Looking for Loss Aversion in Scanner Panel Data: The Confounding Effect of Price Response Heterogeneity
Published Online:1 May 2000https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.19.2.185.11802
References
- On the heterogeneity of demand. J. Marketing Res. (1998) 35 August 384 389 Crossref, Google Scholar
- Similarities in choice behavior across multiple categories. Marketing Sci. (1998) 17 2 91 106 Link, Google Scholar
- The role of internal reference points in the category purchase decision. J. Consumer Res. (1999) 26 September 128 143 Crossref, Google Scholar
- The decomposition of promotional response: an empirical generalization. Marketing Sci. (1999) 18 4 504 526 Link, Google Scholar
- A comparative analysis of reference price models. J. Consumer Res. (1997) 24 September 202 214 Crossref, Google Scholar
- . Brand choice, purchase incidence, and segmentation: an integrated modeling approach. J. Marketing Res. (1992) 29 May 201 215 Crossref, Google Scholar
- The impact of heterogeneity in purchase timing and price responsiveness on estimates of sticker shock effects. Marketing Sci. (1999) 18 2 178 190 Link, Google Scholar
- The price knowledge of supermarket shoppers. J. Marketing (1990) 54 July 42 53 Crossref, Google Scholar
- Modeling consumer choice among SKUs. J. Marketing Res (1996) 33 November 442 452 Crossref, Google Scholar
- Estimating nonlinear parameters in the multinomial logit model. Marketing Sci. (1992) 11 2 372 385 Link, Google Scholar
- . The impact of reference price effects on the profitability of price promotions. Marketing Sci. (1994) 14 Winter 82 104 Google Scholar
- A logit model of brand choice calibrated on scanner data. Marketing Sci. (1983) 2 Summer 203 238 Link, Google Scholar
- Modeling loss aversion and reference dependence effects on brand choice. Marketing Sci. (1993) 12 Fall 378 394 Link, Google Scholar
- . Adaptation-Level Theory (1964) (Harper and Row, New York) Google Scholar
- The endowment effect, loss aversion and status quo bias. J. Economic Perspectives (1991) 17 Winter 193 206 Crossref, Google Scholar
- Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica (1979) 47 March 263 291 Crossref, Google Scholar
- . A price expectations model of customer brand choice. J. Marketing Res. (1990) 27 August 251 262 Crossref, Google Scholar
- An empirical analysis of the latitude of price acceptance in consumer packaged goods. J. Consumer Res. (1994) 21 December 408 418 Crossref, Google Scholar
- Empirical generalizations from reference price research. Marketing Sci. (1995) 14 Summer G161 G169 Link, Google Scholar
- A probabilistic choice model for market segmentation and elasticity structure. J. Marketing Res. (1989) 26 November 379 390 Crossref, Google Scholar
- . Asymmetric reference pricing effects and dynamic pricing policies. Marketing Sci. (1996) 15 1 60 85 Link, Google Scholar
- Asymmetric response to price in consumer choice and purchase quantity decisions. J. Consumer Res. (1992) 19 December 387 400 Crossref, Google Scholar
- Reference effects of price and promotion on brand choice behavior. J. Marketing Res. (1989) 26 August 299 310 Crossref, Google Scholar
- . Stochastic Models of Buying Behavior (1970) (The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
- An empirical analysis of internal and external reference prices using scanner data. J. Consumer Res. (1992) 19 June 62 70 Crossref, Google Scholar
- Empirical generalizations in the modeling of consumer choice. Marketing Sci. (1995) 14 Summer G180 G189 Link, Google Scholar
- . Incorporating reference price effects into a theory of consumer choice. Marketing Sci. (1992) 11 Summer 287 309 Link, Google Scholar
- Contextual and temporal components of reference price. J. Marketing (1994) 58 January 22 34 Crossref, Google Scholar
- Investigating household state dependence effects across categories. J. Marketing Res. (1999) 36 November 488 500 Crossref, Google Scholar
- Loss aversion and riskless choice: a reference-dependent model. Quart. J. Economics (1991) 106 November 1039 1061 Crossref, Google Scholar
- A reference price model of brand choice for frequently purchased consumer products. J. Consumer Res. (1986) 13 September 250 256 Crossref, Google Scholar

