR, Wernerfelt B. An evaluation cost model of consideration sets. J. Consumer Res. (1990) 16:393–408Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hauser JR, Dong S, Ding M. Self-reflection and articulated consumer preferences. J. Product Innovation Management (2012) . ForthcomingGoogle Scholar
• Iyer G, Kuksov D. Consumer feelings and equilibrium product quality. J. Econom. Management Strategy (2010) 19(1):137–168Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahn BE, Meyer RJ. Consumer multiattribute judgments under attribute-weight uncertainty. J. Consumer Res. (1991) 17(4):508–552Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kuksov D, Lin Y. Information provision in a vertically differentiated competitive marketplace. Marketing Sci. (2010) 29(1):122–138Link, Google Scholar
• Kuksov D, Villas-Boas JM. When more alternatives lead to less choice. Marketing Sci. (2010) 29(3):507–524Link, Google Scholar
• Lewis TR, Sappington DEM. Supplying information to facilitate price discrimination. Internat. Econom. Rev. (1994) 35(2):309–307Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lichtenstein S, Slovic P. The Construction of Preference (2006) (Cambridge University Press, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Cui TH. The length of product line in distribution channels. Marketing Sci. (2010) 29(3):474–482Link, Google Scholar
• Moorthy KS. Market segmentation, self-selection, and product line design. Marketing Sci. (1984) 3(4):288–307Link, Google Scholar
• Mussa M, Rosen S. Monopoly and product quality. J. Econom. Theory (1978) 18(2):301–307Crossref, Google Scholar
• Orhun AY. Optimal product line design when consumers exhibit choice set-dependent preferences. Marketing Sci. (2009) 28(5):868–886Link, Google Scholar
• Payne JW, Bettman JR, Johnson EJ. Adaptive strategy selection in decision making. J. Experiment. Psych.: Learn., Memory, Cognition (1988) 14(3):534–552Crossref, Google Scholar
• Payne JW, Bettman JR, Johnson EJ. The Adaptive Decision Maker (1993) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shugan SM. The cost of thinking. J. Consumer Res. (1980) 7(2):99–111Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simester D, Zhang J. Why are bad products so hard to kill? Management Sci. (2010) 56(7):1161–1179Link, Google Scholar
• Simonson I. Will I like a “medium” pillow? Another look at constructed and inherent preferences. J. Consumer Psych. (2008) 18(3):155–169Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stole LA, Armstrong M, Porter RH. Price discrimination and competition. Handbook of Industrial Organization (2007) 3(Elsevier, Amsterdam) 2221–2300Google Scholar
• Tesser A, Martin LL, Mendolia M, Petty RE, Krosnick JA. The impact of thought on attitude extremity and attitude-behavior consistency. Attitude Strength: Antecedents and Consequences (1995) (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ) 73–92Google Scholar
• Tversky A, Simonson I. Context-dependent preferences. Management Sci. (1993) 39(10):1179–1189Link, Google Scholar
• Villas-Boas JM. Product line design for a distribution channel. Management Sci. (1998) 17(2):156–169Abstract, Google Scholar
• Villas-Boas JM. Communication strategies and product line design. Marketing Sci. (2004) 23(3):304–316Link, Google Scholar
• Villas-Boas JM. Product variety and endogenous pricing with evaluation costs. Management Sci. (2009) 55(8):1338–1346Link, Google Scholar
• Wathieu L, Bertini M. Price as a stimulus to think: The case for willful overpricing. Marketing Sci. (2007) 26(1):118–129Link, Google Scholar
• Wathieu L, Brenner L, Carmon Z, Chattopadhyay A, Wertenbroch K, Drolet A, Gourville J, et al. Consumer control and empowerment: A primer. Marketing Lett. (2002) 13(3):297–305Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wernerfelt B. Selling formats for search goods. Marketing Sci. (1994) 13(3):298–309Link, Google Scholar
• Wernerfelt B. A rational reconstruction of the compromise effect: Using market data to infer utilities. J. Consumer Res. (1995) 21(4):627–633Crossref, Google Scholar