Invited Paper—Learning Models: An Assessment of Progress, Challenges, and New Developments

References

• Ackerberg D (2003) Advertising, learning, and consumer choice in experience good markets: A structural empirical examination. Internat. Econom. Rev. 44(3):1007–1040.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ackerberg D, Benkard L, Berry S, Pakes A (2007) Econometric tools for analyzing market outcomes. Heckman JJ, Leamer EE, eds. Handbook of Econometrics, Vol. 6A, Chapter 63 (North-Holland, Amsterdam).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aguirregebirria V, Mira P (2010) Dynamic discrete choice structural models: A survey. J. Econometrics 156(1):38–67.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anand B, Shachar R (2011) Advertising, the matchmaker. RAND J. Econom. 42(2):205–245.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Banerjee AV (1992) A simple model of herd behavior. Quart. J. Econom. 107(3):797–817.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berry S, Levinsohn J, Pakes A (1995) Automobile prices in market equilibrium. Econometrica 63(4):841–890.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cai H, Chen Y, Fang H (2009) Observational learning: Evidence from a randomized natural field experiment. Amer. Econom. Rev. 99(3):864–882.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Camacho N, Donkers B, Stremersch S (2011) Predictably non-Bayesian: Quantifying salience effects in physician learning about drug quality. Marketing Sci. 30(2):305–320.Link, Google Scholar
• Chamberlain G (1984) Panel data. Griliches Z, Intriligator MD, eds. Handbook of Econometrics, Vol. 2 (Elsevier Science, Amsterdam), 1247–1318.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chan T, Hamiltion B (2006) Learning, private information, and the economic evaluation of randomized experiments. J. Political Econom. 114(6):997–1040.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chan T, Narasimhan C, Xie Y (2013) Treatment effectiveness and side effects: A model of physician learning. Management Sci. 59(6):1309–1325.Link, Google Scholar
• Che H, Erdem T, Öncü S (2011) Periodic consumer learning and evolution of consumer brand preferences. Working paper, New York University, New York.Google Scholar
• Chen X, Chen Y, Weinberg C (2013) Learning about movies: The impact of movie release types on the nationwide box office. J. Cultural Econom. 37(3):359–386.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chernew M, Gowrisankaran G, Scanlon D (2008) Learning and the value of information: Evidence from health plan report cards. J. Econometrics 144(1):156–174.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chevalier J, Goolsbee A (2009) Are durable goods consumers forward-looking? Evidence from college textbooks. Quart. J. Econom. 124(4):1853–1884.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ching A, Ishihara M (2010) The effects of detailing on prescribing decisions under quality uncertainty. Quant. Marketing Econom. 8(2):123–165.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ching A, Erdem T, Keane M (2009) The price consideration model of brand choice. J. Appl. Econometrics 24(3):393–420.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ching AT (2000) Dynamic equilibrium in the U.S. prescription drug market after patent expiration. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.Google Scholar
• Ching AT (2010a) Consumer learning and heterogeneity: Dynamics of demand for prescription drugs after patent expiration. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. 28(6):619–638.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ching AT (2010b) A dynamic oligopoly structural model for the prescription drug market after patent expiration. Internat. Econom. Rev. 51(4):1175–1207.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ching AT (2013) Comments on: “Social learning and peer effects in consumption: Evidence from movie sales” by E. Moretti. Working paper, Rotman School of Management, University of Toronto, Toronto.Google Scholar
• Ching AT, Ishihara M (2012) Measuring the informative and persuasive roles of detailing on prescribing decisions. Management Sci. 58(7):1374–1387.Link, Google Scholar
• Ching AT, Erdem T, Keane M (2010) How much do consumers know about the quality of products? Evidence from the diaper market. Working paper, Rotman School of Management, University of Toronto, Toronto.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ching AT, Erdem T, Keane M (2012a) A simple approach to estimate the roles of learning and inventories in consumer choice. Working paper, Rotman School of Management, University of Toronto, Toronto.Google Scholar
• Ching AT, Clark R, Horstmann I, Lim H (2011) The effects of publicity on demand: The case of anti-cholesterol drugs. Working paper, Rotman School of Management, University of Toronto, Toronto. http://ssrn.com/abstract=1782055.Google Scholar
• Ching AT, Imai S, Ishihara M, Jain N (2012b) A practitioner's guide to Bayesian estimation of discrete choice dynamic programming models. Quant. Marketing Econom. 10(2):151–196.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chintagunta PK, Jing R, Jin GZ (2009) Information, learning, and drug diffusion: The case of Cox-2 inhibitors. Quant. Marketing Econom. 7(4):399–443.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chintagunta P, Goettler R, Kim M (2012) New drug diffusion when forward-looking physicians learn from patient feedback and detailing. J. Marketing Res. 49(6):807–821.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chung D, Steenburgh T, Sudhir K (2013) Do bonuses enhance sales productivity? A dynamic structural analysis of bonus-based compensation plans. Working paper, Harvard Business School, Boston.Google Scholar
• Coscelli A, Shum M (2004) An empirical model of learning and patient spillover in new drug entry. J. Econometrics 122(2): 213–246.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Crawford G, Shum M (2005) Uncertainty and learning in pharmaceutical demand. Econometrica 73(4):1137–1173.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Deighton J (1984) The interaction of advertising and evidence. J. Consumer Res. 11(3):763–770.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dickstein M (2012) Efficient provision of experience goods: Evidence from antidepressant choice. Working paper, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.Google Scholar
• Dubé JP, Hitsch G, Rossi P (2010) State dependence and alternative explanations for consumer inertia. RAND J. Econom. 41(1):417–445.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eckstein Z, Horsky D, Raban Y (1988) An empirical dynamic model of brand choice. Working Paper 88, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY.Google Scholar
• Erdem T (1998) An empirical analysis of umbrella branding. J. Marketing Res. 35(3):339–351.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Erdem T, Keane MP (1996) Decision-making under uncertainty: Capturing dynamic brand choice processes in turbulent consumer goods markets. Marketing Sci. 15(1):1–20.Link, Google Scholar
• Erdem T, Swait J (1998) Brand equity as a signaling phenomenon. J. Consumer Psych. 7(2):131–157.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Erdem T, Imai S, Keane M (2003) Brand and quantity choice dynamics under price uncertainty. Quant. Marketing Econom. 1(1):5–64.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Erdem T, Katz M, Sun B (2010) A simple test for distinguishing between internal reference price theories. Quant. Marketing Econom. 8(3):303–332.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Erdem T, Keane MP, Sun B (2008) A dynamic model of brand choice when price and advertising signal product quality. Marketing Sci. 27(6):1111–1125.Link, Google Scholar
• Erdem T, Keane M, Öncü S, Strebel J (2005) Learning about computers: An analysis of information search and technology choice. Quant. Marketing Econom. 3(3):207–246.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ericson R, Pakes A (1995) Markov-perfect industry dynamics: A framework for empirical work. Rev. Econom. Stud. 62(1):53–82.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fang H, Wang Y (2010) Estimating dynamic discrete choice models with hyperbolic discounting, with an application to mammography decisions. NBER Working Paper 16438, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fernandez JM (2013) An empirical model of learning under ambiguity: The case of clinical trials. Internat. Econom. Rev. 54(2):549–573.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ferreyra MM, Kosenok G (2011) Learning about new products: An empirical study of physicians' behavior. Econom. Inquiry 49(3):876–898.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Geweke J, Keane M (2000) Bayesian inference for dynamic discrete choice models without the need for dynamic programming. Mariano R, Schuermann T, Weeks MJ, eds. Simulation-Based Inference and Econometrics: Methods and Applications (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 100–131.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Geweke J, Keane M (2001) Computationally intensive methods for integration in econometrics. Heckman JJ, Leamer EE, eds. Handbook of Econometrics, Vol. 5 (Elsevier Science, Amsterdam), 3463–3568.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gittins JC, Jones DM (1979) A dynamic allocation index for the discounted multiarmed bandit problem. Biometrika 66(3):771–784.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goettler R, Clay K (2011) Tariff choice with consumer learning and switching costs. J. Marketing Res. 48(4):633–652.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grubb M, Osborne M (2012) Cellular service demand: Tariff choice, usage uncertainty, biased beliefs, learning, and bill shock. Working paper, MIT Sloan School of Management, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Guadagni PM, Little JDC (1983) A logit model of brand choice calibrated on scanner data. Marketing Sci. 2(3):203–238.Link, Google Scholar
• Heckman JJ (1981) Heterogeneity and state dependence. Rosen S, ed. Studies in Labor Markets (University of Chicago Press, Chicago), 91–140.Google Scholar
• Heckman JJ (1997) Instrumental variables: A study of implicit behavioral assumptions used in making program evaluations. J. Human Resources 32(3):441–462.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hendel I, Nevo A (2006) Measuring the implications of sales and consumer inventory behavior. Econometrica 74(6):1637–1673.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hendel I, Nevo A (2013) Intertemporal price discrimination in storable goods markets. Amer. Econom. Rev. Forthcoming.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hendricks K, Sorensen A (2009) Information and the skewness of music sales. J. Political Econom. 117(2):324–369.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hitsch GJ (2006) An empirical model of optimal dynamic product launch and exit under demand uncertainty. Marketing Sci. 25(1):25–50.Link, Google Scholar
• Hoffman M, Burks S (2013) Training contracts, worker overconfidence, and the provision of firm-sponsored general training. Working paper, Yale School of Management, New Haven, CT.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Houser D (2003) Bayesian analysis of a dynamic stochastic model of labor supply and saving. J. Econometrics 113(2):289–335.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Houser D, Keane M, McCabe K (2004) Behavior in a dynamic decision problem: An analysis of experimental evidence using a Bayesian type classification algorithm. Econometrica 72(3):781–822.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hu Y, Kayaba Y, Shum M (2013) Nonparametric learning rules from bandit experiments: The eyes have it! Games Econom. Behav. 81(September):215–231.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Imai S, Jain N, Ching A (2009) Bayesian estimation of dynamic discrete choice models. Econometrica 77(6):1865–1899.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ishihara M, Ching AT (2012) Dynamic demand for new and used durable goods without physical depreciation: The case of Japanese video games. Working paper, Stern School of Business, New York University, New York. http://ssrn.com/abstract=2189871.Google Scholar
• Israel M (2005) Services as experience goods: An empirical examination of consumer learning in automobile insurance. Amer. Econom. Rev. 95(5):1444–1463.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Iyengar R, Ansari A, Gupta S (2007) A model of consumer learning for service quality and usage. J. Marketing Res. 44(4):529–544.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jovanovic B (1979) Job matching and the theory of turnover. J. Political Econom. 87(5):972–990.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kalra A, Li S, Zhang W (2011) Understanding responses to contradictory information about products. Marketing Sci. 30(6):1098–1114.Link, Google Scholar
• Keane M (1992) A note on identification in the multinomial probit model. J. Bus. Econom. Statist. 10(2):193–200.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keane M (1993) Simulation estimation for panel data models with limited dependent variables. Maddala GS, Rao CR, Vinod HD, eds. The Handbook of Statistics, Vol. 11 (North-Holland, Amsterdam), 545–571.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keane M (1994) A computationally practical simulation estimator for panel data. Econometrica 62(1):95–116.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keane M (2010a) Structural vs. atheoretic approaches to econometrics. J. Econometrics 156(1):3–20.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keane M (2010b) A structural perspective on the experimentalist school. J. Econom. Perspect. 24(2):47–58.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keane MP, Wolpin KI (1994) The solution and estimation of discrete choice dynamic programming models by simulation: Monte Carlo evidence. Rev. Econom. Statist. 76(4):648–672.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keane MP, Todd PE, Wolpin KI (2011) The structural estimation of behavioral models: Discrete choice dynamic programming methods and applications. Ashenfelter O, Card D, eds. Handbook of Labor Economics, Vol. 4A (Elsevier, San Diego), 331–461.Google Scholar
• Keller K (2002) Branding and brand equity. Weitz B, Wensley R, eds. Handbook of Marketing (Sage, London), 151–178.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kihlstrom R, Riordan M (1984) Advertising as a signal. J. Political Econom. 92(3):427–450.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Knight B, Schiff N (2010) Momentum and social learning in presidential primaries. J. Political Econom. 118(6):1110–1150.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Koopmans TC, Rubin H, Leipnik RB (1950) Measuring the equation systems of dynamic economics. Koopmans TC, ed. Cowles Commission Monograph 10: Statistical Inference in Dynamic Economic Models (John Wiley & Sons, New York), 53–237.Google Scholar
• Leffler KB (1981) Persuasion or information? The economics of prescription drug advertising. J. Law Econom. 24(1):45–74.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lim H, Ching A (2012) A structural analysis of promotional mix, publicity and correlated learning: The case of statins. Working paper, University of Toronto, Toronto.Google Scholar
• Marcoul P, Weninger Q (2008) Search and active learning with correlated information: Empirical evidence from mid-Atlantic clam fisherman. J. Econom. Dynam. Control 32(6):1921–1948.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Maskin E, Tirole J (1988) A theory of dynamic oligopoly, I and II. Econometrica 56(3):549–570.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Matzkin RL (2007) Nonparametric identification. Heckman JJ, Leamer EE, eds. Handbook of Econometrics, Vol. 6B (North-Holland Press, Amsterdam), 5307–5368.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McCulloch R, Polson N, Rossi P (2000) A Bayesian analysis of the multinomial probit model with fully identified parameters. J. Econometrics 99(1):173–193.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mehta N, Chen X, Narasimhan O (2008) Informing, transforming, and persuading: Disentangling the multiple effects of advertising on brand choice decisions. Marketing Sci. 27(3):334–355.Link, Google Scholar
• Mehta N, Rajiv S, Srinivasan K (2004) The role of forgetting in memory-based choice decisions. Quant. Marketing Econom. 2(2):107–140.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miller R (1984) Job matching and occupational choice. J. Political Econom. 92(6):1086–1120.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mira P (2007) Uncertain infant mortality, learning, and life-cycle fertility. Internat. Econom. Rev. 48(3):809–846.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miravete E (2003) Choosing the wrong calling plan? Ignorance and learning. Amer. Econom. Rev. 93(1):297–310.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moretti E (2011) Social learning and peer effects in consumption: Evidence from movie sales. Rev. Econom. Stud. 78:356–393.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Narayanan S, Manchanda P (2009) Heterogeneous learning and the targeting of marketing communication for new products. Marketing Sci. 28(3):424–441.Link, Google Scholar
• Narayanan S, Chintagunta P, Miravete E (2007) The role of self selection, usage uncertainty, and learning in the demand for local telephone service. Quant. Marketing Econom. 5(1):1–34.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Narayanan S, Manchanda P, Chintagunta P (2005) Temporal differences in the role of marketing communication in new product categories. J. Marketing Res. 42(3):278–290.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Norets A (2009) Notes and comments: Inference in dynamic discrete choice models with serially correlated unobserved state variables. Econometrica 77(5):1665–1682.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Osborne M (2011) Consumer learning, switching costs, and heterogeneity: A structural examination. Quant. Marketing Econom. 9(1):25–46.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pastorino E (2012) Careers in firms: Estimating a model of learning, job assignment, and human capital acquisition. Research Department Staff Report 469, Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, Minneapolis.Google Scholar
• Roberts JH, Urban GL (1988) Modeling multiattribute utility, risk, and belief dynamics for new consumer durable brand choice. Management Sci. 34(2):167–185.Link, Google Scholar
• Rust J (1994) Structural estimation of markov decision processes. Engle RF, McFadden DL, eds. Handbook of Econometrics, Vol. 4 (Elsevier Science, Amsterdam), 3081–3143.Google Scholar
• Rust J (2010) Comments on: “Structural vs. atheoretic approaches to econometrics” by Michael Keane. J. Econometrics 156(1):21–24.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shin S, Misra S, Horsky D (2012) Disentangling preferences and learning in brand choice models. Marketing Sci. 31(1):115–137.Link, Google Scholar
• Sims CA (1972) Money, income, and causality. Amer. Econom. Rev. 62(4):540–552.Google Scholar
• Sridhar K, Bezawada R, Trivedi M (2012) Investigating the drivers of consumer cross-category learning for new products using multiple data sets. Marketing Sci. 31(4):668–688.Link, Google Scholar
• Stange K (2012) An empirical investigation of the option value of college enrollment. Amer. Econom. J.: Appl. Econom. 4:49–84.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stinebrickner T, Stinebrickner R (2012) Learning about academic ability and college dropout decision. J. Labor Econom. 30(4):707–748.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Watanabe Y (2009) Learning and bargaining in dispute resolution: Theory and evidence for medical malpractice litigation. Working paper, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.Google Scholar
• Xiao M (2010) Is quality accreditation effective? Evidence from the childcare market. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. 28(6):708–721.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yang B, Ching AT (2013) Dynamics of consumer adoption of financial innovation: The case of ATM cards. Management Sci. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
• Yang S, Zhao Y, Erdem T, Koh D (2010) Modeling consumer choice with dyadic learning and information sharing: An intra-household analysis. Working paper, Stern School of Business, New York University, New York.Google Scholar
• Yao S, Mela CF, Chiang J, Chen Y (2012) Determining consumers' discount rates with field studies. J. Marketing Res. 49(6):822–841.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhang J (2010) The sound of silence: Observational learning in the U.S. kidney market. Marketing Sci. 29(2):315–335.Link, Google Scholar
• Zhao Y, Zhao Y, Helsen K (2011) Consumer learning in a turbulent market environment: Modeling consumer choice dynamics after a product-harm crisis. J. Marketing Res. 48(2):255–267.Crossref, Google Scholar