Experimental Evidence for Agency Models of Salesforce Compensation

References

• Amershi Amin H., Butterworth James, Felthan G., Amershi A., Ziemba W. Explorations in the theory of single and multiple agent agencies. Economic Analysis of Information and Contracts (1988) (Kluwer-Nijhoff Publishing, Boston, MA) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Basu Amiya K. A study on optimal salesperson compensation plans. (1983) . Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Graduate School of Business, Stanford University, Stanford, CAGoogle Scholar
• Basu Amiya K., Lal Rajiv, Srinivasan V., Staelin Richard. A theory of salesforce compensation plans. Marketing Sci. (1985) 4(Fall):267–291Link, Google Scholar
• Berg Joyce E., Daley Lane, Dickhaut John, O'Brien John. Controlling preferences for lotteries on units of experimental exchange. Quart. J. Econom. (1986) 101(1):281–306Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berg Joyce E., Daley Lane, Dickhaut John, O'Brien John, Isaac R. M. Moral hazard and risk sharing: Experimental evidence. Research in Experimental Economics (1992) 5(JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) 1–34Google Scholar
• Berg Joyce E., Dickhaut John, McCabe Kevin. Trust, reciprocity, and social history. (1994) . Working Paper, Accounting Department, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MNGoogle Scholar
• Coughlan Anne T., Narasimhan Chakravarti. An empirical analysis of salesforce compensation plans. J. Bus. (1992) 65(1):93–121Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dutta Shantanu, Bergen Mark E., John George. The governance of exclusive territories when dealers can bootleg. Marketing Sci. (1994) 13(Winter):83–99Link, Google Scholar
• Epstein Seth, Isaac R. M. Testing principal-agency theory. Research in Experimental Economics (1992) 5(JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) 35–60Google Scholar
• Forsythe Robert, Horowitz Joel L., Savin N. E., Sefton Martin. Fairness in simple bargaining experiments. Games Econom. Behavior (1994) 6:347–369Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grossman Sanford J., Hart Oliver D. The cost and benefits of ownership: A theory of vertical and lateral integration. J. Political Econom. (1986) 94:691–719Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holmstrom Bengt. Moral hazard and observability. Bell J. Econom. (1979) 10:180–191Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holmstrom Bengt, Milgrom Paul. Multi-task principal-agent analyses: Incentive contracts, asset ownership and job design. J. Law, Econom. Organ. (1991) 7:24–52Crossref, Google Scholar
• John George, Weitz Barton A. Explaining variation in sales compensation plans: Empirical evidence for the Basu et al. model. (1988) . Working Paper, Marketing Department, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MNGoogle Scholar
• John George, Weitz Barton A. Salesforce compensation: An empirical investigation of factors related to the use of salary versus incentive compensation. J. Marketing Res. (1989) 26(1):1–14Crossref, Google Scholar
• Joseph Kissan, Kalwani Manohar U. The impactof environmental uncertainty on the design of salesforce compensation plans. Marketing Lett. (1995) 6(3):183–197Crossref, Google Scholar
• Joseph Kissan, Thevaranjan Alex. Monitoring and incentives in sales organizations: An agency-theoretic perspective. Marketing Sci. (1998) 17(Spring):107–123Link, Google Scholar
• Lafontaine Francine, Slade Margaret, Chatterjee K., Samuelson W. Incentive contracting and the franchise decision. Advances in Business Applications of Game Theory (1998) (Kluwer Academic Press, Boston) . (Forthcoming)Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lal Rajiv. A theory of salesforce compensation plans. (1982) . Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Graduate School of Industrial Administration, Carnegie-Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PAGoogle Scholar
• Lal Rajiv, Outland Donald, Staelin Richard. Salesforce compensation plans: An individual-level analysis. Marketing Letters (1994) 5(2):117–130Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lal Rajiv, Staelin Richard. Salesforce compensation plans in environments with asymmetric information. Marketing Sci. (1986) 5(Summer):179–198Link, Google Scholar
• Mantrala Murali K., Sinha Prabhakant, Zoltners Andris A. Structuring a multi-product quota bonus plan for a heterogeneous sales force: A practical model-based approach. Marketing Sci. (1994) 13(Spring):122–144Google Scholar
• Oliver Richard, Weitz Barton A. The effects of risk preference, perceived uncertainty, and incentive compensation on salesperson motivation. (1989) . Working Paper, Marketing Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, FLGoogle Scholar
• Padmanabhan V., Rao Ram C. Warranty policy and extended service contracts: Theory and an application to automobiles. Marketing Sci. (1993) 12(Summer):230–247Link, Google Scholar
• Peck Charles. Compensating Field Sales Representatives (1982) (The Conference Board, New York, NY) Google Scholar
• Prasnikar Vesna. Binary lottery payoffs: Do they control risk aversion? (1993) . Discussion Paper, Center for Mathematical Studies in Economics and Management Science, Northwestern University, Evanston, ILGoogle Scholar
• Rietz Thomas A. Implementing and testing risk-preference induction mechanisms in experimental sealed-bid auctions. J. Risk Uncertainty (1993) 7:199–213Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roth Alvin E., Kagel J. H., Roth A. E. Introduction to experimental economics. The Handbook of Experimental Economics (1995) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) 3–98Google Scholar
• Roth Alvin E., Malou Michael W. K. Game-theoretic models and the role of information in bargaining. Psych. Rev. (1979) 86:574–594Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simonson Itamar. Choice based on reasons: The case of attraction and compromise effects. J. Consumer Res. (1989) 16:158–174Crossref, Google Scholar
• Staelin Richard. Personal communication (1998) Google Scholar
• Umanath Narayan S., Ray M. R., Campbell T. L. The impact of perceived environmental uncertainty and perceived agent effectiveness on the composition of compensation contracts. Management Sci. (1993) 39(January):32–45Link, Google Scholar
• Umanath Narayan S., Ray M. R., Campbell T. L. The effect of uncertainty and information asymmetry on the structure of compensation contracts: A test of competing models. Management Sci. (1996) 42(June):868–874Link, Google Scholar