Firm Innovation and the Ratchet Effect Among Consumer Packaged Goods Firms

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.1120.0737

References

  • Arellano M, Bond S. Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Rev. Econom. Stud. (1991) 58(2):227–297CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Axarloglou K. The cyclicality of new product introductions. J. Bus. (2003) 76(1):29–48CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bebchuk LA, Stole LA. Do short-term objectives lead to under- or overinvestment in long-term projects? J. Finance (1993) 48(2):719–729CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Berliner JS. A problem in Soviet business administration. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1956) 1(1):86–101CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bizjak JM, Brickley JA, Coles JL. Stock-based incentive compensation and investment behavior. J. Accounting Econom. (1993) 16(1–3):349–372CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brandenburger A, Polak B. When managers cover their posteriors: Making decisions the market wants to see. RAND J. Econom. (1996) 27(3):523–541CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brav A, Gompers P. Myth or reality? The long-run underperformance of initial public offerings: Evidence from venture and non-venture-backed companies. J. Finance (1997) 52(5):1791–1821CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Carhart MM. On persistence in mutual fund performance. J. Finance (1997) 52(1):57–82CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chakravarty A, Grewal R. The stock market in the driver’s seat! Implications for R&D and marketing. Management Sci. (2011) 57(9):1594–1609LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chaney PK, Devinney TM, Winer RS. The impact of new product introductions on the market value of firms. J. Bus. (1991) 64(4):573–610CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chapman CJ, Steenburgh TJ. An investigation of earnings management through marketing actions. Management Sci. (2010) 57(1):72–92LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Demirakos EG, Strong NC, Walker M. What valuation models do analysts use? Accounting Horizons (2004) 18(4):221–240CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Deshpandé R, Farley JU, Webster FE. Corporate culture, customer orientation, and innovativeness in Japanese firms: A quadrad analysis. J. Marketing (1993) 57(1):23–37CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eberhart AC, Maxwell WF, Siddique AR. An examination of long-term abnormal stock returns and operating performance following R&D increases. J. Finance (2004) 59(2):623–650CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Erickson G, Jacobson R. Gaining comparative advantage through discretionary expenditures: The returns to R&D and advertising. Management Sci. (1992) 38(9):1264–1279LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Fama EF. Foundations of Finance (1976) (Basic Books, New York) Google Scholar
  • Fama EF, French K. Common risk factors in the returns of stocks and bonds. J. Financial Econom. (1993) 33(1):3–55CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gielens K, Steenkamp JBEM. Drivers of consumer acceptance of new packaged goods: An investigation across products and countries. Internat. J. Res. Marketing (2007) 24(2):97–111CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Graham JR, Harvey CR, Rajgopal S. The economic implications of corporate financial reporting. J. Accounting Econom. (2005) 40(1–3):3–73CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gupta S, Lehmann DR, Stuart JA. Valuing customers. J. Marketing Res. (2004) 41(1):7–18CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hauser J, Tellis GJ, Griffin A. Research on innovation: A review and agenda for Marketing Science. Marketing Sci. (2006) 25(6):687–717LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Jacobson R, Mizik N. The financial markets and customer satisfaction: Reexamining possible financial market mispricing of customer satisfaction. Marketing Sci. (2009) 28(5):810–819LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Jaffe JF. Special information and insider trading. J. Bus. (1974) 47(3):410–428CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jensen MC. The performance of mutual funds in the period 1945–1964. J. Finance (1968) 23(2):389–416CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kohli AK, Jaworski BJ. Market orientation: The construct, research propositions, and managerial implications. J. Marketing (1990) 54(2):1–18CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Laffont JJ, Tirole J. The dynamics of incentive contracts. Econometrica (1988) 56(5):1153–1175CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lambert RA. Income smoothing as rational equilibrium behavior. Accounting Rev. (1984) 59(4):604–618Google Scholar
  • Lilien G, Yoon E. The timing of competitive market entry: An exploratory study of new industrial products. Management Sci. (1990) 36(5):568–585LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Markovitch DG, Golder PN. Using stock prices to predict market events: Evidence on sales takeoff and long-term firm survival. Marketing Sci. (2008) 27(4):699–716LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Markovitch DG, Steckel JH, Yeung B. Using capital markets as market intelligence: Evidence from the pharmaceutical industry. Management Sci. (2005) 51(10):1467–1480LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Matsumoto DA. Management’s incentives to avoid negative earnings surprises. Accounting Rev. (2002) 77(3):483–514CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Milgrom P, Roberts J. Economics, Organization, and Management (1992) (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company Building an even stronger 3M: 2001 annual report. (2001) . Report, 3M, St. Paul, MN. http://media.corporate-ir.net/media_files/NYS/MMM/reports/3M_01ar.pdfGoogle Scholar
  • Mizik N. The theory and practice of myopic management. J. Marketing Res. (2010) 47(4):549–611CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mizik N, Jacobson R. Myopic marketing management: Evidence of the phenomenon and its long-term performance consequences in the SEO context. Marketing Sci. (2007) 26(3):361–379LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Mizik N, Jacobson R. Valuing branded business. J. Marketing (2009) 73(6):137–153CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Moorman C, Rust RT. The role of marketing. J. Marketing (1999) 63(Special issue):180–197CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Moorthy KS, Png IPL. Market segmentation, cannibalization, and the timing of product introductions. Management Sci. (1992) 38(3):568–585LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Pauwels K, Silva-Risso J, Srinivasan S, Hanssens DM. New products, sales promotions, and firm value: The case of the automobile industry. J. Marketing (2004) 68(4):142–156CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pauwels K, Currim I, Dekimpe MG, Ghysels E, Hanssens DM, Mizik N, Naik P. Modeling marketing dynamics by time series econometrics. Marketing Lett. (2005) 15(4):167–183CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Putsis WP. Why put off until tomorrow what you can do today: Incentives and the timing of new product introduction. J. Product Innovation Management (1993) 10(3):195–204CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Roychowdhury S. Earnings management through real activity manipulation. J. Accounting Econom. (2006) 42(3):335–370CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rust RT, Ambler T, Carpenter GS, Kumar V, Srivastava RK. Measuring marketing productivity: Current knowledge and future directions. J. Marketing (2004) 68(4):76–89CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schoar A. Effects of corporate diversification on productivity. J. Finance (2002) 57(6):2379–2403CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sood A, Tellis GJ. Do innovations really pay off? Total stock market returns to innovation. Marketing Sci. (2009) 28(3):442–456LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Sorescu A, Spanjol J. Innovation’s effect on firm value and risk: Insights from consumer packaged goods. J. Marketing (2008) 72(2):114–132CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sorescu A, Chandy RK, Prabhu JC. Sources and financial consequences of radical innovation: Insights from pharmaceuticals. J. Marketing (2003) 67(4):82–101CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sorescu A, Shankar V, Kushwaha T. New product preannouncements and shareholder value: Don’t make promises you can’t keep. J. Marketing Res. (2007) 44(3):468–489CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Srinivasan S, Hanssens DM. Marketing and firm value: Metrics, methods, findings, and future directions. J. Marketing Res. (2009) 46(3):293–312CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Srinivasan S, Pauwels K, Silva-Risso J, Hanssens DM. Product innovations, advertising, and stock returns. J. Marketing (2009) 73(1):24–43CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Srivastava RK, Shervani TA, Fahey L. Market-based assets and shareholder value: A framework for analysis. J. Marketing (1998) 62(1):2–18CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tirole J. The Theory of Industrial Organization (1988) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Trueman B. The relationship between the level of capital expenditures and firm value. J. Financial Quant. Anal. (1986) 21(2):115–129CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Vorhies DW, Morgan NA. Benchmarking marketing capabilities for sustainable competitive advantage. J. Marketing (2005) 69(1):80–94CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Weitzman ML. The “ratchet” principle and performance incentives. Bell J. Econom. (1980) 11(1):302–308CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.