Competitive Pricing Behavior in the Auto Market: A Structural Analysis

References

• Bernheim B. D., Whinston M. D. Multimarket contact and collusive behavior. Rand J. Econom. (1990) 21(1):1–26Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berry S. Estimating discrete-choice models of product differentiation. Rand J. Econom. (1994) 25(2):242–262Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berry S., Levinsohn J., Pakes A. Automobile prices in market equilibrium. Econometrica (1995) 63(4):841–890Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berry S., Levinsohn J., Pakes A.Differentiated products demand systems from a combination of micro and macro data: The new car market (1998) (NBER). Working paper No. W6481Google Scholar
• Besanko D., Dranove D., Shanley M.The Economics of Strategy (1996) (John Wiley and Sons, New York) Google Scholar
• Besanko D., Gupta S., Jain D. Logit demand estimation under competitive pricing behavior: An equilibrium framework. Management Sci. (1998) 44(11):1533–1547Link, Google Scholar
• Boulding W., Staelin R. A look on the cost side: Market share and the competitive environment. Marketing Sci. (1993) 12(2):144–166Link, Google Scholar
• Boulding W., Staelin R. Identifying generalizable effects of strategic actions on firm performance: The case of demand-side returns to RD spending. Marketing Sci. (1995) 14:G222–G236Link, Google Scholar
• Bresnahan T. Departures from marginal cost pricing in the American automobile industry. J. Econometrics (1981) 11:201–227Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bresnahan T. Competition and collusion in the American automobile industry: The 1955 price war. J. Indust. Econom. (1987) 35(4):457–482Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bresnahan T., Schmalensee R., Willig R. Industries and market power. Handbook of Industrial Organization (1989) (North Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) Google Scholar
• Bresnahan T., Stern S., Trajtenberg M. Market segmentation and the sources of rents from innovation: Personal computers in the 1980s. Rand J. Econom. (1997) 28(0):S17–44Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carlton D. W., Perloff J. M.Modern Industrial Organization (1994) 2nd ed.(Addison Wesley, New York) Google Scholar
• Caves R. E., Porter M. E. Market structure, oligopoly, and stability of market shares. J. Indust. Econom. (1978) 24:289–313Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edid M., Hamption W. J., Treece J. B. Autos: Detroit vs. Japan: Now what is the problem?. Bus. Week (1986) September1Google Scholar
• Erdem T. A dynamic analysis of market structure based on panel data. Marketing Sci. (1997) 15(4):359–378Link, Google Scholar
• Feenstra R., Levinsohn J. Estimating markets and market conduct with multidimensional product attributes. Rev. Econom. Stud. (1995) 62:19–52Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gasmi F., Laffont J. J., Vuong Q. Econometric analysis of collusive behavior in a soft drink market. J. Econom. Management Strategy (1992) 1(2):277–311Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goldberg P. Imperfect competition in international markets: The case of the U.S. automobile industry. Econometrica (1995) 63(4):891–951Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hamilton J. D.Time Series Analysis (1994) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hansen L. P., Heaton J., Yaron A. Finite sample properties of some alternative GMM estimators. J. Bus. Econom. Statist. (1996) 14(3):262–280Google Scholar
• Hanssens D. M. Market response, competitive behavior and time series analysis. J. Marketing Res. (1980) 17:470–485Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heider F.The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations (1958) (Wiley, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Horsky D., Nelson P. New brand positioning and pricing in an oligopolistic market. Marketing Sci. (1992) 11(2):133–153Link, Google Scholar
• Kadiyali V. Entry,its deterrence and its accommodation: A study of the U. S. photographic film industry. Rand J. Econom. (1996) 27(3):452–478Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kadiyali V., Sudhir K., Rao V. R. Structural analysis of competitive behavior: New empirical industrial organization methods in marketing. Internat. J. Res. Marketing (2000) Google Scholar
• Klemperer P. Markets with consumer switching costs. Quart. J. Econom. (1987) 102(2):375–394Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lancaster K. J.Consumer Demand: A New Approach (1971) (Columbia University Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Leeflang P. S. H., Wittink D. R. Diagnosing competitive reactions using (aggregated) scanner data. Internat. J. Res. Marketing (1992) 9(1):39–57Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leeflang P. S. H., Wittink D. R. Competitive reaction versus consumer response: Do managers overreact?. Internat. J. Res. Marketing (1996) 13:103–119Crossref, Google Scholar
• Los Angeles Times Autos: Big 3 outscore foreign car makers in owner-loyalty study. The Los Angeles Times (1996) June21Google Scholar
• Motor Vehicles Manufacturers AssocationMVMA Motor Vehicles Facts and Figures (1990) (MVMA, Detroit, MI) Google Scholar
• Nelder J. A., Mead R. A simplex method for function minimization. Comput. J. (1965) 7:308–313Crossref, Google Scholar
• Newey W., West K. Hypothesis testing with efficient method of moments estimation. Internat. Econom. Rev. (1987) 28:777–787Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nevo A. A practitioner's guide to estimation of random co-efficients logit models of demand. J. Econom. Management Strategy (2000) 9:513–548Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nevo A. Measuring market power in the ready-to-eat cereal industry. EconometricaForthcomingGoogle Scholar
• NewsweekBuyers of new cars: Segments and models (1988) 2(Newsweek, New York) Google Scholar
• Pakes A., Ericson R. Empirical implications of alternative models of firm dynamics. J. Econom. Theory (1997) 79:1–45Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pakes A., McGuire P. Computing Markov-perfect Nash equilibria: Numerical implications of a dynamic differentiated product model. Rand J. Econom. (1994) 25:555–589Crossref, Google Scholar
• Petrin A.Quantifying the benefits of new products: The case of the minivan (1999) (University of Chicago, Chicago, IL) . Working PaperGoogle Scholar
• Prescott J. E., Kohli A. K., Venkatraman N. The market-share profitability relationship: An empirical assessment of major assertions and contradictions. Strategic Management J. (1986) 7:377–394Crossref, Google Scholar
• Putsis W. P., Dhar Ravi. Category expenditure, promotion and competitive market interactions: Can private labels expand the pie? (1997) (Yale School of Management, New Haven, CT) . Working PaperGoogle Scholar
• Putsis W. P., Dhar Ravi. The many faces of competition. Marketing Lett. (1998) 9(3):269–284Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roy A., Hanssens D. M., Raju J. S. Competitive pricing by a price leader. Management Sci. (1994) 40(7):809–823Link, Google Scholar
• Risen J. Smallest Japanese auto firms being squeezed in U.S. auto market. The Los Angeles Times (1988) December27Google Scholar
• Slade M. E. Product rivalry and multiple strategic weapons: An analysis of price and advertising competition. J. Econom. Management Strat. (1995) 4(3):445–476Crossref, Google Scholar
• Train K.Qualitative Choice Analysis: Theory, Econometrics and an Application to Automobile Demand (1986) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Verboven M. International price discrimination in the European car market. Rand J. Econom. (1996) 27(2):242–262Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vilcassim N., Kadiyali V., Chintagunta P. Investigating dynamic multifirm market interactions in price and advertising. Management Sci. (1999) 45(4):499–518Link, Google Scholar
• Villas-Boas J.M., Winer R.S. Endogeneity in brand choice models. Management Sci. (1999) 45(10):1324–1338Link, Google Scholar
• Ward's Automotive YearbookWard's Communication (1981–1990) (Detroit, MI)Google Scholar
• White G. L. Why GM rewound its product strategy, delaying new cavalier. The Wall Street Journal (1999) July30Google Scholar