Collaborating to Compete

References

  • Amaldoss W. Collaborating to compete: A game-theoretical model and experimental investigation of the effect of profit-sharing arrangement and type of alliance. (1998) . Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA Google Scholar
  • Bleeke J. , Ernst D. The way to win in cross-border alliances. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1991) 69 127 135 Google Scholar
  • Bucklin L. P. , Sengupta S. Organizing successful co-marketing alliance. J. Marketing (1993) 57 32 46 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Camerer C. , Ho T. Experience-weighted attraction learning in normal form games. Econometrica (1999) 87 827 874 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cooper R. , DeJong D. V. , Forsythe R. , Ross T. W. Selection criteria in coordination games: Some experimental results. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1990) 80 218 33 Google Scholar
  • Cooper R. , DeJong D. V. , Forsythe R. , Ross T. W. Cooperation without reputation: Experimental evidence from prisoner's dilemma games. Games Econom. Behavior (1996) 12 187 218 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dawes R. M. Social Dilemmas. Ann. Rev. Psych. (1980) 31 169 193 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dawes R. M. , Thaler R. Anomalies: Cooperation. J. Econom. Perspect. (1988) 2 187 197 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Deneckere R. , Peck J. Competition over price and service rate when demand is stochastic: A strategic analysis. RAND J. Econom. (1995) 26 1 148 162 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dreyfuss J. , Rapoport C. , Shendler B. , Calonius E. , Bylinsky G. , Shapiro D. , Alpert M. , Moore A. , Neumeier S. , Kirsch S. Ideas for the 1990s: Today's leaders look to tomorrow. Fortune (1990) 121 7 68 96 . March Google Scholar
  • Dutta S. , Weiss A. M. The relationship between a firm's level of technological innovativeness and its pattern of partnership agreements. Management Sci. (1997) 43 343 356 LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Erev I. , Rapoport A. Coordination, “magic,” and reinforcement learning in a market entry game. Games Econom. Behav. (1998) 23 146 175 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Farell J. , Saloner G. Coordination through committees and markets. RAND J. Econom. (1988) 19 2 235 251 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Forsythe R. , Horowitz J. , Savin N. , Sefton M. Replicability, fairness and pay in experiments with simple bargaining games. Games Econom. Behav. 6 347 369 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fudenberg D. , Gilbert R. , Stiglitz J. , Tirole J. Preemption, leap-frogging and competition in patent races. Euro. Econom. Rev. (1983) 22 3 31 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fudenberg D. , Tirole J. Preemption and rent equalization in the adoption of new technology. Rev. Econom. Studies (1985) 52 383 401 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gilbert R. , Newberry D. Preemptive patenting and the persistence of monopoly. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1982) 72 514 526 Google Scholar
  • Gomes-Casseres B. Group versus group: How alliance networks compete. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1994) 72 62 74 Google Scholar
  • Hamel G. Competition for competence and interpartner learning within international strategic alliances. Strategic Management J. (1991) 12 83 103 . Special Issue CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Harrigan K. R. Joint ventures and competitive strategy. Strategic Management J. (1988) 9 141 158 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Harsanyi J. Games with randomly disturbed payoffs: A new rationale for mixed strategy equilibrium points. Internat. J. Game Theory (1973) 2 1 23 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Henderson C. Conference coverage (NCVDG) researchers bullish as NAID reveals AIDS vaccine strategy. Blood Weekly (1996) . Feb 26 Google Scholar
  • Hoffman E. , McCabe K. , Shachat K. , Smith V. L. Preferences, property rights and anonymity in bargaining games. (1993) . Working Paper, Department of Economics, University of Arizona, City, State (AZ) Google Scholar
  • Isaac R. M. , Walker J. Group size effects in provision of public goods: The voluntary contribution mechanism. Quart J. Econom. (1988) 103 179 199 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kogut B. Joint ventures: Theoretical and empirical perspectives. Strategic Management J. (1988) 9 319 332 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McKelvey R. , Palfrey T. An experimental study of centipede game. Econometrica (1992) 60 803 836 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mody A. Learning through alliances. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. (1993) 29 151 170 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mookherjee D. , Sopher B. Learning and decision costs in experimental constant sum games. Games Econom. Behav. (1997) 19 97 132 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Narasimhan C. Competitive promotional strategies. J. Bus. (1988) October 427 450 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • O'Neill B. A non-metric test of the minimax theory of two-person zerosum games. Proc. National Acad. Sci. (1987) 84 2106 2109 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Oechssler J. An evolutionary interpretation of mixed strategy equilibria. Games Econom. Behav. (1997) 21 203 237 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pisano G. P. , Russo M. V. , Teece D. J. , Mowery D. Joint ventures and collaborative agreements in the telecommunications equipment industry. International Collaborative Ventures in U.S. Manufacturing (1988) (Ballinger, Cambridge, MA) 23 70 Google Scholar
  • Raju J. S. , Srinivasan V. , Lal R. The effects of brand loyalty on competitive price promotional strategies. Management Sci. (1990) 36 276 304 LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Rao R. C. Pricing and promotions in asymmetric duopoly. Marketing Sci. (1990) 10 131 144 LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Rapoport A. Research paradigms and expected utility models for provision of step-level public goods. Psych. Rev. (1987) 94 74 83 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rapoport A. , Amaldoss W. Mixed strategies and iterative elimination of strongly dominated strategies: An experimental investigation of states of knowledge. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. . forthcoming Google Scholar
  • Rapoport A. , Boebel R. B. Mixed strategies in strictly competitive games: A further test of the minimax hypothesis. Games Econom. Behav. (1992) 4 261 283 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rapoport A. , Budescu D. V. Generation of random series by humans: A two-person zerosum game paradigm. J. Experiment. Psych. General (1992) 121 352 363 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Robertson T. S. , Gatignon H. Technology development mode: A transaction cost conceptualization. Strategic Management J. (1998) 19 515 531 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rosenthal R. Sequences of games with varying opponents. Econometrica (1979) 47 1353 1366 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Roth A. , Erev I. Learning in extensive form games: Experimental data and simple dynamic models in the intermediate term. Games Econom. Behav. (1995) 8 164 212 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Smith V. L. Markets as economizers of information: Experimental investigation of Hayek's hypothesis. Econom. Inquiry (1982) 20 165 179 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shubik M. The dollar auction game: A paradox in noncooperative behavior and escalation. J. Conflict Resolution (1971) 15 545 547 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Treisman M. , Faulkner A. Generation of random sequences by human subjects: Cognitive operations or psychological processes? J. Experiment. Psych. General (1987) 116 337 355 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Van Huyck J. B. , Battalio R. C. , Beil R. O. Tacit coordination games, strategic uncertainty, and coordination failure. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1990) 80 234 248 Google Scholar
  • Wagenaar W. Generation of random sequences by human subjects: A critical survey of the literature. Psychological Bull. (1972) 77 65 72 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Weinstein D. Intel inside. (1994) . INSEAD Case, No. 594-038-1, INSEAD, Fontainebleau, France Google Scholar
  • Williamson O. E. The Economic Institutions of Capitalism (1985) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Yoshino M. Y. , Rangan U. S. Strategic Alliances: An Entrepreneurial Approach to Globalization (1995) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.