National Brand's Response to Store Brands: Throw In the Towel or Fight Back?

References

• Ailawadi KL, Harlam B. An empirical analysis of the determinants of retail margins: The role of store brand share. J. Marketing (2004) 68(1):47–65Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ailawadi KL, Pauwels K, Steenkamp JEM. Store brands and store loyalty. J. Marketing (2008) 72(11):19–30Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barsky R, Bergen M, Dutta S, Levy D, Feenstra RC, Shapiro MD. What can the price gap between branded and private-label products tell us about markups? Scanner Data and Price Indexes (2002) 1st ed.(University of Chicago Press, Chicago) 165–228NBER Studies in Income and WealthGoogle Scholar
• Bonfrer A, Chintagunta PK. Store brands: Who buys them and what happens to retail prices when they are introduced? Rev. Indust. Organ. (2004) 24(3):195–218Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brander JA, Eaton J. Product line rivalry. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1984) 74(3):323–334Google Scholar
• Chen X, Narasimhan O, John G, Dhar T. An empirical investigation of private label supply by national label producers. Marketing Sci. (2010) 29(4):738–755Link, Google Scholar
• Choi CS, Coughlin AT. Private label positioning: Quality versus feature differentiation from national brand. J. Retailing (2006) 82(2):79–93Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chryssolouris G. Manufacturing Systems: Theory and Practice (2006) 2nd ed.(Springer, New York) Google Scholar
• Corstjens M, Lal R. Building store loyalty through store brands. J. Marketing Res. (2000) 37(3):281–291Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dhar SK, Hoch SJ. Why store brand penetration varies by retailer. Marketing Sci. (1997) 16(3):208–227Link, Google Scholar
• Dick A, Jain A, Richardson P. How consumers evaluate store brands. J. Product Brand Management (1996) 5(2):19–28Crossref, Google Scholar
• Du R, Lee E, Staelin R. Bridge, focus, attack, or stimulate: Retail category management strategies with a store brand. Quant. Marketing Econom. (2005) 3(4):393–418Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dukes AJ, Geylani T, Srinivasan K. Strategic assortment reduction by a dominant retailer. Marketing Sci. (2009) 28(2):309–319Link, Google Scholar
• Dunne D, Narasimhan C. The new appeal of private labels. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1999) May–June):3–8Google Scholar
• Gabszewicz JJ, Thisse J-F. Entry (and exit) in a differentiated industry. J. Econom. Theory (1980) 22(2):327–338Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gabszewicz JJ, Shaked A, Sutton J, Thisse J-F. Segmenting the market: The monopolist's optimal product mix. J. Econom. Theory (1986) 39(2):273–289Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gilbert RJ, Matutes C. Product line rivalry with brand differentiation. J. Indust. Econom. (1993) 41(3):223–240Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gruca TS, Sudharshan D, Ravi Kumar K. Marketing mix response to entry in segmented markets. Internat. J. Res. Marketing (2001) 18(1–2):53–66Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hauser JR, Shugan SM. Defensive marketing strategies. Marketing Sci. (1983) 2(4):319–360Link, Google Scholar
• Hayes RH, Wheelwright SC. Link manufacturing process and product life cycles. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1979) January):2–9Google Scholar
• Horowitz I. An option-pricing look at the introduction of private labels. J. Oper. Res. Soc. (2000) 51(2):221–230Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krajewski LJ, Ritzman LP. Operations Management: Processes and Value Chains (2004) 7th ed.(Pearson Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ) Google Scholar
• Kumar N, Radhakrishnan S, Rao RC. Private label vendor selection supply chain: Quality and clientele effects. J. Retailing (2010) 86(2):148–158Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lal R. Manufacturer trade deals and retail price promotions. J. Marketing Res. (1990) 27(4):428–444Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Cui TH. The length of product line in distribution channels. Marketing Sci. (2010) 29(3):474–482Link, Google Scholar
• Meza S, Sudhir K. Do private labels increase retailer bargaining power? Quant. Marketing Econom. (2010) 8(3):333–363Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mills DE. Why retailers sell private labels. J. Econom. Management Strategy (1995) 4(3):509–528Crossref, Google Scholar
• Narasimhan C, Wilcox RT. Private labels and the channel relationship: A cross-category analysis. J. Bus. (1998) 71(4):573–600Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pauwels K, Srinivasan S. Who benefits from store brand entry? Management Sci. (2004) 23(3):364–390Abstract, Google Scholar
• Pauwels K, Srinivasan S, Rao VR. Pricing of national brands versus store brands: Market power components, findings and research opportunities. Handbook of Pricing Research in Marketing (2009) (Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, UK) 258–282Crossref, Google Scholar
• PLBuyer Suppliers guide. PLBuyer (2011) 25(2):60–72Google Scholar
• Private Label Manufacturers Association Private Label Manufacturers Association's (PLMA) 2011 private label yearbook. (2011) . Technical report, Nielsen Company, New YorkGoogle Scholar
• Quelch JA, Harding D. Brands versus private labels: Fighting to win. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1996) January–February):99–109Google Scholar
• Raju JS, Sethuraman R, Dhar SK. The introduction and performance of store brands. Management Sci. (1995) 41(6):957–978Link, Google Scholar
• Ritson M. Should you launch a fighter brand? Harvard Bus. Rev. (2009) October):87–94Google Scholar
• Sayman S, Raju JS. How category characteristics affect the number of store brands offered by the retailer. J. Retailing (2004) 80(4):279–287Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sayman S, Hoch SJ, Raju JS. Positioning of store brands. Marketing Sci. (2002) 21(4):378–397Link, Google Scholar
• Scott-Morton F, Zettelmeyer F. The strategic positioning of store brands in retailer–manufacturer negotiations. Rev. Indust. Organ. (2004) 24(2):161–194Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sethuraman R. Assessing the external validity of analytical results from national brand and store brand competition models. Marketing Sci. (2009) 28(4):759–781Link, Google Scholar
• Sudhir K, Talukdar D. Does store brand patronage improve store patronage? Rev. Indust. Organ. (2004) 24(2):143–160Crossref, Google Scholar
• Villas-Boas JM. Product line design for a distribution channel. Marketing Sci. (1998) 17(2):156–169Link, Google Scholar
• Wernerfelt B. Product line rivalry: Note. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1986) 76(4):842–844Google Scholar