The Dimensionality of Customer Satisfaction Survey Responses and Implications for Driver Analysis

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.2013.0779

References

  • Beckwith NE, Lehmann DR. The importance of halo effects in multi-attribute attitude models. J. Marketing Res. (1975) 12(3):265–275CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bollen KA. Structural Equations with Latent Variables (1989) (John Wiley & Sons, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bradlow ET, Zaslavsky AM. A hierarchical latent-variable model for ordinal data from a customer satisfaction survey with “no answer” responses. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. (1999) 94(445):43–52Google Scholar
  • Bradlow ET, Wainer H, Wang X. A Bayesian random effects model for testlets. Psychometrika (1999) 64(2):153–164CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cunningham WH, Cunningham ICM, Green RT. The ipsative process to reduce response set bias. Public Opinion Quart. (1977) 41(3):379–384CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Finn A. Investigating the non-linear effects of e-service quality dimensions on customer satisfaction. J. Retailing Consumer Services (2011) 18(1):27–37CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fornell C, Johnson MD, Anderson EW, Cha J, Bryant BE. The American customer satisfaction index: Nature, purpose, and findings. J. Marketing (1996) 60(4):7–18CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Frühwirth-Schnatter S. Finite Mixture and Markov-Switching Models (2006) (Springer, New York) Google Scholar
  • Gal D, Rucker DD. Answering the unasked question: Response substitution in consumer surveys. J. Marketing Res. (2011) 48(1):185–195CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gibbons RD, Hedeker DR. Full-information item bi-factor analysis. Psychometrika (1992) 57(3):423–436CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Green PJ. Reversible jump Markov chain Monte Carlo computation and Bayesian model determination. Biometrika (1995) 82(4):711–732CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Groves RM, Fowler FJ, Couper MP, Lepkowski JM, Singer E, Tourangeau R. Survey Methodology (2004) (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Hayes BE. Measuring Customer Satisfaction and Loyalty: Survey Design, Use, and Statistical Analysis Methods (2008) (ASQ Quality Press, Milwaukee) Google Scholar
  • Iacobucci D, Bagozzi RP. Classic factor analysis. Principles of Marketing Research (1994) (Blackwell, Cambridge, MA) 279–316Google Scholar
  • J.D. Power and Associates 2012 U.S. wireless smartphone and traditional mobile phone customer satisfaction study—Vol. 2 results. (2012) . Press release (September 6), J.D. Power and Associates, Westlake Village, CA. http://www.jdpower.com/content/study/s1019it/2012-u-s-wireless-smartphone-and-traditional-mobile-phone-customer-satisfaction-study-vol-2-results.htmGoogle Scholar
  • Johnson VE, Albert JH. Ordinal Data Modeling (1999) (Springer, New York) Google Scholar
  • Jones CS. A nonlinear factor analysis of S&P 500 Index option returns. J. Finance (2006) 61(5):2325–2363CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jöreskog KG. Some contributions to maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika (1967) 32(4):443–482CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kass RE, Raftery AE. Bayes factors. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. (1995) 90(430):779–795CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Krantz DH, Luce RD, Suppes P, Tversky A. Foundations of Measurement (1971) (Academic Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Ledermann W. On the rank of the reduced correlational matrix in multiple-factor analysis. Psychometrika (1937) 2(2):85–93CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lubke GH, Muthén B. Investigating population heterogeneity with factor mixture models. Psych. Methods (2005) 10(1):21–39CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McCulloch RE, Polson NG, Rossi PE. A Bayesian analysis of the multinomial probit model with fully identified parameters. J. Econometrics (2000) 99(1):173–193CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Meredith W. Measurement invariance, factor analysis and factorial invariance. Psychometrika (1993) 58(4):525–543CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mulaik SA. The Foundations of Factor Analysis (1972) (McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
  • Newton MA, Raftery AE. Approximate Bayesian inference with the weighted likelihood bootstrap. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B (1994) 56(1):3–48Google Scholar
  • Otter T, Allenby G, van Zandt T. An integrated model of discrete choice and response time. J. Marketing Res. (2008) 45(5):593–607CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Press SJ, Shigemasu K, Olkin I, Gleser LJ, Perlman MD, Press S, Sampson A. Bayesian inference in factor analysis. Contributions to Probability and Statistics (1989) (Springer, New York) 271–287CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rossi P, Gilula Z, Allenby G. Overcoming scale usage heterogeneity: A Bayesian hierarchical approach. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. (2001) 96(453):20–31CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rossiter JR. The C-OAR-SE procedure for scale development in marketing. Internat. J. Res. Marketing (2002) 19(4):305–335CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Smith AK, Bolton RN, Wagner J. A model of customer satisfaction with service encounters involving failure and recovery. J. Marketing Res. (1999) 36(3):356–372CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sonnier G, Ainslie A. Estimating the value of brand-image associations: The role of general and specific brand-image. J. Marketing Res. (2011) 48(3):518–531CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Spearman C. “General intelligence,” objectively determined and measured. Amer. J. Psych. (1904) 15(2):201–292CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tanner MA, Wong WH. The calculation of posterior distributions by data augmentation. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. (1987) 82(398):528–549CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Thorndike EL. A constant error in psychological ratings. J. Appl. Psych. (1920) 4(1):25–29CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Thurstone LL. Current misuse of the factorial methods. Psychometrika (1937) 2(2):73–76CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • van der Lans R, Pieters R, Wedel M. Eye-movement analysis of search effectiveness. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. (2008) 103(482):452–461CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • van Rosmalen J, van Herk H, Groenen PJF. Identifying response styles: A latent-class bilinear multinomial logit model. J. Marketing Res. (2010) 47(1):157–172CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wang X, Bradlow ET, Wainer H. A general Bayesian model for testlets: Theory and applications. Appl. Psych. Measurement (2002) 26(1):109–128CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wedel M, DeSarbo WS. Market segment derivation and profiling via a finite mixture model framework. Marketing Lett. (2002) 13(1):17–25CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wedel M, Kamakura WA. Market Segmentation: Conceptual and Methodological Foundations (2000) (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, MA) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ying Y, Feinberg F, Wedel M. Leveraging missing ratings to improve online recommendation systems. J. Marketing Res. (2006) 43(3):355–365CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.