Optimizing Retail Assortments

References

• Ahuja RA, Ergun Ö, Orlin JB, Punnen AP (2002) A survey of large-scale neighborhood search techniques. Discrete Appl. Math. 123(1–3):75–102.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ailawadi KL, Harlam B (2004) An empirical analysis of the determinants of retail margins: The role of store-brand share. J. Marketing 68(1):147–165.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Albuquerque P, Bronnenberg BJ (2009) Estimating demand heterogeneity using aggregated data: An application to the frozen pizza category. Marketing Sci. 28(2):356–372.Link, Google Scholar
• Angrist JD, Pischke J-S (2009) Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist's Companion (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ataman B, Mela CF, van Heerde HJ (2007) Consumer packaged goods in France: National brands, regional chains and local branding. J. Marketing Res. 44(1):14–20.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Axsäter S (1996) Using the deterministic EOQ formula in stochastic inventory control. Management Sci. 42(6):830–834.Link, Google Scholar
• Bambridge P (2007) Consumer goods manufacturers are losing control of space management. Gartner Industry Research Report G00154105, Gartner, Stamford, CT.Google Scholar
• Bambridge P (2008) Categories where detailed space and assortment planning delivers results. Gartner Industry Research Report G00161939, Gartner, Stamford, CT.Google Scholar
• Bijmolt THA, van Heerde HJ, Pieters RGM (2005) New empirical generalizations on the determinants of price elasticity. J. Marketing Res. 42(2):141–156.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blattberg RC, George EI (1991) Shrinkage estimation of price and promotional elasticities: Seemingly unrelated equations. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 86(414):304–315.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boatwright P, Nunes JC (2001) Reducing assortment: An attribute-based approach. J. Marketing 65(2):50–63.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boatwright P, Rossi PE, McCulloch R (1999) Account-level modeling for trade promotion: An application of a constrained parameter hierarchical model. J. Amer. Statist. Soc. 94(December):1063–1073.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Borin N, Farris PW (1995) A sensitivity analysis of retailer shelf management models. J. Retailing 71(2):153–171.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Borin N, Farris PW, Freeland JR (1994) A model for determining retail product category assortment and shelf space allocation. Decision Sci. 25(3):359–384.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Borle S, Boatwright P, Kadane JB, Nunes JC, Shmueli G (2005) Effect of product assortment changes on customer retention. Marketing Sci. 24(4):612–622.Link, Google Scholar
• Broniarczyk SM (2008) Product assortment and consumer psychology. Haugtvedt CP, Herr PM, Kardes FR, eds. Handbook of Consumer Psychology (Psychology Press, New York), 755–779.Google Scholar
• Broniarczyk SM, Hoyer WD, McAlister LM (1998) Consumer's perceptions of the assortment offered in a grocery category: The impact of item reduction. J. Marketing Res. 35(2):166–177.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bucklin RE, Gupta S (1999) Commercial use of UPC scanner data: Industry and academic perspectives. Marketing Sci. 18(3):247–273.Link, Google Scholar
• Bultez A, Naert P (1988) SH.A.R.P.: Shelf allocation for retailers' profit. Marketing Sci. 7(3):211–231.Link, Google Scholar
• Campo K, Gijsbrechts E (2004) Should retailers adjust their micro-marketing strategies to type of outlet? An application to location-based store space allocation in limited and full-service grocery stores. J. Retailing Consumer Services 11(6):369–383.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Campo K, Gijsbrechts E, Goossens T, Verhetsel A (2000) The impact of location factors on the attractiveness and optimal space shares of product categories. Internat. J. Res. Marketing 17(4):255–279.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chintagunta PK (2001) Endogeneity and heterogeneity in a probit demand model: Estimation using aggregate data. Marketing Sci. 20(4):442–456.Link, Google Scholar
• Chintagunta PK, Nair HS (2011) Discrete-choice models of consumer demand in marketing. Marketing Sci. 30(6):977–996.Link, Google Scholar
• Chong J-K, Ho T-H, Tang CS (2001) A modeling framework for category assortment planning. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 3(3):191–210.Link, Google Scholar
• Cooper LG, Nakanishi M (1983) Standardizing variables in multiplicative choice models. J. Consumer Res. 10(June):96–108.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Drèze X, Hoch SJ, Purk ME (1994) Shelf management and space elasticity. J. Retailing 70(4):301–326.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fader PS, Hardie BGS (1996) Modeling consumer choice among SKUs. J. Marketing Res. 18(3):442–452.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feit EM, Beltramo MA, Feinberg FM (2010) Reality check: Combining choice experiments with market data to estimate the importance of product attributes. Management Sci. 56(5):785–800.Link, Google Scholar
• Fishbein M, ed. (1967) Attitude and Prediction of Behavior (John Wiley & Sons, New York).Google Scholar
• Fox EJ, Montgomery AL, Lodish LM (2004) Consumer shopping and spending across retail formats. J. Bus. 77(2):25–60.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goodall DW (1966) A new similarity index based on probability. Biometrics 22(4):882–907.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hardie BGS (1994) The market response to product line extensions. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
• Hardie BGS, Lodish LM, Fader PS, Sutcliffe AP, Kirk WT (1998) Attribute-based market share models: Methodological development and managerial applications. Working paper, London Business School, London.Google Scholar
• Hoch ST, Kim B, Montgomery AL, Rossi PE (1995) Determinants of store-level price elasticity. J. Marketing Res. 32(1):17–29.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hwang M, Bronnenberg BJ, Thomadsen R (2010) An empirical analysis of assortment similarities across U.S. supermarkets. Marketing Sci. 29(5):858–879.Link, Google Scholar
• Ioannou I, Mortimer JH, Mortimer R (2011) The effects of capacity on sales under alternative vertical contracts. J. Indust. Econom. 59(1):117–154.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kellerer H, Pferschy U, Pisinger D (2004) Knapsack Problems (Springer-Verlag, Berlin).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kök AG, Fisher ML (2007) Demand estimation and assortment optimization under substitution: Methodology and application. Oper. Res. 55(6):1001–1021.Link, Google Scholar
• Kök AG, Fisher ML, Vaidyanathan R (2009) Assortment planning: Review of literature and industry practice. Agrawal N, Smith SA, eds. Retail Supply Chain Management (Springer, New York), 99–154.Google Scholar
• Lancaster K (1971) Consumer Demand: A New Approach (Columbia University Press, New York).Google Scholar
• LeSage JP (1998) Applied econometrics using MATLAB. Working paper, University of Toledo, Toledo, OH.Google Scholar
• Levy M, Weitz BW (2004) Retailing Management, 5th ed. (McGraw-Hill Irwin, New York).Google Scholar
• Mahajan S, van Ryzin G (2001) Stocking retail assortments under dynamic consumer substitution. Oper. Res. 49(3):334–351.Link, Google Scholar
• Mantrala MK, Levy M, Kahn BE, Fox EJ, Gaidarev P, Dankworth B, Shah D (2009) Why is assortment planning so difficult for retailers? A framework and research agenda. J. Retailing 85(1):71–83.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McIntyre SH, Miller CM (1999) The selection and pricing of retail assortments: An empirical approach. J. Retailing 75(3):295–318.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miller CA, Smith SA, McIntyre SH, Achabal DA (2010) Optimizing and evaluating retail assortments for infrequently purchased products. J. Retailing 86(2):159–171.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Misra K (2008) Understanding retail assortments in competitive markets. Working paper, London School of Business, London.Google Scholar
• Montgomery AL (1997) Creating micro-marketing pricing strategies using supermarket data. Marketing Sci. 16(4):315–337.Link, Google Scholar
• Nakanishi M, Cooper LG, Kassarjian HH (1974) Voting for a political candidate under conditions of minimal information. J. Consumer Res. 1(September):36–43.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nevo A (2000) A practitioner's guide to estimation of random-coefficients logit models of demand. J. Econom. Management Strategy 9(4):531–548.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nevo A (2001) Measuring market power in the ready-to-eat cereal industry. Econometrica 69(2):307–342.Crossref, Google Scholar
• O'Connell V (2008) Reversing field, Macy's goes local. Wall Street Journal (April 21), http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120873643128029889.html.Google Scholar
• Papadimitriou CH, Steiglitz K (1982) Combinatorial Optimization: Algorithms and Complexity (Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ).Google Scholar
• Parducci A (1965) Category judgment: A range-frequency model. Psych. Rev. 72:407–418.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Parducci A, Wedell DH (1986) The category effect with rating scales: Number of categories, number of stimuli, and method of presentation. J. Experiment. Psych.: Human Perception Performance 12(4):496–516.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Raftery AE, Lewis SM (1996) Implementing MCMC. Gilks WR, Richardson S, Spiegelhalter DJ, eds. Markov Chain Monte Carlo in Practice (Chapman & Hall, London), 115–130.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rigby DK, Vishwanath V (2006) Localization: The revolution in consumer markets. Harvard Bus. Rev. 84(4):82–92.Google Scholar
• Rooderkerk RP, van Heerde HJ, Bijmolt TH (2011) Incorporating context effects into a choice model. J. Marketing Res. 48(August):767–780.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rossi PE, Allenby GM (1993) A Bayesian approach to estimating household parameters. J. Marketing Res. 30(2):171–182.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rossi PE, Allenby GM, McCulloch R (2005) Bayesian Statistics and Marketing (John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sinha A, Sahgal A, Mathur SK (2013) Category optimizer: A dynamic-assortment, new-product-introduction, mix-optimization, and demand-planning system. Marketing Sci. 32(2):221–228.Link, Google Scholar
• Sloot LM, Fok D, Verhoef PC (2006) The short- and long-term impact of an assortment reduction on category sales. J. Marketing Res. 43(4):536–548.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith SA, Agrawal N (2000) Management of multi-item inventory systems with demand substitution. Oper. Res. 48(1):50–64.Link, Google Scholar
• Spiegelhalter DJ, Best NG, Carlin BP, Van der Linde A (2002) Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit (with discussion). J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B 64(4):583–616.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Swait J, Andrews RL (2003) Enriching scanner panel models with choice experiments. Marketing Sci. 22(4):442–460.Link, Google Scholar
• Tversky A (1972) Elimination by aspects: A theory of choice. Psych. Rev. 79(4):281–299.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Urban TL (1998) Approach to product assortment and shelf-space allocation. J. Retailing 74(1):15–36.Crossref, Google Scholar
• U.S. Census Bureau (2010) Gross margin as percentage of sales. Report, U.S. Census Bureau, Suitland, MD. http://www.census.gov/retail.Google Scholar
• Van Dijk A, van Heerde HJ, Leeflang PSH, Wittink DR (2004) Similarity-based spatial methods for estimating shelf space elasticities from correlational data. Quant. Marketing Econom. 2(September):257–277.Crossref, Google Scholar
• van Heerde HJ, Gijsbrechts E, Pauwels K (2008) Winners and losers in a major price war. J. Marketing Res. 45(5):499–518.Crossref, Google Scholar
• van Heerde HJ, Leeflang PSH, Wittink DR (2004) Decomposing the sales promotion bump with store data. Marketing Sci. 23(3):317–334.Link, Google Scholar
• van Heerde HJ, Mela CF, Manchanda P (2004) The dynamic effect of innovation on market structure. J. Marketing Res. 41(2):166–183.Crossref, Google Scholar
• van Nierop E, Fok D, Franses PH (2008) Interaction between shelf layout and marketing effectiveness and its impact on optimizing shelf arrangements. Marketing Sci. 27(6):1065–1082.Link, Google Scholar
• Wilson RH (1934) A scientific routine for stock control. Harvard Bus. Rev. 13:116–128.Google Scholar
• Wittink DR, Addona MJ, Hawkes W, Porter JC (1988) SCAN*PRO: The estimation, validation, and use of promotional effects based on scanner data. Working paper, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
• Zheng Y-S (1992) On properties of stochastic inventory systems. Management Sci. 38(1):87–103.Link, Google Scholar